Attorneys of mortgagee on sale under fore- closure, where no order for a resale is made, held to have no insurable interest.-Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keating (Md.) 29.
Contract between the insured and a third par- ty held not to pass title to the property insured so as to affect his insurable interest.-West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1081.
insurance.-Hanscom v. Home Ins. Co. (Me.) 324; Same v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., Id.
The fact that insured's hired man visited the premises daily held not to render them occupied, within the meaning of the policy.-Hanscom v. Home Ins. Co. (Me.) 324; Same v. North Brit- ish & Mercantile Ins. Co., Id.
An applicant for life insurance was not "en- gaged" in the sale of alcoholic beverages be- cause, as a servant in an hotel, he was oc- casionally called upon to serve liquor to guess.
Right of chancellor on insolvency of mutual in- surance company to order an assessment deter--Guiltinan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Vt.) mined.-Whitaker v. Meley (N. J. Sup.) 840.
Charges of attorneys in defending actions against employers holding employers' liability insurance policies held proper claims against the receiver of the insurance company.-Ross v. American Employers' Liability Ins. Co. (N. J. Ch.) 22.
Under an employers' liability policy, held that the insurer's liability arises on the happening of the injury, and is not delayed until judg- ment against the employer.-Ross v. American Employers' Liability Ins. Co. (N. J. Ch.) 22.
One induced by mistake to pay premiums on a policy void at its inception may recover them back on repudiating the policy, though the in- surer was estopped from denying the validity of the policy. Hogben v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Conn.) 214.
An insurance agent supplied with policies in blank, and authorized to issue them, held a gen- eral agent in the matter of soliciting and ac- cepting risks.-Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keat- ing (Md.) 29.
A commission to agents of 20 per cent. of the moneys received on account of premiums actually paid will be computed on the total amount re- ceived, regardless of subsequent returns on ac- count of cancellations.-Garfield v. Rutland Ins. Co. (Vt.) 235.
The contract in general.
Where a provision that insured should pay cer- tain assessments in addition to cash premiums was made a part of the consideration for the pol- icy, and a condition of it, acceptance of the policy was tantamount to an agreement to make such payments.-Whittle v. United Fire Ins. Co. (R. I.) 498.
Where an applicant for insurance refuses to accept the policy, and pays no premium, there is no completed contract of insurance.-Hogben v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Conn.) 214.
A provision in an accident insurance policy requiring written notice to be given of injuries within 10 days of the accident held valid be- fore the restrictive legislation in that respect. Kimball v. Masons' Fraternal Acc. Ass'n (Me.) 102.
Policies on property of insured construed, and held not to be on the same subjects, so as to create liability to contribute to a loss.-West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1081.
Written provisions in policy held to prevail over printed stipulations therein.-West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1081.
Forfeiture of policy for breach of war- ranty or condition.
Breach of condition against incumbrances held not to forfeit the policy, where the instru- ment was not delivered until after the fire, and could not have increased the risk.-Hanscom v. Home Ins. Co. (Me.) 324; Same v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., Id.
Erroneous estimates and innocent misstate- ments are not a cause of forfeiture, where the loss, honestly stated, exceeds the amount of the
Interest of a purchaser at sale on foreclosure before final adjudication held not sole and un- conditional, within a provision of an insurance policy. - Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keating (Md.) 29.
Insurance on property obtained by owner held not affected by other insurance thereon, not con- sented to or known of by the owner.-West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1081.
Where insured occasionally dealt in liquors, and the company, after three years, with knowl- edge of the facts on the part of certain of its agents, forfeited the policy for that reason, held, that insured might recover the equitable value of his policy.-McDonald v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (N. H.) 500.
Estoppel, waiver, or agreements affect- ing right to forfeit policy.
Where a general agent, when issuing a policy, knew the facts as to the interest of insured, the company held estopped to rely on them as a forfeiture.-Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keating (Md.) 29.
Forfeiture of a policy for nonoccupancy of the buildings held waived by delay.-Hanscom v. Home Ins. Co. (Me.) 324; Same v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., Id.
Notice and proof of loss.
Waiver of conditions of formal proofs of loss held within the scope of the apparent authority of the special agent.-Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keating (Md.) 29.
