Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, Հատոր 1 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
A. E. Wait act of Congress action admitted affirmed alleged amended answer appears applicable attorney authority Benton County BOISE bond cause certificate Circuit Court City of Portland Clackamas County claim claimant clerk complaint contract counsel county commissioners CYRUS OLNEY DEADY deceased decree deed Defendant in Error demurrer District Court dollars donation act election entitled evidence execution fact fendant ferry filed ground indictment intended issue J. G. WILSON judge judgment jury justice land legislature libellant license lien lots Lownsdale ment misjoinder mortgage motion Multnomah Multnomah County notice OLNEY owner party person Pettigrove pilot plaintiff in error plat pleadings poll-book Port Townsend possession proceedings provides question record repealed reversed rule says settler sheriff Simonds Stark statute steamship suit Supreme Court taken term Territory of Oregon thereof tion town trial Umpqua County verdict votes Willamette Falls WILLIAMS witness
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 252 - In other words, as the rule is now more briefly expressed, "parol contemporaneous evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary the terms of a valid written instrument.
Էջ 245 - No indictment is insufficient, nor can the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form, which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant, upon the merits.
Էջ 368 - CD, of , of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have bargained and sold, and by these presents do grant and convey unto the said party of the second part...
Էջ 176 - ... at any time within six years next before the commencement of the suit," and to this answer the plaintiff demurs.
Էջ 192 - That either or both may (if they see fit) punish such an offender, cannot be doubted. Yet it cannot be truly averred that the offender has been twice punished for the same offense; but only that by one act he has committed two offenses, for each of which he is justly punishable. He could not plead the punishment by one in bar to a conviction by the other; consequently, this court has decided, in the case of Fox v.
Էջ 302 - new grant.' since it is an undisputed principle, that the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of his adversaries.
Էջ 304 - It was very justly observed by a great judge : that 'all questions upon the rules of evidence are of vast importance to all orders and degrees of men; our lives, our liberty, and our property are all concerned in the support of these rules, which have been matured by the wisdom of ages, and are now revered from their antiquity and the good sense in which they are founded.
Էջ 196 - ... to be done, shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last; and if the last be Sunday, it shall be excluded.
Էջ 30 - That if any person shall sell, exchange, or give, barter, or dispose of, any spirituous liquor or wine to an Indian, (in the Indian country,) such person shall forfeit and pay the sum of five hundred dollars...
Էջ 8 - SEC. 4. The first session of the Board of Education shall be held at the seat of government, on the first Monday of December, after their election; after which the General Assembly may fix the time and place of meeting.