Page images
PDF
EPUB

Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, followed in Alzua v. Johnson, 106.
Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, followed in Straus v. Foxworth,
162; New Louisville Jockey Club v. Oakdale, 739.

Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 541, followed in At-
lantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Miller, 741.

Chicago, M. & St. P. R. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418, followed in
In re Engelhard & Sons Co., 646.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm., 218 U. S. 88, fol-
lowed in Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States, 736.
Coyle v. Oklahoma, 221 U. S. 559, followed in United States v. Sandoval,

28.

Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, followed in John v. Paullin, 583.

De Bearn v. De Bearn, 225 U. S. 695, followed in Same v. Same, 741.
Defiance Water Co. v. Defiance, 191 U. S. 184, followed in Glenwood Light
& Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, followed in De Bearn v.
De Bearn, 741; Washington Dredging & Imp. Co. v. Washington,
742.

Detroit v. Parker, 181 U. S. 399, followed in Heavner v. Elkins, 743.
Dushane v.
Beall, 161 U. S. 513, followed in Yazoo & M. V. R. R. Co. v.
Brewer, 245.

Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, followed in
Marshall v. Dye, 250.

Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn, 741;
Washington Dredging & Imp. Co. v. Washington, 741.

Ex parte Harding, 219 U. S. 363, followed in Ex parte Capo, 739.
Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 100, followed in King v. Buskirk, 735; Zeller
v. New Jersey, 737.

Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455, followed in King v. Buskirk, 735.

Fisher v.
New Orleans, 218 U. S. 438, followed in Seattle & Renton Ry. v.
Linhoff, 568.

Flint v. Stone-Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, followed in United States v.

Whitridge, 144.

Foppiano v. Speed, 199 U. S. 501, followed in Rabb v. Louisiana, 740.
Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. Hagg, 219 U. S. 195, followed in Easton
v. Chicago Hotel Co., 738.

Glickstein v. United States, 222 U. S. 139, followed in Cameron v. United
States, 710.

Glos v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 599, followed in Glos v. O'Connell, 740.

Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, followed in Kener v. La Grange Mills, 215.
Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531, followed in De Bearn v.
De Bearn, 741.

Hammond v. Whittredge, 204 U. S. 538, followed in Yazoo & M. V. R. R.
Co. v. Brewer, 245.

Heike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, followed in Darsey v. Georgia, 741.
Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366, followed in Lee v. United States, 735.
Home Telephone Co. v. Los Angeles, 211 U. S. 265, followed in Louisville

& Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 298.

Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516, followed in Zeller v. New Jersey,
737.

Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm., 206 U. S. 454, followed
in Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States, 736.

Indiana v. Liverpool, L. & G. Ins. Co., 109 U. S. 168, followed in Vicks-
burg v. Vicksburg Water Works Co., 740.

In re Louisville, 231 U. S. 639, followed in Louisville v. Cumberland Tele-
phone Co., 652.

Interstate Com. Comm. v. Goodrich Transit Co., 224 U. S. 194, followed
in Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 423.
Interstate Com. Comm. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 227 U. S. 88,
followed in Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States, 736.
Johannessen v. United States, 225 U. S. 227, followed in Luria v. United
States, 9.

Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co., 191 U. S. 150, followed in Glen-
wood Light & Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Kelly v. Pittsburgh, 104 U. S. 80, followed in New Louisville Jockey Club
v. Oakdale, 739.

King v. Cornell, 106 U. S. 395, followed in Rainey v. W. R. Grace & Co.,
703.

Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville, 200 U. S. 22, followed in Glenwood
Light & Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co., 215 U. S. 349, followed in Aetna Life Ins.
Co. v. Moore, 543.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Cook Brewing Co., 223 U. S. 70, fol-

lowed in Lee v. United States, 735.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 231 U. S. 298, followed in
Grand Trunk Ry. v. Michigan Railway Commission, 457.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, followed in
Torres v. Lothrop, Luce & Co., 171.

Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, followed in Easton v. Chicago
Hotel Co., 738.

Lovell v. Newman, 227 U. S. 412, followed in Lovell v. Hentz & Company,

738.

McCune v. Essig, 199 U. S. 382, followed in Buchser v. Buchser, 157.
Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288, followed in Vicksburg v.
Henson, 259; Pacific Creosoting Co. v. United States, 737.

Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250, followed in Pullman Co. v. Croom,
571.

Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U. S. 581, followed in Zeller V. New Jersey, 737.
VOL. CCXXXI-50

Mercantile Bank v. New York, 121 U. S. 138, followed in Amoskeag Sav-

ings Bank v. Purdy, 373.

Merritt v. Bowdoin College, 169 U. S. 551, followed in Kirkpatrick v.
Harnesberger, 736.

Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. Powers, 201 U. S. 245, followed in Louis-
ville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 298.

Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U. S. 352, followed in Louisville & Nashville
R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 298.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. May, 194 U. S. 267, followed in Missouri,
K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Letot, 738.

Mobile &c. R. R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, followed in Luria v.
United States, 9.

Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S. 531, followed in New Louisville
Jockey Club v. Oakdale, 739.

Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, followed in Lee v. United States, 735.
Murphy v. Utter, 186 U. S. 95, followed in Marshall v. Dye, 250.
National City Bank v. Hotchkiss, 231 U. S. 50, followed in Mechanics'
Bank v. Ernst, 60; Greey v. Dockendorff, 513.

New York ex rel. Metropolitan Street Ry. v. Tax Commissioners, 199 U.S.
1, followed in Trimble v. Seattle, 683.

Norfolk Turnpike Co. v. Virginia, 225 U. S. 264, followed in Mulcrevy
v. San Francisco, 669.

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wass, 219 U. S. 426, followed in Northern
Pacific Ry. Co. v. Houston, 181.

North Missouri R. R. Co. v. Maguire, 20 Wall. 46, followed in Clement
National Bank v. Vermont, 120.

Pacific Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118, followed in Marshall v.
Dye, 250.

Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, followed in New York Life Ins. Co. v.

Deer Lodge County, 495.

Payne v. Niles, 26 How. 219, followed in Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Water
Works Co., 740.

Phoenix Railway Co. v. Landis, 231 U. S. 578, followed in Work v.
United Globe Mines, 595.

Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, followed in Louisville &

Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 298.

Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105, followed in Glenwood Light &

Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, followed in Washington Dredging &
Imp. Co. v. Washington, 742.

Price v. United States, 165 U. S. 311, followed in Lee v. United States,

735.

Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, 225 U. S. 282, followed in Atchi-
son, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States, 736.

Reynolds v. Stockton, 140 U. S. 254, followed in Radford v. Myers, 725.
Rogers Locomotive Works v. Emigrant Co., 164 U. S. 559, followed in

Little v. Williams, 335.

Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567, followed in Roney v. Van Ness,
737.

Schaefer v. Werling, 188 U. S. 516, followed in Heavner v. Elkins, 743.
Sexton v. Kessler, 225 U. S. 90, followed in National City Bank v. Hotch-
kiss, 50.

Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, followed in Glenwood Light &

Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Smith v. Indiana, 191 U. S. 138, followed in Marshall v. Dye, 250.
Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, followed in Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co.,
738.

Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall. 596, followed in Union Pacific R. R. Co. v.
Laramie Stock Yards, 190.

Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 271, followed in Washington
Dredging & Imp. Co. v. Washington, 742.

Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. United States, 226 U. S. 20, followed in
Straus v. American Publishers' Assn., 222.

Starr v. Long Jim, 227 U. S. 613, followed in Monson v. Simonson, 341.
Steinmetz v. Allen, 192 U. S. 543, followed in United States v. Antikam-

nia Co., 654.

Swope v. Leffingwell, 105 U. S. 3, followed in Glenwood Light & Water
Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735.

Treat v. Grand Canyon Ry. Co., 222 U. S. 448, followed in Straus v. Fox-
worth, 162.

Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, followed in Zeller v. New Jersey,
737.

Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Laramie Stock Yards, 231 U. S. 190, followed
in Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Snow, 204.

Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Snow, 231 U. S. 204, followed in Union Pacific
R. R. Co. v. Sides, 213.

Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 519, followed in Parker-Wash-
ington Co. v. Cramer, 744.

United States v. Bell Telephone Co., 128 U. S. 315, followed in Luria v.
United States, 9.

United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, followed in Pullman Co. v.
Croom, 571.

United States v. Congress Construction Co., 222 U. S. 199, followed in
Easton v. Chicago Hotel Co., 738.

United States v. Kagama, 118 U. S. 375, followed in United States v.
Sandoval, 28.

United States v. Staats, 8 How. 41, followed in United States v. Davis,

Washington & Georgetown R. R. Co. v. Hickey, 166 U. S. 521, followed in
Munsey v. Webb, 150.

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, followed in Marshall v.

Dye, 250; King v. Buskirk, 735.

Williams v. Paine, 169 U. S. 55, followed in Chavez v. Bergere, 482.
Wisconsin &c. R. R. Co. v. Jacobson, 179 U. S. 287, followed in Grand
Trunk Ry. v. Michigan Railway Commission, 457.

Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn,
741; Washington Dredging & Imp. Co. v. Washington, 742.

Wright v. Morgan, 191 U. S. 55, followed in Buchser v. Buchser, 157.

[blocks in formation]

Citizenship is membership in a political society and implies the re-
ciprocal obligations as compensation for each other of a duty of
allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on
the part of the society. Luria v. United States, 9.

See INDIANS, 5, 8;
JURISDICTION, C 3;

NATURALIZATION, 2, 3.

CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

1. Limitations; effect of back pay and bounty provision of act of March 4,
1907, to confer new cause of action.

The proviso in the back pay and bounty provision in the Sundry Civil

Appropriation Act of March 4, 1907, c. 2918, 34 Stat. 1295, 1356,
directing accounting officers to follow decisions of this court and of
the Court of Claims without regard to former settlements, did not
confer a new cause of action upon the holders of other claims
against the United States which had been adversely ruled upon

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »