Federal Acknowledgment Process: Hearing Before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, Second Session, on Oversight of the Federal Acknowledgment Process and the Federal Acknowledgment Project of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, June 2, 1980, Washington, D.C.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - 102 էջ |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
aboriginal Indian title Act of March active consideration Administration for Native American Rights Fund application attorney Band budget Bureau of Indian Chairman Cherokee claims Commissioner committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Creek decision Department Development documented petition Eagle Pass efforts Federal Acknowledgment Project Federal agencies Federal Government Federal recognition Health Indian Affairs Indian Community Indian groups Indian Reorganization Act JOHN MELCHER LaDonna Harris LIBRARY OF CONGRES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Lumbee Mashpee ment Mexican Cession Michigan Narragansett Tribe Native American Native American Rights nonfederally recognized Indian North Carolina organizations P.O. Box Petitioners petitioning groups present problems proposed findings public domain Question recognized tribes regulations reservations right of occupancy Samish Tribe Senator MELCHER Snohomish Tribe Snoqualmie Steilacoom Stillaguamish Tribe submitted Supreme Court technical assistance testimony Traditional Kickapoo Tribe training and technical treaty fishing rights treaty rights Tribal Council tribal groups Tribe of Indians Tunica-Biloxi Wampanoag Western Washington
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 82 - No purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the Constitution.
Էջ 79 - This -5principle,acknowledged by all Europeans, * * * gave to the nation making the discovery, the sole right of acquiring the soil and of making settlements on it. It was an exclusive principle, which shut out the right of competition among those who
Էջ 91 - requiring every person claiming lands in California by virtue of any right or title derived from a Spanish or Mexican government to present the same to commissioners, and their failure to do so within the two years limited for that purpose by
Էջ 94 - The majority of the court is of opinion that the nature of the Indian title, which is certainly to be respected by all courts, until it be legitimately extinguished, is not such as to be absolutely repugnant to seizin in fee on the part of the state.
Էջ 37 - bodies of Indian tribes on Federal and State reservations, Alaskan Native villages, and regional corporations established by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, such public and nonprofit private agencies serving Hawaiian Natives, and Indian organizations in urban or rural nonreservation areas, for projects pertaining to the
Էջ 82 - or to any state * * * unless the same shall be made and duly executed at some public treaty, held under the authority of the United States.
Էջ 87 - any State who may be present at any treaty held with Indians under the authority of the United States, in the presence and with the approbation of the commissioner of the United States appointed to hold the same, may, however, propose to, and adjust with, the Indians, the compensation to be made for their claim to lands within such State, which shall be extinguished by treaty. RS §2116
Էջ 83 - that extinguishment of tribal occupancy rights may not be inferred from general legislation that does not refer specifically to Indian rights or from administrative action taken under such legislation, even though such administrative action may in fact interfere with the full enjoyment of such possessory rights.
Էջ 83 - a tribal claim to land will be recognized although it has no basis in any treaty, statute, or other formal government action,
Էջ 26 - If you have any questions, we will be glad to answer them, sir.