Treaties and Executive Agreements: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of ... 85-1, on S. J. Res. 3, ... June 25, 1957 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 14
... opposition to my amendment has in any way been helped . On the contrary , the need has been clearly demonstrated . Let us , therefore , put Mr. Justice Black's opinion under a legal microscope . Let us examine it with the care normally ...
... opposition to my amendment has in any way been helped . On the contrary , the need has been clearly demonstrated . Let us , therefore , put Mr. Justice Black's opinion under a legal microscope . Let us examine it with the care normally ...
Էջ 17
... opposed argu- ments before the courts . This would indicate that the executive branch has misled this committee ; that it has misled the courts ; or that it has inadequately supervised the brief writing of Government attorneys . Section ...
... opposed argu- ments before the courts . This would indicate that the executive branch has misled this committee ; that it has misled the courts ; or that it has inadequately supervised the brief writing of Government attorneys . Section ...
Էջ 25
... oppose the Bricker amendment in its 1957 version with the same vigor with which I opposed it in other years . Senate Joint Resolution 3 of this Congress has the same undesirable and dangerous possibilities that existed in the numerous ...
... oppose the Bricker amendment in its 1957 version with the same vigor with which I opposed it in other years . Senate Joint Resolution 3 of this Congress has the same undesirable and dangerous possibilities that existed in the numerous ...
Էջ 30
... opposition to the present amendment Senate Joint Resolution 3 . Senator Dirksen , do you have any questions at the present time of either of our witnesses today ? Senator DIRKSEN . I was going to ask both Senator Hennings and Senator ...
... opposition to the present amendment Senate Joint Resolution 3 . Senator Dirksen , do you have any questions at the present time of either of our witnesses today ? Senator DIRKSEN . I was going to ask both Senator Hennings and Senator ...
Էջ 37
... opposition that it would take too long for the Congress to act . In that case , people would know what their rights are . Senator KEFAUVER . Then it is your contention , Senator Bricker , that this does not put back to the States the ...
... opposition that it would take too long for the Congress to act . In that case , people would know what their rights are . Senator KEFAUVER . Then it is your contention , Senator Bricker , that this does not put back to the States the ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
3400 Chestnut Street 84th Congress act of Congress adopted advising and consenting American Bar Association armed forces Article authority Bill of Rights Bricker Amendment Cherokee Tobacco Chestnut Street Philadelphia clause College of Law Committee for Defense Constitution 36 West Constitution by Preserving constitutional amendment court-martial Dear Dean Fordham decision delegated executive agreements force or effect foreign affairs internal law international agreement January jurisdiction language Law School legislative effect limitation matter ment military Missouri opinion opposed petitioner Preserving the Treaty President Professor of Law proposed amendment provision pursuance question ratification reservation S. J. Res School of Law Senate Joint Resolution Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Bricker Senator HENNINGS Senator KEFAUVER Sincerely Sixth Amendments statement statute supremacy clause Supreme Court supreme law tion treaties and executive treaty power treatymaking power trial by jury United valid views vote W. J. Schrenk West 44th Street York 36
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 27 - The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
Էջ 22 - ... anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it; the other never to formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied.
Էջ 441 - Acts of Congress are the supreme law of the land only when made in pursuance of the Constitution, while treaties are declared to be so when made under the authority of the United States. It is open to question whether the authority of the United States means more than the formal acts prescribed to make the convention.
Էջ 53 - For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do ? Why, for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed...
Էջ 30 - If the State having the primary right decides not to exercise jurisdiction, it shall notify the authorities of the other State as soon as practicable. The authorities of the State having the primary right shall give sympathetic consideration to a request from the authorities of the other State for a waiver of its right in cases where the other State considers such waiver to be of particular importance".
Էջ 162 - All retainers to the camp and all persons accompanying or serving with the armies of the United States without the territorial jurisdiction of the United States...
Էջ 141 - China having expressed a strong desire to reform her judicial system and to bring it into accord with that of Western nations, Great Britain...
Էջ 53 - ... for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government.
Էջ 343 - A provision of a treaty which conflicts with any provision of this Constitution shall not be of any force or effect.
Էջ 28 - Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.