upon the budget for the school year was not taken in accord- ance with the provisions of section 207 of the Education Law does not constitute any ground for the removal of the trustees, nor can the failure of the chairman of the annual meeting of the district to insist that the vote be taken in accordance with the statute be charged against him as a basis of a proceeding for his removal from the office of trustee.
While the original action of trustees in making expenditures without specific authority on the part of the district meeting was not within their powers as trustees, the district meeting had the right to ratify and approve the action of the trustees with the same force and effect as if the expenditures had been originally authorized by the district meeting.
Crawford, town of, Orange county, In the matter of the appeal from the order dissolving district No. 2 of the, and annexing its territory to union free school district No. 3 of said town. (Case No. 760), 100.
School districts consolidation consent of trustees and taxpayers not necessary under Education Law, § 129. The consent of the trustees or of the taxpayers of a school district is not required to validate an order made pursuant to section 129 of the Education Law for the consolidation of school districts.
Dearstyne, Edgar, In the matter of the appeal of, from the elec- tion at the annual school meeting held in common school district No. 2 of the town of Pittstown, Rensselaer county, New York, on May 2, 1922. (Case No. 759), 91.
School districts elections dismissed. Where the objections made to the right of persons to vote at an annual district meeting are not in form challenges and the persons offering their votes might have insisted that they be received, the result of the meeting will not be set aside because of their failure to exercise their legal right.
Duanesburg, town of, Schenectady county, In the matter of the appeal from the action of the special district meeting held in union free school district No. 1 of the, August 4, 1922, in desig- nating a new school site for said district. (Case No. 789), 562.
Union free school districts — selection of site for new school - stay order continued for thirty days otherwise appeal dis- missed. The law confers upon the voters of a district the right to designate the school site and unless the site selected is shown to endanger the lives or health of the children or is inaccessible to a considerable portion of the district the Commissioner of Education is not justified in interfering with and setting aside the will of the voters of the district as expressed at the dis- trict meeting.
Should a petition be presented to the board of education, signed by a substantial number of qualified voters of the dis- trict representing not less than thirty per cent of the greatest
number of votes cast at the special district meeting upon any proposition then presented, requesting that a district meeting be called for the designation of another site definitely described in the petition, and in the event of such designation, authoriz- ing the board of education to sell the site selected at the special district meeting, it will become the duty of the board to call such district meeting and then give the voters of the district an opportunity after mature consideration to change the site selected in case they so desire.
Ellery, town of, Chautauqua county, In the matter of the appeal relative to the election of trustee in district No. 11 of the, at the annual district meeting held May 2, 1922.
(Case No. 767), 179. appeal dismissed. An election will not be disturbed at the instance of persons who were present at a district meeting and failed to interpose challenges in case persons not qualified to vote attempted to cast their ballots.
Esopus, town of, Ulster county, In the matter of the appeal of the trustees of district No. 13 of the, from the action of the board of education of the city of Kingston in fixing the tuition rates for the instruction of academic pupils. (Case No. 754), 43.
School districts tuition for nonresident pupils in excess of State tuition may be charged where the cost of instruction is higher than the State tuition. Where it has actually cost a city school district at least forty dollars in excess of the State tuition for the instruction of nonresident pupils during the school year, the board of education had the right to fix its total tuition fee for nonresident academic pupils at ninety dollars, or forty dollars in excess of the State tuition.
The reception of pupils without any notice of additional charge to the districts until late in the term constituted in effect an implied agreement on the part of the board of educa- tion to give such instruction for the consideration that had previously been charged, at least for the term upon which the pupils had then entered and until further notice.
The board permitted to collect an excess tuition of twenty dollars for the second term of the school year.
Fort Covington, town of, Franklin county, In the matter of the appeal from the order dissolving district No. 2 of the, and annex- ing its territory to union free school district No. 1 of said town and county. (Case No. 791), 619.
School districts—consolidation · appeal from order of dis- trict superintendent dismissed. It is not good educational pol- icy to maintain small school districts, particularly where there is a graded school nearby, to which the small district may be joined, thus giving to the pupils the advantages of the graded school and in this case the additional advantages of the academic department.
Gilboa, town of, Schoharie county, In the matter of the appeal from the annual district meeting held in district No. 1 of the, May 2, 1922. (Case No. 768), 180.
School districts — annual meeting - election of trustee· qualification of voters. Election of trustee set aside where it appears that the person declared elected is not a resident of the district.
Where a person holds a school district office and during his term is elected to another district office he vacates the office which he holds by accepting the office under the last election.
Votes cast by persons not possessing the necessary qualifica- tions will be eliminated, and, where a motion to accept the trustees' annual report was in fact carried by a majority of those who were qualified to vote, the recorded action of the meeting to the contrary will be set aside.
Hempstead, town of, In the matter of the appeal from the action of the special district meeting held in union free school district No. 11 of the, December 23, 1921. (Case No. 755), 47.
School districts-transportation of pupils. Where a dis- trict maintains its own school there is no obligation upon the part of the district to provide conveyance for the children unless it is established that the parents are without means of furnishing conveyance, that the distance is too great for the children to walk and that unless the district furnishes such conveyance the children will be practically deprived of school privileges.
