. Wood v. North Carolina Page 1090 1071 1155 912,1176 978,998 1091 1068 1191 864 1062 839 1096 1036,1179 1169 1028,1179 947 934 908 930 945 901 980 847 829,1030 980 834 835 839 840 1060 1167 942 980 1156 929 1181 865 970 906 1161 993 1001 1177 1071 . . Page Workman; Ciempa v. 946 Workman; Marquez v. 899 Workman; Martin v. 990 Workman; Monge Delgado v. 930 Workman; Shaw v. 989 Workman v. Summers 1189 Worley v. United States 864,1109 Worley v. U. S. Court of Appeals 1093 Wormsley v. United States 1111 W. R. Grace & Co.; Marsh v. 810 W. R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., L. L. C. v. BT Securities Corp. 873 Wright v. Montgomery County 810 Wright; Pierce v. 901 Wright v. United States 806,863,896,949,970,978,982,1085 Wright v. West 936 Wright v. Yates 1025 WTMX Radio Network; Miles v. 1088 Wu v. Gonzales 1150 Wu v. Salt Lake County Comm'n 850 Wubker v. Cain 1161 Wyatt v. United States 1172 Wyche v. Crosby 1160 Wyeth v. Smart 960 Wynn v. United States 993,1102 Wynter v. Burge 896,1031 Wyoming; Kenyon v. 1175 Wyoming; Sarr v. 801 Wyoming; Watters v. 905 Wyss v. Hoquiam 1051 Xayasenesouk v. Payne 883 Xechem Int'l v. University of Tex. M. D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. .. 1149 Xiangwen Wu v. Salt Lake County Comm'n 850 Yanez-Govea v. United States 1128,1180 Yant v. Gundy 1006 Yaracs v. Summit Academy 1147 Yarbor v. United States 1101 Yarborough; Anderson v. 850,1164 Yarborough; Birdwell v. 877 Yarborough; Bode v. 1066 Yarborough; Boscaino v. 1027 Yarborough; Delgado Parreno v. 1069 Yarborough; Edwards v. 851 Yarborough; Gonzales v. 1023 Yarborough; Guillory v. 857 . Yarborough; Henderson v. Page 1184 944 1165 832,1082 1060 948 1190 882 1161 890 831 889 1126 1028 1008 907 1165 1025 1120 838 945 1025 1064 967 871 1002 1076 854 808,954,1045,1088 1160 827 1049 894 802 1046 964 1100,1104,1110 1157 907 1048 863,1031 832 865 905 Page Yukins; Petit v. 1168 983 1012 918 1055 1057 968 807 1071 950 879 1105 1035,1178 1054 842 1046 . . 864 1055 1074 822 863 1082 824 1188 819 1189 1101 896 959 1150 808 1013 988 882 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AT OCTOBER TERM, 2004 LEOCAL v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 03-583. Argued October 12, 2004—Decided November 9, 2004 Petitioner, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, pleaded guilty to two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and causing serious bodily injury in an accident, in violation of Florida law. While he was serving his prison sentence, the Immigration and Naturalization Service initiated removal proceedings pursuant to $ 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which permits deportation of an alien convicted of "an aggravated felony.” INA $ 101(a)(43)(F) defines "aggravated felony” to include, inter alia, “a crime of violence [as defined in 18 U.S. C. $ 16] for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year.” Title 18 U. S. C. § 16(a), in turn, defines “crime of violence” as “an offense that has as an element the use ... of physical force against the person or property of another,” and $ 16(b) defines it as "any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.” An Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals ordered petitioner's deportation, and the Eleventh Circuit dismissed his petition for review, relying on its precedent that a conviction under Florida's DUI statute is a crime of violence under 18 U. S. C. $ 16. Held: State DUI offenses such as Florida's, which either do not have a mens rea component or require only a showing of negligence in the |