...accordance with these rules. Rule 23. Class Actions. (a) REPRESENTATION. If persons constituting a class are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, such of them, one or more, as will fairly insure the adequate representation of all may, on...

...CCA xxix) reads: "When the question is one of common or general interest to many persons constituting a. class so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the whole." the citizens of the United States. Some of these...

...to enforce it. When the question is one of common or general interest to many persons, constituting a class so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the whole. Story's Equity Pleadings (10th Ed.) § 97; Federal...

...F.) "When the question Is one of common or general Interest to many persons constituting a class BO numerous as to make It Impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the whole." This rule formerly was qualified by the following...

...cestuis que trustent must be made parties to foreclosure has an important exception, where they are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court. This subject, in its application to mortgage deeds of trust, is discussed elsewhere;* but it...

...persons, and the case of Brainerd v. Bertram, 5 Abb. NC 102, where it was held that 40 persons, were not so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, are not authorities against the conclusion I have reached, for the reason that they were each...

...and the case of Brainerd v. Bertram, 5 Abb. NC 102, where it was held that forty persons, were not so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, are not authorities against the conclusion I have reached, for the reason that they were each...

...parties defendant to this proceeding; and the plaintiff alleged that the heirs at law of testatrix were so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court within a reasonable time, and asked the court to designate JW Crawford and Oswald Thomas (two...

...the controversy should be one of common or general interest to many persons; and (b) the parties are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court. In the case at bench, each impleaded occupant of the properties subject matter of this case,...

...in the name of one of a class for the benefit of all who have a common or general interest, and are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court, is given by statute; an allegation that the plaintiffs brought the action without the knowledge of the...