 | 1892 - 554 էջ
...cited for the defendant, Mr. Justice Strong said: " The true rule is that what is the proximate canse of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science, or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances attending." The... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1908 - 604 էջ
...the Supreme Court of the United States, in Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 24 L. Ed. 256, "that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...for the jury. It is not a question of science, or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending... | |
 | 1878 - 442 էջ
...Mass. 494; Tent Vs. Thf Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co. , 49 111. 349. ) The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it. The primary cause may be the proximate cause... | |
 | 1878 - 680 էջ
...without the aid of other causes not reasonably to be expected. Held, no error; the true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it. The primary cause may be the proximate cause... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886 - 682 էջ
...107 id. 494 ; Tent v. The Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co., 49 I11. 340. The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for U,e jury. It is not a question of science or of le9al knowled9e. R is to be determined as a fact, in... | |
 | 1919 - 2026 էջ
...Strong in Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 474, 24 L. Ed. 256: "The true rule is that what Is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal know-lodge. It Is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 էջ
...relies upon it. 9. SAME— PROXIMATE CAUSE— EXISTENCE OF EVIDENCE— DIRKCTING VERDICT. The question, what is the proximate cause of an injury? is ordinarily a question for the jury. But the burden is always on the plaintiff, in an action for personal injury, to show that the negligence... | |
 | 1895 - 2084 էջ
...Judge. JENKINS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts). Without doubt, whether a given act or omission is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for a jury. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 46Í). This, however, is subject to the well-settled rule that... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1882 - 764 էջ
...supreme court of the United States in M. & St. P. Railway Co.v. Kellogg, supra: " The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the Brown and wife vs. The Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul B'y Co. circumstances of... | |
| |
The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury Is ordinarily a question for the Jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending It. 