Conversation with authorized agent of insur- ance company held a waiver of formal proofs of loss.-Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Keating (Md.)
Evidence held not to show that notice of in- jury as required by an accident insurance pol- icy was waived by the company.-Kimball v. Masons' Fraternal Acc. Ass'n (Me.) 102. Actions.
A declaration that alleges in a general way the performance of all conditions of the policy need not allege that insured had agreed to pay certain assessments, the agreement to pay which was made a condition of the policy.-Whittle v. United Fire Ins. Co. (R. I.) 498.
Provisions of a policy that are in the nature of conditions subsequent have no place in a dec- laration on the policy.-Whittle v. United Fire Ins. Co. (R. I.) 498.
An action on a policy containing a mortgage subrogation clause should be brought in the name of insured for the benefit of the_mortga- gee.-Powers v. New England Fire Ins. Co. (Vt.) 148.
In assumpsit on a fire insurance policy, held, that the averment of the promise was sufficient on general demurrer.-Powers v. New England Fire Ins. Co. (Vt.) 148.
A charge that insured is entitled to the pre- sumption of innocence should be given where the insurer charges that insured obtained the policy by fraud.-Guiltinan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Vt.) 315.
Counsel for plaintiff, in an action on a policy, | payment.-Fox v. Hartford & W. H. H. R. Co. held to have been justified in saying to the (Conn.) 871. jury that, "if that is the way this company is going to treat its policy holders, the policy holders need some protection by statute." Guiltinan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Vt.)
One suing on a life insurance policy does not need either to plead or to prove the truth of answers to questions in the application, though the truth of such answers was warranted, and made a condition of the policy. Guiltinan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Vt.) 315.
Under the general denial, the insurer may show that insured's answers in his application were untrue.-Guiltinan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Vt.) 315.
The question of whether conditions of the policy have been waived is one of fact.-Hans com v. Home Ins. Co. (Me.) 324; Same v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., Id.
The question whether proofs of loss were waived by denials of liability on the policy held for the jury, and not for the court.-Robin- son v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. (Me.) 320.
The question whether the policy covered a carriage house erected after the insurance was effected held for the jury.-Robinson v. Penn- sylvania Fire Ins. Co. (Me.) 320.
In action on life insurance policy, held that, under the evidence, whether statements of in- sured as to his health were false was a question for the jury.-Smith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1038.
In action on life policy, whether insured was in sound health when the policy issued held a question for the jury-Smith v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1038.
Inventories of lumber destroyed held admis- sible in connection with testimony of the parties who made them, in action for insurance.-West Branch Lumberman's Exchange v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Pa.) 1081.
Declarations as to age after premium had been accepted and payments made for a series of years, will be presumed to have been correct. Supreme Council of Golden Star Fraternity v. Conklin (N. J. Err. & App.) 659.
A reinsurer held liable for the full amount of his risk irrespective of the amount the insurer might pay.-Hunt v. New Hampshire Fire Un- derwriters' Ass'n (N. H.) 145.
The insurer, and not the first reinsurer, held entitled to the fund payable under a policy of second reinsurance.-Hunt v. New Hampshire Fire Underwriters' Ass'n (N. H.) 145.
Mutual benefit insurance.
A member whose policy has been rejected must pursue the course provided by the by-laws be- fore suing thereon.-Levy v. Order of the Iron Hall (N. H.) 18.
By-laws construed, and held, that a member in default in the payment of his dues belongs to the society until they take action in ruling him out.-Lamarsh v. L'Union St. Jean Bap- tiste De Nashua (N. H.) 1045.
Though a payment of insurance dues should have been made to an assistant secretary, pay- ment to the secretary himself was held suffi- cient.-Lamarsh v. L'Union St. Jean Baptiste De Nashua (N. H.) 1045.
Disqualification as witness, see "Witnesses." Insurable interest, see "Insurance."
