 | 1866 - 932 էջ
...dangerous, that lead would be proper and less slippery, and that there should be a hand-rail : — Held, there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. The first count of the declaration stated that the defendants were possessed of a staircase leading to... | |
 | Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, John Paxton Norman - 1861 - 1008 էջ
...decision of the Court of Appeal is, whether or not the defendants are entitled to have a new trial on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jnry under the first count of the declaration, assuming it was true, as sworn, that everything had... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1864 - 562 էջ
...points, it must be taken that the jury have found that there was negligence; and then it is contended that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury, and that if there was, the defts. were protected by the exceptions in the bill of lading. The bill... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1870 - 756 էջ
...and leave was reserved to the defendants to move to enter a nonsuit if the Court should be of opinion that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury — the defendants undertaking, in the event of the rule being made absolute, not to ask for costs. THE COURT... | |
 | Maxwell Alexander Robertson - 1866 - 1190 էջ
...verdict was found for the plaintiff, with leave to the defendants to move to enter a nonsuit, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. A rule having been obtained pursuant to such leave, and also for a new trial, Huddleston and II. James... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1868 - 416 էջ
...300/.; leave being reserved to the defendants to move to enter a nonsuit or a verdict for them, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury. A rule having been obtained accordingly, or for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against... | |
 | Louis Arthur Goodeve - 1874 - 704 էջ
...a verdict was taken by consent for the plaintiff, subject to leave reserved to set it aside on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence, to go to the jury. A rule was accordingly obtained in the Court of Common Pleas, and was after argument discharged. Upon... | |
 | Henry Godefroi, John Shortt - 1869 - 972 էջ
...section — nu-amuR of " necessary." 8 £ 9 vicT. c. 20. rail It was held by the Court of Common Pleas, that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury : (Grafter v. Metropolitan Railway Co., 35 LJ (CP) 132.) (») It was held by the Vice- Chancellor of... | |
 | 1875 - 438 էջ
...by Bramwell, B., Mellor, J., Pollock and Amphlett, BB. (Cockburn, CJ, and Cleasby, B., dissenting), that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury, i'.'iis v. The Great Western Railway Company, LR, LX, CP (Ex. Ch.) 551. SAM: OF GOODS. Payment of price:... | |
| |
The ruling was in form that there was no evidence of negligence to go to the jury... 
