United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Հատոր 511United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1997 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 94
... respondents can show that it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alter- natives . Neither of respondents ' justifications passes strict scrutiny . For the surcharge to be ...
... respondents can show that it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alter- natives . Neither of respondents ' justifications passes strict scrutiny . For the surcharge to be ...
Էջ 100
... Respondents argue , and the Oregon Supreme Court held , that the statutory nexus between the surcharge and " the [ otherwise uncompensated ] costs to the State of Oregon and its political subdivisions of disposing of solid waste ...
... Respondents argue , and the Oregon Supreme Court held , that the statutory nexus between the surcharge and " the [ otherwise uncompensated ] costs to the State of Oregon and its political subdivisions of disposing of solid waste ...
Էջ 101
... respondents have not presented . No claim has been made that the dis- posal of waste from other States imposes higher costs on Oregon and its political subdivisions than the disposal of in- state waste.5 Also , respondents have not ...
... respondents have not presented . No claim has been made that the dis- posal of waste from other States imposes higher costs on Oregon and its political subdivisions than the disposal of in- state waste.5 Also , respondents have not ...
Էջ 102
... Respondents offer two such reasons , each of which we address below . A Respondents ' principal defense of the higher surcharge on out - of - state waste is that it is a " compensatory tax " neces- sary to make shippers of such waste ...
... Respondents offer two such reasons , each of which we address below . A Respondents ' principal defense of the higher surcharge on out - of - state waste is that it is a " compensatory tax " neces- sary to make shippers of such waste ...
Էջ 104
... Respondents ' failure to identify a specific charge on intrastate commerce equal to or exceeding the surcharge is fatal to their claim . See Maryland , 451 U. S. , at 758 . Respondents argue that , despite the absence of a specific ...
... Respondents ' failure to identify a specific charge on intrastate commerce equal to or exceeding the surcharge is fatal to their claim . See Maryland , 451 U. S. , at 758 . Respondents argue that , despite the absence of a specific ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Հատոր 320 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1944 |
Common terms and phrases
action aiding and abetting amici curiae apply argued the cause Attorney authority bankruptcy BLACKMUN brief C. A. 9th Cir California cert Certiorari denied civil claim Clarkstown Commerce Clause concurring in judgment Congress constitutional Corp Court of Appeals criminal damages decision defendant Dept discrimination dissenting District Court dormant Commerce Clause double jeopardy drug drug paraphernalia effect Eighth Amendment employees enactment enforcement Equal Protection Clause federal fees FERC foreclosure gift tax GINSBURG Government hazardous waste imposed imprisonment intent interest interpretation interstate commerce judicial jurors jury JUSTICE legislative liability litigation mens rea ment O'CONNOR offense Opinion original sentence out-of-state peremptory challenges petitioner petitioner's protection provides punishment reasonable doubt regulation Reported respondents retroactive rule SCALIA Section sentence of probation Sixth Amendment solid waste SOUTER Stat statute statutory STEVENS Supp supra tariff term tion Town of Clarkstown transfer trial uncounseled United violation water quality