Interest is recoverable on overdue negotiable interest coupons from the date of the demand of
with interest at 9 per cent. until paid, carries A note payable at a certain time after date, Nat. Bank v. Hewins (Me.) 156. interest at that rate after maturity.-Augusta
there are several attachments, must set forth A bill of interpleader by a garnishee, where when and where the attachments were issued, the present status of each, and such further state- ment of the facts as will enable the court to de- termine as to the relief asked.-Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
A bill of interpleader is demurrable where the fund is not brought into the court, and no offer is made to bring it in.-Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
A bill of interpleader not accompanied by an affidavit that it was not filed in collusion with any of the defendants is demurrable.-Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
Where a bill of interpleader is defective for want of an affidavit alleging no collusion between the parties, the defect can be corrected only on leave to amend.-Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
Where a bill of interpleader shows on its face that certain defendants have judgments of con- demnation against complainant, which he seeks to avoid, complainant is interested, and the bill is hence demurrable.-Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
A claim to a fund in suit held not to have been abandoned by the party's failure to an- swer before decree of interpleader, where he answered before final decree, though the de- cree of interpleader adjudged that he had no interest in the fund.-Heald v. Rhind (Md.) 43.
A bill filed by a bank, asking that defendant husband, on the one side, and the executor of the will of his deceased wife, on the other side, be required to interplead respecting the owner- ship of a deposit, held sufficient.-Fairfield Sav. Bank v. Small (Me.) 551.
After defendants have been required to inter- plead concerning the ownership of a fund in complainant's hands, held, that complainant be- comes wholly without the controversy.-Fair- field Sav. Bank v. Small (Me.) 551.
INTOXICATING LIQUORS.
Warrant to search for, see "Searches and Sei- zures."
Price of liquors sold in another state, and de- livered the purchaser within the state in original packages, in violation of Gen. Laws, c. 109. § 18. can be recovered.-Doherty v. Cotter (N. H.) 499.
Finding in a criminal prosecution held con- clusive of forfeiture as against a defendant in an action or a liquor dealer's bond, and illegali- ty of the sentence is immaterial.-Jacobs v. Hol- genson (Conn.) 914.
Liquor dealer's bond held not forfeited by a violation of a statute passed after the bond was executed.-Jacobs v. Holgenson (Conn.) 914.
In civil actions, see "Pleading."
Former jeopardy bar to prosecution, see "Crim- inal Law."
A bill seeking to enjoin the collection of a judgment alleged to be void, which alleges no reason why the judgment should not have been rendered, does not entitle complainant to relief. -Home Ins. Co. v. Caulk (Md.) 901.
Where a case is ended in the common pleas by entry of judgment under order of the supreme court, it cannot be opened for any purpose.-Paul v. Grimm (Pa.) 1006.
A judgment by confession cannot be stricken. off on motion when regular, intended to be en- tered of record, and there was no fraud.-Heist v. Tobias (Pa.) 579.
The fact that a judgment creditor has reasona- ble cause to believe that a debtor is insolvent does not preclude him from enforcing the judg- ment.-Hurlbutt v. Currier (N. H.) 502.
a judgment under the general issue, the judgment cannot be impeached for fraud, or otherwise assailed except as to exist- ence of the record as pleaded.-Clemons v. Clemons' Estate (Vt.) 314.
surance company on his note is conclusive in an action at law against a member, and can only be reviewed or appeal.-Whitaker v. Meley (N. J. Sup.) 840.
Judgment in action on bond signed by ancestor, finding that lands of which he died seised were valueless, held not to estop plaintiff in a suit to set aside conveyances by heirs and devisees from asserting that the lands were not aliened in good faith.-Ransom v. Brinkerhoff (N. J. Ch.) 919.
A judgment in favor of the holder of a note is not conclusive of the rights between the various indorsers of the note.-Crompton v. Spencer (R. I.) 1002.
In a suit to compel transfer of shares of stock, a finding in another suit that the stock belongs to plaintiff is conclusive.-Scott v. Scott (N. H.) 567.
Judgment for defendants in an action on the case against lessees for the value of leased property burned through their negligence held not a bar to an action to recover on the ground that they contracted to return the property in good condition.-Priest v. Foster (Vt.) 78.
A decree giving a devisee a life estate in the property is a bar to a petition by her bringing no new facts before the court, but asking that a conditional devise over be declared void.-In re Wells' Estate (Vt.) 83; Appeal of Ward, Id.
