 If the person injured is himself an employee of the company, and the damage was caused by another employee, and without fault or negligence on the part of the person injured, his employment by the company shall be no bar to the recovery [of damages].  The Southern Reporter - Стр. 1501899Полный просмотр - Подробнее о книге
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1883 - Страниц: 926
...the person suing is himself an employ^ of the company, and the damage was caused by another employe, and without fault or negligence on the part of the...employment by the company shall be no bar to a recovery. Prior to 1856 there was no right of action by an employe whatever when the injury was caused by the... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1881 - Страниц: 876
...person injured is himself an employee of tiie company, and the damage was caused by another employee, and without fault or negligence on the part of the...injured, his employment by the company shall be no bar to the recovery." This means, clearly, if the damage was caused by another employee, and was not caused... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1868 - Страниц: 480
...is himself an employee of the Company, and the damige was caused by another employee, without fault or negligence on the part of the person injured, his employment by the company would be no bar to the recovery, and, ;herefore, negatively, that it would constitute a bar if fault... | |
 | 1875 - Страниц: 870
...any manner connected with the operation of any railway, on or about which they shall be employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding." The supreme court of that state has given its construction to the latter statute, by construing the act... | |
 | 1908 - Страниц: 1118
...connected with the use and operation of any railway on or "about which they shall be employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding." The second section of the act expressly declares that no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1881 - Страниц: 828
...any railway on or about which they shall be VOL. LIV— 15. Pyne v. The C., B. & QR Co. employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding." The first act of the legislature making railroad companies liable for damages sustained by employes, in... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - Страниц: 962
...manner connected with the use and operation of any railway on or about which they shall be employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding." The first act of the legislature making railroad companies liable for damages sustained by employees, in... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1883 - Страниц: 924
...the person suing is himself an employ^ of the company, and the damage was caused by another employe, and without fault or negligence on the part of the...employment by the company shall be no bar to a recovery. Prior to 1856 there was no right of action by an employe whatever when the injury was caused by the... | |
 | Charles G. Fall - 1883 - Страниц: 200
...person injured is himself an employee of the company, and the damage was caused by another employee, and without fault or negligence on the part of the...person injured, his employment by the company shall he no bar to the recovery." The old law is laid down in 15 Ga. 349 ; 30 Ga. 146. The new law was enacted... | |
 | 1891 - Страниц: 1200
...connected with the use and operation of any railway, on or about which they shall be employed, and no contract which restricts such liability shall be legal or binding." The modification introduced by the later etatute isthat the wrongs for which the corporation is to be liable... | |
| |
