Trucking Mergers and Concentration: Hearings Before ... 85-1 on Mergers and Possible Growth of Concentration in the Trucking Industry, and an Appendix Entitled "Trucking Mergers, Concentration, and Small Business: Analysis of Interstate Commerce Commission Policy, 1950-56" ... July 1, 2, 11, and 12, 1957 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
25 largest acquisition ADAMS Allied Allied Van Lines antitrust appendix average class I carriers Commission approval Commission's committee common carriers common control companies competition concentration Congress Consolidated costs decisions dormant economic efficiency fact filed firms Freight Lines giant haul haulers hearing examiner Hendry household movers increase interline Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission JOHN SPARKMAN Keeshin largest carriers Law & Ingham merger applications mergers and acquisitions MITCHELL Motor Carrier Act Motor Freight motor-carrier operating ratios operating rights opinion Pacific Intermountain Express percent petroleum points proceedings proposed protestants public interest purchase question railroads record regulation revenues in 1955 route Senator SCHOEPPEL Senator THYE shipments shippers Small Business small carriers Sparkman statement statistics Storage STULTS tion total operating revenues traffic transaction Truck Lines truckers trucking industry United United Van Lines vendee vendor Wheaton Van Lines
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 10 - to inquire into and report on the management of the business of all common carriers subject to the provisions of this part * * * and the Commission shall keep itself informed as to the manner and method in which the same are conducted."
Էջ 219 - from the operation of the antitrust laws and of all other restraints, limitations, and prohibitions of law, Federal, State, or municipal, insofar as may be necessary to enable them to carry into effect the transactions so approved, and to hold, maintain, and operate any properties and exercise any control or franchises acquired through such transaction.
Էջ 214 - The Attorney General shall have the right to intervene and appear in said proceeding and any person may make application, and upon good cause shown may be allowed by the Commission or Board, to intervene and appear in said proceeding by counsel or in person
Էջ 214 - That authority to enforce compliance with sections 2, 3, 7, and 8 of this Act by the persons respectively subject thereto is hereby vested in the Interstate Commerce Commission where applicable to common carriers subject to the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended
Էջ 38 - objective of— developing, coordinating, and preserving a national transportation system by water, highway, and rail, as well as other means, adequate to meet the needs of the
Էջ 214 - reason to believe that any person is violating or has violated any of the provisions of sections 2, 3, 7, and 8 of this Act, it shall issue and serve upon such person and the Attorney General a complaint stating its charges in that respect
Էջ 117 - transportation system by water, highway, and rail, adequate to meet the needs of the commerce of the United States, the postal service, and the national defense.
Էջ 125 - authorized consolidation may obtain immunity from prosecution under the antitrust laws in no sense relieves the Commission of its duty, as an administrative matter, to consider the effect of the merger on competitors and on the general competitive situation in the industry in the light of
Էջ 219 - to give weight to the following considerations, among others: "(1) The effect of the proposed transaction upon adequate transportation service to the public, * * * (3) the total fixed charges resulting from the
Էջ 290 - consistent with the public interest and will enable such carrier to use service by motor vehicle to public advantage in its [rail] operations and will not unduly restrain competition.