On defense by heirs as to judgment against administrator questions settled in the original action are res judicata.-Paul v. Grimm (Pa.) 1017.
Priority of lien of a judgment as against a mortgage to secure future advances.-Schmidt v. Hedden (N. J. Ch.) 843.
A note with warrant of attorney to enter judg- ment on the maker's interest in partnership prop- erty held a lien on the maker's equitable interest from the time of its entry.-In re Fair Hope North Savage Fire-Brick Co.'s Estate (Pa.) 519; Appeal of Boyts, Id.
Judgment against a corporation after appoint- ment of receiver held not a lien on the funds.- Cowan v. Pennsylvania Plate-Glass Co. (Pa.) 1075; Appeal of Exchange Bank, Id.
Where the complaint states no cause of action, In civil actions, see "Evidence." a judgment for plaintiff is error, though the facts found show a cause of action.-Daly v. City and Town of New Haven (Conn.) 397.
Under Gen. Laws, c. 251, § 9, on filing a mo- On execution, see "Execution." tion in arrest within five days after verdict, the clerk must certify the papers to the appellate division.-Lodge v. O'Toole (R. I.) 980.
Decree of divorce obtained by plaintiff in breach of promise case at request of defendant not sub- ject to collateral attack on his part.-Smith v. Hall (Conn.) 386.
An administrator regularly appointed cannot, on appeal from a decree settling his accounts, im- peach his appointment and all orders relating to the estate, on the ground that decedent was not an inhabitant of the county where the estate was administered, and had no estate in such county.- Appeal of Ela (N. H.) 501.
A representative of a decedent cannot impeach an order of court on the ground that it was pro- cured by decedent's fraud.-Appeal of Ela (N. H.) 501.
Judgment by default in ejectment till set aside held conclusive against defendant.-Bradford v. Burgess (R. I.) 975.
Adjudication of chancellor fixing the amount of indebtedness of a member of an insolvent in-
Amount in controversy, see "Appeal and Er- ror."
In insolvency proceedings, see "Insolvency." Of equity, see "Equity." Particular courts, see "Courts."
See, also, "Grand Jury."
Instructions in civil actions, see "Trial.” Misconduct ground for new trial, see "New Trial."
Taking case or question from jury, see "Trial."
tion of an assigned insolvent estate, without pro- Gen. Laws, c. 274, providing for the distribu- viding for a jury trial as to claims against the estate, held not to violate Const. art. 1, § 15, de- claring that the right of trial by jury shall re- main inviolate.-Merrill v. Bowler (R. I.) 114.
Laws 1895, c. 117, § 1, providing that police courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the supreme court in certain criminal cases, is un-
constitutional, as abridging the right of trial by | jury.-State v. Gerry (N. H.) 272.
Where a person is entitled to untrammeled right of trial by jury, obligation to appeal to higher court in order to obtain it is unwarranted. -State v. Gerry (N. H.) 272.
Effect in equity, see "Equity."
LANDLORD AND TENANT.
See, also, "Fixtures."
Where a tenant at will from year to year agreed that the tenancy should terminate in four weeks after sale of the premises, it was a waiver of his right to three months' notice.-Woodbury v. Butler (N. H.) 379.
Tenancies at will and at sufferance.
A tenancy at will is terminated by alienation of the premises by the landlord without notice to the tenant.-Seavey v. Cloudman (Me.) 540.
A tenant for a term holding over held a tenant at sufferance.-Poole v. Engelke (N. J. Sup.) 823.
2 Gen. St. p. 1923, par. 35, relating to build- Enjoining interference with tenant's possession, ings on leased premises damaged by fire, does see "Injunction." not apply to a tenancy at sufferance.-Poole v. Engelke (N. J. Sup.) 823.
The grantee of a reversion under 1 Gen. St. p. 880, can take advantage of a forfeiture by rea- son of an express condition of a lease.-Boys v. Robinson (N. J. Sup.) 813.
Under an agricultural lease, held, that abso- lute title to all the produce grown during the term was vested in the lessee.-Beers v. Field (Vt.) 270.
A provision in said lease that the lessee should not dispose of any of the produce until the les- sor had received the rent held not to create a lien in favor of the lessor.-Beers v. Field (Vt.) 270. Where an assignee of the lease entered under it and paid rent, held, that there was a ten- ancy independent of the written lease.-Emrich v. Union Stock-Yard Co. of Baltimore County (Md.) 943.
Assignee of one who takes a lease having knowledge of a prior lease held to have no greater right against the prior lessee than his assignor.-Henderson v. Ferrell (Pa.) 1018.
An action of covenant by a lessor against an assignee of the lease, brought at the request of the lessee, held not an election to treat the as- signee as the lessee, so as to release the latter. Whitcomb v. Cummings (N. H.) 503.
Though an unrecorded lease be invalid as to third persons, yet where the circumstances con- nected with it were such that the law implied a tenancy, the lease is admissible to show the terms of such tenancy.--Emrich v. v. Union Stock-Yard Co. of Baltimore County (Md.) 943. In an action by a landlord for possession, his damages were properly assessed in connection with the trial of the issue as to the right of pos- session.-Woodbury v. Butler (N. H.) 379.
Where premises in possession of a tenant are sold, the grantee is subrogated to rights of the grantor as regards the tenant.-Woodbury v. But- ler (N. H.) 379.
Evidence held insufficient to show surrender of term by act and operation of law.-Decker v. Hartshorn (N. J. Err. & App.) 678.
The receipt of rent by a landlord from an un- derlessee held no evidence of his consent to the abandonment of the premises by the original lessee. Decker v. Hartshorn (N. J. Err. & App.) 678.
Landlord may recover from a tenant at suf- ferance for use and occupation.-Poole v. En- gelke (N. J. Sup.) 823.
The rent stipulated for an expired term held not the exclusive measure of satisfaction which the landlord can recover from a tenant at suf- ferance.-Poole v. Engelke (N. J. Sup.) 823. Premises, and enjoyment and use there-
negligent injury to his goods, caveat emptor does In an action by a lessee against a lessor for not apply, where lessee does not claim that the premises are unsuitable for the purpose for which he hired them.-Railton v. Taylor (R. I.) 980.
A landlord who so negligently manages a tenant are damaged by the smoke, ashes, etc., steam-heating apparatus that the goods of his therefrom, is liable to his tenant for such dam- age.-Railton v. Taylor (R. I.) 980.
A lease providing that the goods of the lessee are to be kept in the building at the risk of the lessee in regard to damage by fire, water, etc., held not to bar lessee's right to damages for neg- ligent injury to his goods by lessor.-Railton v. Taylor (R. I.) 980.
A count claiming damages from a lessor for in- jury to lessee's goods by reason of improper con- struction of the building and the steam-heating apparatus therein, is bad when there is no al- legation that the condition of the premises has been changed since the commencement of the tenancy.-Railton v. Taylor (R. I.) 980.
A tenant for years held not responsible for maintaining a structure on the property erected by the landlord which operates as a nuisance.- Meyer v. Harris (N. J. Sup.) 690.
Lessees who agreed to return leased property in as good condition as when received are liable for failure to do so, though the property was de- stroyed by fire.-Priest v. Foster (Vt.) 78.
Where a tenant is ejected before the expiration of the term, the landlord is liable in damages for the value of the unexpired portion.-Amsden v. Atwood (Vt.) 263.
Priority between landlord's lien and purchase- money chattel mortgage determined.-Ames v. Of legacy, see "Wills." Trenton Brewing Co. (N. J. Ch.) 858.
Tenancies from year to year. Where a landlord, after a lease for years ex-
pired, allowed the tenant to hold over for over a Decision on appeal, see "Appeal and Error."
year, and pay part of the rent for that period, held, that the tenant became a tenant from year
to year.-Amsden v. Atwood (Vt.) 263.
After one has become a tenant from year See "Landlord and Tenant"; "Mines and Min- to year by holding over after expiration of a lease for years, the landlord cannot make the holding conditional upon the performance by the tenant of new duties.-Amsden v. Atwood (Vt.) 263.
Of attachment, see "Attachment." Of execution, see "Execution." Of taxes, see "Taxation."
LIBEL AND SLANDER.
A verdict in a slander suit set aside on the ground that the conduct of plaintiff had in part contributed to the injury of his business, for which injury he claimed special damages.-Libby v. Towle (Me.) 171.
A statement accusing a school supervisor of having burned_text-books held privileged.—Brad- ford v. Clark (Me.) 229.
For keeping hotel, see "Innkeepers."
Of peddlers, see "Hawkers and Peddlers."
Where an itinerant vender obtains a yearly town license to do business so long as he offers for
21, or the lunatic is restored to sound mind.- Smith v. Felter (N. J. Sup.) 746.
Power in will to executor to sell land in five years held not to prevent limitations from run- ning against testator's debts during such time.- Hemphill v. Pry (Pa.) 1020.
A delay of two years in bringing suit after discovery of fraud of trustee held not to put the statute in operation.-Olinger v. Shultz (Pa.) 1024.
voke the defense of limitations.-Duckett v. Na- A participant in a breach of trust cannot in- tional Mechanics' Bank (Md.) 983.
The defense of limitation is not available un- less pleaded.-Duckett v. National Mechanics' Bank (Md.) 983.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.
sale the same kind of goods, but he removes from See "Intoxicating Liquors." the town, he abandons all rights under the license, and on coming back during the year he must pro- cure a new license.-Wolf v. Runnels (Me.) 100.
Where a partner had notice of the appointment of a receiver in supplementary proceedings against his co-partner, his future dealings with
For work and materials, see "Mechanics' his co-partner's interest were at his own risk.- Liens."
Guild v. Meyer (N. J. Ch.) 959.
LOAN COMPANIES.
See "Building and Loan Associations."
One furnishing board to employés of a brick See "Statutes." manufacturer held not entitled to lien under Pub. St. c. 141, § 11.-Perreault v. Shaw (N. H.) 724. General lien for labor or materials furnished for making brick held to attach to all the kilns on which labor was performed or any part of ma- terials was furnished.-Lavoie v. Burke (N. H.) 723; Rowe v. Same, Id.
Of boundaries, see "Boundaries." Of bridges, see "Bridges." Of town line, see "Towns."
A deed to a partnership association, acknowl- edging that the grantor's judgment against one of the partners existed against his interest in See "Beneficial Associations." the land conveyed, held to create an express_lien on such real estate. In re Fair Hope North Sav- age Fire-Brick Co.'s Estate (Pa.) 519; Appeal of Boyts, Id.
Where a fund held in trust for a person for life and another in remainder was invested in a mortgage, and profits were realized on fore- closure, such profits were to be apportioned in the proportion that the principal represented by the investment bore to the interest in ar- rears and also represented by the investment. -Parker v. Seeley (N. J. Ch.) 280.
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS.
An action against an administrator appointed while Pub. St. c. 189, § 8, was in force may be brought within three years from notice of ad- ministrator's appointment.-Gunn v. Kelliher (R. 1.) 8.
The statute does not begin to run against an infant or lunatic until after the infant becomes
LOGS AND LOGGING.
Duty of lumbering company to exercise rea- sonable diligence in rafting logs determined.- Palmer v. Penobscot Lumbering Ass'n (Me.) 108.
is a survey by one other than the owner as On a sale of logs by the thousand, unless there provided by the statute, no recovery can be had on the purchase price.-Knight v. Burnham (Me.) 168.
Where plaintiff hired to defendant a horse and harness to enable him to haul certain logs, held, that he did not labor on the logs within the stat- ute, so as to entitle him to a lien.-Richardson v. Hoxie (Me.) 142.
The charter of a log-driving company con- strued, and held, that an owner of logs was not entitled to any portion of the reserves of water of the company already accumulated within its dams.-Mullen v. Penobscot Log-Driving Co. (Me.) 557.
The charter of a log-driving company con- strued, and held, that an owner of logs was not entitled to draw' from the company's dams what would be the natural run of the river, so long as the company was retaining it for the ac- quisition of stores of water, provided it needed the same, or would be likely to need it, for driv-
« ՆախորդըՇարունակել » |