THREE-POWER CONFERENCE at Geneva for the LIMITATION OF NAVAL ARMAMENT, JUNE 20-AUGUST 4, 1927-Continued 1927 Apr. 28 (98) From the Ambassador in Great Britain (tel.) May 5 (93) May 6 (105) May 11 (77) May 17 (66) May 23 Chamberlain's statement that British Government prefers Instructions to advise Chamberlain of U. S. assumption that From the Ambassador in Great Britain (tel.) From the Chargé in Japan (tel.) Foreign Minister's emphasis on strong desire of new Japanese From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.) Italian memorandum, in reply to invitation to be represented at Conference, reserving right to send naval experts who may at any given time assume the character of observers (text printed). (Footnote: Information that the Department was advised on June 4 that the Italian Government had appointed two unofficial observers; information, also, that a French Mission d'Information attended the plenary sessions.) To the British Ambassador Confirmation of arrangement that Three-Power Conference at Geneva will open on June 20. Page 38 38 38 39 39 40 (Footnote: Identic note on the same date to the Japanese Ambassador.) May 27 To President Coolidge 40 Recommendations as to membership of American delega tion. June 1 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European 42 Record of conference of State and Navy Department officials with President Coolidge in regard to U. S. policy and proposals to be laid before Geneva Conference. Notification to Mr. Hugh S. Gibson of his appointment as chairman of the American delegation; information that Admiral Hilary P. Jones will be a delegate and that Mr. Hugh R. Wilson will be secretary general; list of State and Navy Department assistants on the delegation; general instructions as to U. S. participation, with emphasis on fact that Conference is most likely to be successful if its deliberations are restricted to the immediate problem of extension of Washington treaty principles and ratios to auxiliary vessels. To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.) Communication of names of British and Dominion dele gates. 45 THREE-POWER Conference at Geneva for the Limitation of Naval ArmaMENT, JUNE 20-AUGUST 4, 1927-Continued Date and number 1927 June 20 (11) June 20 (12) June 20 (15) June 21 (16) June 22 (22) June 22 (23) June 23 (25) June 23 (26) June 23 (27) June 24 (10) Subject From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Press release (text printed), giving an estimate of tonnage Page 46 47 For the President: Message from secretary general of Con- 47 Résumé of first plenary session, at which the chairman of the American delegation was named president of the Conference, organization procedure was decided upon, and the three delegations gave opening statements. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Executive committee resolution (text printed) recommend- From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Request for instructions concerning whether it should be suggested to British that U. S. delegation is prepared to sustain adoption by Conference of a decision (draft printed), reserving consideration of the British proposals to the 1931 Conference provided under the Washington treaty. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) British insistence upon discussion of capital ships at present Belief that Bridgeman desires a plenary meeting soon in To the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Approval of suggested action and draft decision set forth in chairman's telegram No. 25, June 23. THREE-POWER Conference AT GENEVA FOR THE LIMITAtion of Naval ArmaMENT, JUNE 20-AUGUST 4, 1927-Continued Subject Page Date and number 1927 June 24 (31) June 24 (11) June 25 (138) June 26 (32) June 27 (33) June 27 (35) From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Reply of American and Japanese delegates, in response to Bridgeman's inquiry as to suitable time for plenary session debate on British suggestions concerning battleships and aircraft carriers, to effect that since their instructions precluded discussion of Washington treaty revision, they would have to ask their Governments for pertinent instructions. To the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Authorization to take action outlined in chairman's telegram No. 27, June 23, if British insist on elaborately defending their demand for a high cruiser tonnage; assurance that United States is sincere in regard to maintaining parity with Great Britain, but on the other hand is unwilling to sign a treaty increasing British cruiser strength by 75 percent and requiring the United States to triple its cruiser strength. To the Chargé in Great Britain (tel.) Forwarding of chairman's telegram No. 27, June 23, and Department's telegram No. 11, June 24, with instructions to advise Chamberlain informally of U. S. Government's surprise concerning British attitude at Geneva, in view of repeated assurances that Great Britain would accept parity with the United States in all classes of naval vessels. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Optimistic view of American delegation that obstacles, such as satisfying Japanese amour-propre while maintaining Washington treaty ratio and acceding to British desire for no limitation on number of small cruisers, can be overcome; efforts to dispose as soon as possible of British suggestions concerning Washington treaty. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Information, for State and Navy Departments, that com- Suggestion that British delegation might be aided in with- June 27 (36) From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) 60 Expression of regret to Japanese delegate that his Government has revised its instructions to permit acquiescence in British proposals for discussion of capital ships. 