Timber Industry Practices in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska: Oversight Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Mining, Forest Management, and Bonneville Power Administration of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, on Timber Industry Practices in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska, Hearing Held in Washington, D.C., June 29, 1983
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Mining, Forest Management, and Bonneville Power Administration
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 - 410 էջ
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
action additional administrative agreement Agriculture antitrust Antitrust Division appears appraisal Attorney basis cedar Chairman Civil claims competition concern continuing contract Corporation costs Counsel court criminal damages decision defendants Department of Justice determine developed discussed district Division documents effect established evidence Exhibit fact File findings Forest Service FURTH further going Government HUCKABY increase independent indicates industry Ketchikan laws letter loggers long-term Lumber Management matter needed obtain occurred offered Office operations period PETERSON possible potential practices profit Pulp Company pulp mills purchase question reason recommendations records redetermination referred Regional Reid Brothers request result rule SANDOR SEIBERLING shows sold Southeast Alaska specific statement stumpage Subcommittee supply timber sales Tongass National Forest trial United values violations volume WEAVER
Էջ 242 - . . .a finding is 'clearly erroneous" when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co.. et al. 333 US 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525,
Էջ 233 - conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not . exceeding one million dollars if a corporation, or, if any other person, one hundred thousand dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the
Էջ 261 - by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice. The court at every stage of the proceeding
Էջ 252 - Waiver. The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule and to file it as required by Rule '5(d) constitutes a waiver by him of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties.
Էջ 233 - Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 USC-.A. § 1) provides : Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any
Էջ 261 - Rule 61 provides : No error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence and no error or defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or
Էջ 256 - Any action to enforce any cause of action under section 15, 15a, or 15c of this title shall be forever barred unless commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued.
Էջ 242 - more precise proof,' the factfinder may "conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference from the proof of defendants' wrongful acts and their tendency to injure plaintiffs' business, and from the evidence of the decline in prices, profits and values, not shown to be attributable to other causes, that defendants' wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs.
Էջ 358 - shall investigate, at the seat of government or elsewhere, all matters relating to the receipt, disbursement, and application of public funds. The