...except as to Part III. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 (1963), this Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment." The issue in the present case concerns the standard of materiality to be applied in determining...

...guilty of crimes for which they had been sentenced to death. The Brady court held that the suppression of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates...punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith "In re Simone Fruit Co. , 53 Agric. Dec. 537 (1994) (Ruling on Certified Question); In re AP Holt (Decision...

...US 607. Cf . Durley v. Mayo, 351 US 277, 285 (dissenting opinion). We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. The principle of Mooney v. Holohan is not punishment of society for misdeeds of a prosecutor but avoidance...

...84-91. (a) Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused who has requested it violates due process where the evidence is material...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. Pp. 86-88. (b) When the Court of Appeals restricted petitioner's new trial to the question of punishment,...

...of the controlling principle a reference to counsel's request — "We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. . . ." 3 — I see no reason to make the result turn on the adventitious circumstance of a request....

...hearing is discovery of the prosecution's witness and evidence. In Brady, the court held that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...due process where the evidence is material either to the guilt or to punishment of the accused, irrespective of the good faith or Imd faith of the prosecution....

...(1963), and hence must be preserved. In Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...or bad faith of the prosecution." (373 US at 87.) We have previously held that the formal memoranda of interviews conducted by IRS agents of taxpayers...

...Supreme Court decision in the 1963 case Brady v. Maryland in which the Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution?" Mr. BOUCHER. I am familiar with that case. Mr. TWARDY. There is a 1958 Supreme Court decision, Napue...

...v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 104, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 1196-1197, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215, held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." Thus, Brady requires the...

...in favor of the defendant. Arady v. Maryland says that all material "favorable -to an accused . . . where the evidence is material either to guilt or...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution," oust be supplied to defendant andjiis counsel. Thus, • worthy prosccutorial motive in secreting tapes...