61 June 27 From the British Ambassador Information, supplied at Chamberlain's direction and for communication to President Coolidge, that the British Government aimed, in including in its proposals the question of reducing the size of capital ships, to further the spirit of the Washington treaty, to set an example for the Preparatory Commission to follow, and to effect economy in reduction of armaments. 25834642-vol. I- -3 THREE-POWER CONFERENCE at GENEVA FOR THE LIMITATION OF NAVAL ARMAMENT, JUNE 20-AUGUST 4, 1927-Continued Date and number 1927 June 28 Subject Page To President Coolidge 63 Transmittal of British Ambassador's note of June 27, with comments. 64 June 28 (20) June 30 June 30 (44) June 30 45) July 2 (53) July 2 (26) July 4 (58) To the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Information that it is impossible to carry out the suggestion in chairman's telegram No. 35, June 27, because of absence of British Embassy force from Washington, but that copies of chairman's telegram No. 27, June 23, and the Department's telegram No. 11, June 24, have been forwarded to the American Embassy in London with instructions. From President Coolidge Approval of Secretary's position as set forth in letter of From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Press interview authorized by Bridgeman (text printed), denying demand for naval supremacy and reiterating principle of U. S.-British parity, but also expressing opinion that while Great Britain's special needs require a higher number in certain types of vessels, the United States has the right to build up to an equal figure in any type of warship. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Summary of developments favorable to American position: British action in preferring postponement of public sessions, end of their insistence on public debate on U. S.-British naval needs, realization that they cannot force Washington treaty revision by rush tactics, and the reasonable spirit exhibited by the technical committees. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Information that if the British are disinclined to reduce their excessive demands for 75 cruisers, of either 7,500 or 10,000 tons each, American delegation intends to say that it believes the British should publish their figures, together with their justification therefor, and state quite frankly that it was impossible to come to an agreement, thus leaving the entire matter for general agreement in 1931. To the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Instructions to advise British that no proposal which sets total cruiser tonnage figure to be arrived at before 1936 at more than 400,000 tons would make conclusion of an agreement worth while; request for comment on Secretary's intention to consult Canadian and Irish Legations as to any demands for excessive tonnage increases; inquiry regarding possible discussions with the Japanese Ambassador. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Advice that British have already been informed of unacceptability of their figures as real limitation, and opinion that neither inquiries to Canadian and Irish Legations nor discussion with Japanese Ambassador would be advantageous. To the Chargé in Great Britain (tel.) 5 20 July 5 (147) Transmittal of chairman's telegram No. 53, July 2, with instructions to discuss with Baldwin or Chamberlain, if thought advisable, the excessive cruiser tonnage proposed by the British. 64 65 65 66 69 69 70 THREE-POWER CONFERENCE at Geneva for the Limitation of NAVAL ARMAMENT, JUNE 20-AUGUST 4, 1927-Continued Date and number 1927 Subject Page From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) American delegation's suggestion for eventually reconciling British proposal based on numbers with American proposal based on total tonnage (text printed). From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Information that Japanese refuse to accept cruiser tonnage basis of 400,000 tons, that they intend to demand that British revise their figures downward, and that the American delegation has promised hearty cooperation in this demand. To the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Conversation between the Secretary of State and the British Ambassador, in which each explained the attitude of his respective delegation with regard to the general problems of the Conference and also to the specific question of British cruiser tonnage demands. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Résumé of interview with British on cruiser question, which ended without a solution having been reached. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Japanese memorandum (text printed) recommending the adoption of a 450,000-ton basis for auxiliary surface craft for the United States and Great Britain, with 300,000-ton basis for Japan, and 70,000 tons of submarines for Japan. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Belief that, although the British refuse to accept tonnage figures proposed by the Japanese, they may be induced to reasonableness by knowledge that they stand alone in demand for a large cruiser tonnage. From the Ambassador in Great Britain (tel.) Opinion that pressure on Baldwin or Chamberlain will probably be unproductive of results; willingness, however, to impress on them six specific points showing the unfavorable reaction on U. S.-British relations if the British persist in present policy at Geneva. To the Ambassador in Great Britain (tel.) Desire that Ambassador discuss situation with British on basis of his suggestions. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Japanese intention to submit their proposals formally to executive committee and to express determination to abandon Conference if agreement for lower tonnage figures is not reached. From the Chairman of the American Delegation (tel.) Suggestion that, if break-up of Conference appears inevitable, a private conversation of the chief delegates be called at which a general statement of U. S. position may be given and plans may be made for a public statement of the case of each power, in order that public may have information on which to base study of the issues involved. |