Hopewell, town of, Ontario county, In the matter of the appeal from the refusal of district No. 7 of the, to pay the excess tuition charged for the instruction of academic pupils of such district. (Case No. 783), 457.
Union free school districts excess tuition of nonresident pupils appeal sustained. Appeal from refusal of school trustee to pay excess tuition charged for the instruction of pupils in the school of a union free school district, pursuant to a designation made by the district superintendent, sustained. Hoppe, Mary A., In the matter of the appeal of, from the decision of the board of examiners of the city of New York, made March 17, 1922, declaring her ineligible for license as principal of an elementary school and for placement on the eligible list as of December 30, 1921. (Case No. 790), 569.
School teachers alien teacher who is entitled to retain her position in the school system is entitled to advancement — Edu- cation Law, 550. In February, 1920, the appellant, a teacher in the New York schools, married an alien who had declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and, under the law as it then existed, she thereupon took the citizen- ship of her husband.
The board of education contends that, under section 550 of the Education Law, the appellant was not entitled to receive
a license as principal of elementary schools and was not entitled to placement on the eligible list in accordance with her rating. The board contends that appellant might continue in the par- ticular employment in which she found herself upon the certain date fixed by statute, provided she took steps to become a citizen as prescribed in the statute.
Held, that so long as teachers remain in the school system they will be protected in their employment. It was never intended that they could not obtain a position in the system in advance of the particular position which they occupied upon the date fixed by statute provided they became entitled by examination to such advanced position in the same system.
Hyde Park, town of, Dutchess county, In the matter of the appeal of the board of education of union free school district No. 2 of the, from the action of the board of education of the city of Poughkeepsie. (Case No. 792), 710.
Nonresident academic pupils – tuition Education Law, § 493(6), as amended by chapter 383 of the Laws of 1921. Where a city which maintains a high school in which non- resident pupils receive instruction, has a tax rate for school purposes in excess of the rate in the district from which the nonresident pupils come, and where the instruction of such non- resident pupils adds to the total cost of instruction of academic pupils in the city in a sum in excess of the State tuition, the city is entitled, under the provisions of section 493 (6) of the Education Law, as amended by chapter 383 of the Laws of 1921, to receive from the nonresident pupils a tuition fee, including the State tuition, equal to the actual cost of the instruction.
Kingston, city of, In the matter of the appeal of the trustees of district No. 13 of the town of Esopus, Ulster county, from the action of the board of education of the, in fixing the tuition rates for the instruction of academic pupils. (Case No. 754), 43.
School districts tuition for nonresident pupils in excess of State tuition may be charged where the cost of instruction is higher than the State tuition. Where it has actually cost a city school district at least forty dollars in excess of the State tuition for the instruction of nonresident pupils during the school year, the board of education had the right to fix its total tuition fee for nonresident academic pupils at ninety dollars, or forty dollars in excess of the State tuition.
The reception of pupils without any notice of additional charge to the districts until late in the term constituted in effect an implied agreement on the part of the board of educa- tion to give such instruction for the consideration that had previously been charged, at least for the term upon which the pupils had then entered and until further notice.
The board permitted to collect an excess tuition of twenty dollars for the second term of the school year.
Knox, town of, Albany county, In the matter of the appeal from the action of the annual district meeting held in district No. 12 of the, May 2, 1922. (Case No. 769), 184.
School districts elections - Education Law, § 227. School officers must be elected by votes cast by qualified electors, present and voting at the meeting. The casting of a ballot by the clerk or chairman of the meeting as directed by a motion adopted by the electors present does not constitute an election by ballot within the meaning of section 227 of the Education Law.
Landel, Eva S., In the matter of the appeal of, from the action of the trustee of district No. 13 of the town of Alden, Erie county. (Case No. 775), 255.
School teachers appeal from refusal to pay wages sus- tained. Appeal from refusal to pay appellant's wages sustained without prejudice to any action that the district, through its officers, may see fit to take respecting its claim against the appellant for destruction of property or otherwise.
Lawrence, Fred G., In the matter of the appeal of, and Earl W. Pierce from the election of trustee and collector in common school district No. 11 of the town of Fallsburgh at the annual school meeting held May 2, 1922. (Case No. 757), 85.
School districts election of trustee set aside election of collector sustained.
Lenox, town of, Madison county, In the matter of the appeal from an order defining the boundary line between district No. 6 of the towns of Lenox and Sullivan and district No. 9 of the. (Case No. 787), 556.
School districts — order defining boundary lines amended. Where the order of a district superintendent defining a bound- ary line between two school districts, while apparently clear and definite on its face, leaves in dispute a strip of land about eight rods in width, an appeal from such order will be sus- tained in so far as to require an amendment definitely describ- ing the boundary line.
Morrissey, Alice, In the matter of the appeal of, to the Commis- sioner of Education of the State of New York, from the action, determination and decision of the board of examiners of the department of education of the city of New York, dated July 25, 1919. (Case No. 777), 302.
School teachers appeal from action of the board of exam- iners in refusing to grant license dismissed. There must be convincing proof of malice, bad faith or gross error to justify the setting aside upon appeal of a duly considered determina- tion of the board of examiners as to the qualifications, character and fitness of a candidate for a license.
« ՆախորդըՇարունակել » |