Freedom and Public Faith: Speech of William H. Seward, on the Abrogation of the Missouri Compromise, in the Kansas and Nebraska Bills, Թողարկում 28Buell & Blanchard, printers, 1854 - 16 էջ |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 6–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 4
... further ORDAINED and declared that this law should be considered a COMPACT between the original States and the People and States of said Territory , and forever remain unalterable , unless by common consent . The Ordinance was agreed to ...
... further ORDAINED and declared that this law should be considered a COMPACT between the original States and the People and States of said Territory , and forever remain unalterable , unless by common consent . The Ordinance was agreed to ...
Էջ 5
... further than to say that the slaveholding States practically were to receive slaveholding States , It is a question of transcendent importance . the free States to receive a desert , a solitude , in The proviso of 1820 , to be abrogated ...
... further than to say that the slaveholding States practically were to receive slaveholding States , It is a question of transcendent importance . the free States to receive a desert , a solitude , in The proviso of 1820 , to be abrogated ...
Էջ 8
... further and finally elucidated by an amendment , which declared that the first irrepealable act protecting Ne- braska from slavery was now declared " in- operative and void , " because it was inconsist- ent with the present purposes of ...
... further and finally elucidated by an amendment , which declared that the first irrepealable act protecting Ne- braska from slavery was now declared " in- operative and void , " because it was inconsist- ent with the present purposes of ...
Էջ 9
... further . Can you now , by an act which is not a compromise between the same parties , but a mere ordinary law , extend the force and obligation of the principles of that Compromise of 1850 into regions not only excluded from it , but ...
... further . Can you now , by an act which is not a compromise between the same parties , but a mere ordinary law , extend the force and obligation of the principles of that Compromise of 1850 into regions not only excluded from it , but ...
Էջ 10
... further on through the new territory we had acquired so recently from Mexico , until it should disappear in the waves of the Pacific Ocean , so as to se- cure actual toleration of slavery in all of this new territory that should be ...
... further on through the new territory we had acquired so recently from Mexico , until it should disappear in the waves of the Pacific Ocean , so as to se- cure actual toleration of slavery in all of this new territory that should be ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
abnegate abolish abrogating the Missouri acquired from France acquired from Mexico admitted African slave trade agita already annex argument authority over slavery bills boons offered braska California Committee Compromise laws Compromise of 1850 Congress consent continent contrary Daniel Webster District of Columbia domain enact equivalents establish exclude slavery Federal forever prohibited Fort Leavenworth free labor free territory Freedom and Slavery freemen fugitive slave law hereafter holding honor Indians introduction of slavery irrepealable legislative line of 36 Louisiana measure Mexico and Utah mise Mississippi Missouri Compromise line mutual non-slave non-slaveholding Ohio Ohio river Ordinance Pacific Ocean parties patriarchs peace political principle proposed question region acquired renounce Republic secure Senator from Illinois slave territory slaveholding slavery agitation Slavery laws spirit Statesman statute subject of slavery Terri Territo Territorial Governments Territorial Legislature Territory of Nebraska Texas tion tory transaction Union United violation Wilmot Proviso wise
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 7 - That in all that territory ceded by France to the United States under the name of Louisiana, which lies north of thirty•six degrees and thirty minutes north latitude, not included within the limits of the state contemplated by this act, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, for ever prohibited...
Էջ 8 - ... it being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any territory or state, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the constitution of the United States...
Էջ 11 - ... north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri compromise line, shall be admitted into the Union with or without slavery, as the people of each State asking admission may desire. And in such State or States as shall be formed out of said territory north of said Missouri compromise line, slavery, or involuntary servitude, (except for crime,) shall be prohibited.
Էջ 4 - There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted...
Էջ 7 - an act to authorize the people of the Missouri Territory to form a constitution and State government, and for the admission of such State into the Union on an equal footing with the original States, and to prohibit slavery in certain territories...
Էջ 7 - Congress deemed it wise and prudent to refrain from deciding the matters in controversy then, either by affirming or repealing the Mexican laws, or by an act declaratory of the true intent of the Constitution and the extent of the protection afforded by it to slave property in the Territories ; so your committee are not prepared...
Էջ 7 - Under this section, as in the case of the Mexican law in New Mexico and Utah, it is a disputed point whether slavery is prohibited in the Nebraska country by valid enactment. The decision of this question involves the constitutional power of Congress to pass laws prescribing and regulating the domestic institutions of the various Territories of the Union. In the opinion of those eminent statesmen who hold that Congress is invested with no rightful authority to legislate upon the subject of slavery...
Էջ 11 - New States, of convenient size, not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas, and having sufficient population, may hereafter, by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the federal constitution.
Էջ 9 - I now throw my gauntlet at the feet of every senator now here, who was in the senate in 1850, and challenge him to say that he then knew, or thought, or dreamed, that, by enacting the compromise of 1850, he was directly or indirectly abrogating, or in any degree impairing, the Missouri Compromise ? No one takes it tip.
Էջ 11 - States as may be formed out of that portion of said territory lying south of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri compromise line, shall be admitted into the Union, with or without slavery, as the people of each State asking admission may desire.