United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Հատոր 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 13
... fact does not warrant our shoehorning it into statutory sections where it does not fit . The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is therefore reversed , and the case is remanded for further ...
... fact does not warrant our shoehorning it into statutory sections where it does not fit . The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is therefore reversed , and the case is remanded for further ...
Էջ 24
... fact does not alter the essentially maritime nature of the contracts . In Kossick , for example , we held that a shipowner's promise. to. assume. responsibility. for. any. improper. treatment. his. seaman might receive at a New York ...
... fact does not alter the essentially maritime nature of the contracts . In Kossick , for example , we held that a shipowner's promise. to. assume. responsibility. for. any. improper. treatment. his. seaman might receive at a New York ...
Էջ 44
... fact or circumstance which a fact - finder could reasonably deem to have mitigating value . ” ” ” Id . , at 284,285 ( quoting Mckoy v . v North Carolina , 494 U. S. 433 , 440 ( 1990 ) ) . The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals relied on ...
... fact or circumstance which a fact - finder could reasonably deem to have mitigating value . ” ” ” Id . , at 284,285 ( quoting Mckoy v . v North Carolina , 494 U. S. 433 , 440 ( 1990 ) ) . The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals relied on ...
Էջ 48
... fact that the “ jury was essentially instructed to return a false answer to a special issue in order to avoid a death sentence . ” Penry II , 532 U. S. , at 801 . There is no principled distinction , for Eighth Amendment purposes ...
... fact that the “ jury was essentially instructed to return a false answer to a special issue in order to avoid a death sentence . ” Penry II , 532 U. S. , at 801 . There is no principled distinction , for Eighth Amendment purposes ...
Էջ 70
... fact that “ subparagraph ” refers to a third - level subdivision within a section , denominated by a capital letter ( here subparagraph ( A ) ) , see ante , at 60–62 , the Court's analysis proceeds in five steps . First , the Court ...
... fact that “ subparagraph ” refers to a third - level subdivision within a section , denominated by a capital letter ( here subparagraph ( A ) ) , see ante , at 60–62 , the Court's analysis proceeds in five steps . First , the Court ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
11th Cir acceptance action alien allow Amendment applied Appx argued argument Ashcroft Attorney authority Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital cause Certiorari denied Circuit circumstances claim clause conduct Congress consider constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL Court of Appeals crime criminal curiae damages death penalty decision defendant DEPARTMENT Dept determination DIRECTOR dissenting Dist District Court Dretke ET AL evidence fact federal filed finding Florida Government granted Guidelines held holding imposed inmates interest issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury JUSTICE Kansas limitation meaning ment Michigan October offense officer opinion parties person petitioner presented prison provision punishment question reason removal Reported requirement respondent rule Secretary sentencing Services Smith Special standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS subparagraph supra Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial United violation WARDEN