« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »
Marwick, Mitchell & Co. announce the opening of an office in the Horter building, Plaza de Armas, Obispo and Oficios streets, Havana, under the supervision of S. L. G. Sutherland, with R. J. Austin as resident manager.
William D. Brash and M. L. Blanchard announce the formation of a partnership under the name of Brash & Blanchard, with offices at 18 Asylum street, Hartford, Connecticut, and World Tower building, New York.
Scovell, Wellington & Co. announce that the following have been admitted to partnership in the firm: J. Chester Crandell, F. Richmond Fletcher, William A. Schick, Harold S. Morse, Horace G. Crockett.
E. L. Bundy, M. A. Bundy and H. A. Raun announce the formation of a partnership under the designation Commercial Accounting Association, with offices at 842 Book building, Detroit, Michigan.
William Dillon, 67 Milk street, Boston, Massachusetts, announces that Schuyler Dillon has been admitted to the firm, which will continue in practice under the name of William Dillon & Son.
Snyder & Co. and Richter & Co. announce the consolidation of their practices under the firm name of Richter & Co., with offices in the Farmers' Bank building, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
James F. Welch announces that he has admitted James J. Hastings to partnership. The firm name will be Welch & Hastings, with offices in Paterson, New York and Washington.
Smith & Scheuring Audit Company, of Green Bay, Wisconsin, announce the admission to partnership of Frank J. Jonet and the change of the firm name to Smith, Scheuring & Jonet.
MacHugh, Hill & Co., 277 Pine street, San Francisco, California, announce that they have succeeded to the practice formerly conducted by MacHugh & Garretson.
Arthur Young & Co. announce the opening of an office at 416 Pacific Finance building, Los Angeles, California, under the direction of George E. Dell, resident partner.
Frederick B. Emerson announces the opening of an office at 522-523 North American building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Official Organ of the American Institute of Accountants
A Proposal for Junior C. P. A. Examinations*
BY J. A. BEXELL
It is a trite saying that the demand for accountants far exceeds the supply. The tremendous growth of the accounting profession since the organization of the American Association of Public Accountants in 1887 far exceeds the fondest hopes of the founders of the accounting fraternity. Laws have been enacted in all states except one regulating the practice of the profession. High schools, colleges and universities are vying with each other to establish courses in accounting. The American Institute of Accountants is carrying on a splendid educational programme and the American Association of University Instructors in Accounting is doing its share to raise the standard of accounting education. In spite of all the educational activities, I know of no locality where there is an adequate supply of trained accountants. This is particularly true of assistants, or junior accountants, who must perform a large share of the routine work of accounting investigations.
FAILURES IN EXAMINATIONS That the training of accounting students is defective is amply evident from the small percentage of applicants who pass the C. P. A. examinations. Accurate data are not at hand, but it is safe to assume that more than seventy-five per cent fail in their first attempt to pass the state examinations. That this is not due entirely to defective instruction has been recognized by the American Institute of Accountants in providing a uniform examination from which unessentials and "catch problems” shall be eliminated. In the writer's opinion, the failures are due to three principal defects in accounting instruction: (1) unfamiliarity
* A paper read at the annual meeting of the American Association of University Instructors in Accounting, Atlantic City, New Jersey, December 29, 1920.
with the requirements of the state authorities on the part of the instructors and hence also on the part of the students; (2) lack of practical experience, evident from the fact that a very large percentage of failures is found in the practical part of the examinations; and (3) inexperience of the student in taking long examinations and solving long problems under pressure. This inexperience often causes excessive nervousness, so that the student's ability is inaccurately reflected in the examination.
REMEDIES The remedy for the first defect lies, of course, primarily in the instructors and in the activities of the accounting associations, national, state and local. The uniform examination of the American Institute of Accountants and the excellent Students' Depart* ment of THE JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY will do much to familiarize instructors and students with the requirements of the various state boards. Unfamiliarity with accounting practice can be remedied only by experience and practice in the solution of typical problems of wide variety. The prospective public accountant is in much the same position as the doctor of medicine. I know of no state which does not require at least one year's experience in an approved hospital before the candidate is allowed to apply for examination. To be sure, the various state laws require experience in practical accounting, but the requirement is too often perfunctory, if not altogether waived.
The third defect can be remedied only by practice in taking examinations and working under pressure. This should be one of the indirect advantages secured from a junior examination. Stimulated by the requirements of the junior examination, the courses of study and the instructors should be able to remedy in great part this defect. After the required training in the class room in the solution of C. P. A. problems, the student should be well prepared to take the examination set by the state board and conducted under its auspices.
AMENDMENT OF THE UNIFORM LAW
"Written examinations of applicants shall be held as often as may be necessary in the opinion of the board and at such times
and places as it may designate, but not less than once in each calendar year. If five or more persons apply for examination within not less than four months after the annual examination, the board shall hold an examination for said applicants. Examinations may be both oral and written, at the discretion of the board."
This section should be amended by adding: “Upon application of the president of a properly accredited school giving instruction in the subjects covered by the C. P. A. examinations, the board may set a junior examination for duly qualified students recommended by the presidents of such institutions. Students who pass this examination shall receive certificates of proficiency as junior accountants." Required fees for preparing and conducting the examinations, grading papers, certificates and other details should be specified in the law or by board regulations.
My suggestion would be that a representative of the board conduct the examination whenever possible, but examinations could be conducted on the same plan as the civil service examinations by authorized local representatives.
SCOPE OF THE EXAMINATION The scope of the uniform junior examination should be the same as the regular examination and equally difficult. The scope is stated in section eight of the uniform C. P. A. law:
“The written examination of applicants shall at least cover the four general subjects, with a minimum time allowance, as follows:
and such other subjects as may be required by the board. Seventyfive per cent shall be required in each subject."
A complete file of all who pass should be kept in the office of the board for the use of the accounting profession. The holder of a junior certificate should be entitled to take the state C. P. A. examination after a year's service in an accountant's office.
ADVANTAGES OF THE JUNIOR EXAMINATION I shall merely enumerate some of the many advantages of the junior examination:
1. It would stimulate an interest in accounting courses of study in the higher schools of commerce by setting a definite goal for the student.
2. It would afford more definite training in the essentials and eliminate many unessentials from the courses of study and from the examination.
3. It would establish more definite relations between the professional accountants and the accounting instructors.
4. It would tend toward standardizing and improving courses in accounting and auditing.
5. Accounting examinations and requirements for graduation would be standardized.
6. It should have a tendency to develop uniform text-book and laboratory material in accounting and auditing.
7. It would familiarize the student with the duties of the junior accountant.
8. It would call for practice in taking examinations and solving long accounting problems under pressure.
9. It would tend to eliminate undesirable candidates and thus reduce the percentage of failures in C. P. A. examinations.
It would afford a definite source of supply of junior accountants.
12. An increased supply of competent instructors in accounting would be available.
Nearly all the advantages enumerated are so obvious that they need only be mentioned. Two or three are so important that they deserve emphasis.
Chief among the advantages mentioned is doubtless the interest in accounting education which would be stimulated by this examination. The definite goal toward which the student would have to work would in itself be a very great advantage.
The third advantage, namely, the establishment of definite relations between professional accountants and instructors, is an actual need at present. Except in a few states, there is a wide chasm between the schools and the practising accountants, which should be bridged. The practising accountants claim that the