Treaties and Executive Agreements: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of ... 85-1, on S. J. Res. 3, ... June 25, 1957 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 69–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ
... Persons who testified on prior versions of the Bricker amendment ... The Bricker amendment , a statement by Hon . Alexander Wiley as printed in the Congressional Record dated June 14 , 1957 , submitted by Hon . Thomas C. Hennings , Jr ...
... Persons who testified on prior versions of the Bricker amendment ... The Bricker amendment , a statement by Hon . Alexander Wiley as printed in the Congressional Record dated June 14 , 1957 , submitted by Hon . Thomas C. Hennings , Jr ...
Էջ 14
... persons are subject to the code : ( 11 ) Subject to the provisions of any treaty or agreement to which the United States is or may be a party or to any accepted rule of international law , all persons serving with , employed by , or ...
... persons are subject to the code : ( 11 ) Subject to the provisions of any treaty or agreement to which the United States is or may be a party or to any accepted rule of international law , all persons serving with , employed by , or ...
Էջ 24
... persons not having a military status , other than dependents . Nor do we have before us a case involving a noncapital crime . This narrow delineation of the issue is merely to respect the important restric- tions binding on the Court ...
... persons not having a military status , other than dependents . Nor do we have before us a case involving a noncapital crime . This narrow delineation of the issue is merely to respect the important restric- tions binding on the Court ...
Էջ 26
... person who seeks to limit the action of this country in foreign affairs could find in that history something to urge upon the courts in support of a desired limitation . Regardless of any other questions concerning this proposal , one ...
... person who seeks to limit the action of this country in foreign affairs could find in that history something to urge upon the courts in support of a desired limitation . Regardless of any other questions concerning this proposal , one ...
Էջ 31
... person of the petitioner . He further alleges that his detention is illegal and in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States , as well as the treaty rights and obligations of the Government of the United States , and ...
... person of the petitioner . He further alleges that his detention is illegal and in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States , as well as the treaty rights and obligations of the Government of the United States , and ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
3400 Chestnut Street 84th Congress act of Congress adopted advising and consenting American Bar Association armed forces Article authority Bill of Rights Bricker Amendment Cherokee Tobacco Chestnut Street Philadelphia clause College of Law Committee for Defense Constitution 36 West Constitution by Preserving constitutional amendment court-martial Dear Dean Fordham decision delegated executive agreements force or effect foreign affairs internal law international agreement January jurisdiction language Law School legislative effect limitation matter ment military Missouri opinion opposed petitioner Preserving the Treaty President Professor of Law proposed amendment provision pursuance question ratification reservation S. J. Res School of Law Senate Joint Resolution Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Bricker Senator HENNINGS Senator KEFAUVER Sincerely Sixth Amendments statement statute supremacy clause Supreme Court supreme law tion treaties and executive treaty power treatymaking power trial by jury United valid views vote W. J. Schrenk West 44th Street York 36
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 27 - The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
Էջ 22 - ... anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it; the other never to formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied.
Էջ 441 - Acts of Congress are the supreme law of the land only when made in pursuance of the Constitution, while treaties are declared to be so when made under the authority of the United States. It is open to question whether the authority of the United States means more than the formal acts prescribed to make the convention.
Էջ 53 - For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do ? Why, for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed...
Էջ 30 - If the State having the primary right decides not to exercise jurisdiction, it shall notify the authorities of the other State as soon as practicable. The authorities of the State having the primary right shall give sympathetic consideration to a request from the authorities of the other State for a waiver of its right in cases where the other State considers such waiver to be of particular importance".
Էջ 162 - All retainers to the camp and all persons accompanying or serving with the armies of the United States without the territorial jurisdiction of the United States...
Էջ 141 - China having expressed a strong desire to reform her judicial system and to bring it into accord with that of Western nations, Great Britain...
Էջ 53 - ... for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government.
Էջ 343 - A provision of a treaty which conflicts with any provision of this Constitution shall not be of any force or effect.
Էջ 28 - Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.