Page images
PDF
EPUB

Legal prerogatives of the Crown untouched at the Revolution-but now prac-
tically vested in its responsible Ministers-Note on Convocation-Personal

influence of the Sovereign-Causes which tended to induce its decline—

Reaches its lowest point under George I. and George II.-Long struggle of
George III. against the Ministerial System-Character of the King-
-Disastrous effects of his policy-His wretched education-His determina-
tion to govern-His secret counsellors-Premiership of Lord Bute, 1762—
His sudden fall-Continued secret influence-Ultimate dismissal from
Court-Arbitrary measures of the King during the Bute and Grenville
ministries-The Rockingham ministry, 1765-Organised opposition in Par-
liament by the 'King's friends to repeal of the Stamp Act-Ministry of
Grafton and Pitt, 1766-Influence of the King attains its maximum during
Lord North's Ministry, 1770-82-The Royal veto-Mr. Dunning's Resolu-
tions on the influence of the Crown, 1780-Fall of Lord North's Ministry,
1782-Rockingham again Premier-Ministry of Lord Shelburne, 1782-The
Coalition Ministry, 1783-Opposition of the King's friends' to Fox's India
Bill, 1783-Declaration of the Commons against the use of the King's name
-Abrupt dismissal of the Coalition Ministry, 1783-Critical relations of the
King and Parliament-Mr. Pitt premier, 1783-General election of 1784-
Triumph of Pitt and the King-The King's personal influence diminished-
but still very powerful-Diminution of personal influence of the Sovereign
since the reign of George III.-Its occasional assertion-Sudden dismissal
of Lord Melbourne's Ministry by William IV., 1834-Short Premiership of
Sir Robert Peel, followed by recall of the Melbourne Ministry, 1835-The
'Bedchamber question,' 1839-Sir Robert Peel's Resolution of want of
confidence in the Ministry, 1841-He becomes Premier-The Queen's
Memorandum on the relations of a Secretary of State to the Crown, 1850-
Constitutional right of dismissing a Minister-asserted in the removal of
Lord Palmerston from the Foreign Secretaryship, 1851-Increased power of
the Executive-Revenues of the Crown-The Civil list-Crown lands-
Private property of the Sovereign.

PAGE

571-592

Number of members-Defects of the Representative system-Scottish represen-

tation-Irish representation-Bribery of members-Parliamentary Reform

advocated by Lord Chatham in 1766-Wilkes' scheme of reform, 1776-Mr.

Pitt's advocacy of reform, 1782-85-The question revived after the Peace of

1815-Passing of the Reform Act of 1832-The principal provisions-The

Scotch and Irish Reform Acts, 1832-The Reform Act of 1867-Scotch and

Irish Reform Acts, 1868-Electors of the United Kingdom-Suppression of

bribery and intimidation at Elections-The Ballot Act, 1872-Summons,

duration and intermission of Parliament-The Parliament of 1399-Conven-

tion Parliament of 1660-Convention Parliament of 1688-Triennial Act,

1641-Triennial Act, 1694-Septennial Act, 1716-Attempts to repeal the

Septennial Act-Abrogation of old rule that Parliament was dissolved by

death of the Sovereign-Privilege of Parliament since the Revolution-

sometimes wielded by the Executive for oppression of popular liberty-Ex-
pulsion of Sir R. Steele, 1714-Proceedings against Wilkes, 1763-His
expulsion from the House-Declared incapable of re-election, 1768-The
declaration expunged from the Journal of the Commons, 1782-Disqualifi-
cation of Members-Cases of Smith O'Brien, 1849, O'Donovan Rossa, 1870,
John Mitchell, 1875-Abuse of Privilege of Commitment-Case of the
printer Mist, 1721-Case of Mr. Alex. Murray, 1751-Case of Sir Francis
Burdett, 1810-Publication of Debates-Motives for secrecy-The 'Diurnal
Occurrences of Parliament': 1641-1660-Votes and proceedings ordered to
be printed, 1680-Debates published anonymously-Complaints of unfair-
ness-Contest with the Printers, 1771-and with the Lord Mayor and
Aldermen of London-The Lord Mayor (Brass Crosby) and Alderman
Oliver committed to the Tower-Reporting still a breach of privilege-Ex-
clusion of Strangers-Resolution of the House, 1875-Facilities afforded for
reporting-Publication of Division lists-and of Parliamentary_Reports
and papers-Political results of reporting-Conflict between the Commons
and Courts of Law as to publication of papers affecting character-Stock-
dale v. Hansard-Right of Parliament to publish established by Act 3 & 4
Vict. c. 9-Wason v. Walter, 1868

[ocr errors]

Toleration Act, 1689-Toleration only partially established-Temporary reaction
under Anne-Acts against Occasional Conformity and the Growth of
Schism, 1711, 1713-Annual Indemnity Acts under George II.-Lord Hard-
wicke's Marriage Act, 1753-Relaxation of religious penal code under
George III.-Principles of Toleration upheld in Judgment of House of Lords
in case of the City of London and the Dissenters, 1767-Roman Catholic Relief
Acts, 1778 and 1791-Statutes relieving Dissenters from Religious disabilities
-Their Civil disabilities-Early attempts at Relief-Repeal of Test and Cor-
poration Acts, 1828-Roman Ćatholic Emancipation Act, 1829-Repeal of
penalties affecting Roman Catholic religion and education-Completion of
Civil enfranchisement of Dissenters-Jewish Disabilities—Admission of Jews
to Parliament, 1858-Civil registration of births, marriages, and deaths,
1836-Dissenters' Marriage Bill, 1836-Universities Tests Act, 1871

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

599-623

623-631

English

Constitutional History.

CHAPTER I.

FROM THE TEUTONIC CONQUEST OF BRITAIN TO THE NORMAN

CONQUEST OF ENGLAND.

THE first step in a history of the Institutions of the English people Origin of the English. is to determine the elements of the English nationality. It is not unusual to speak of the English as a mixed race formed out of the fusion of the Britons, the Anglo-Saxons, the Danes, and the Normans; but this form of expression is apt to convey an erroneous idea of the facts. No modern European nation is, indeed, of pure unmingled race; yet in all some one element has maintained a clear and decided predominance. In the English people this predominant element is the German or Teutonic. The Teutonic conquest of Teutonic Britain was something more than a mere conquest of the country: it conquest of Britain, was in all senses a national occupation, a sustained immigration of a A.D. 450new race, whose numbers, during a hundred and fifty years, were continually being augmented by fresh arrivals from the Fatherland.'

Before the end of the 6th century, the Teutonic invaders had established a dominion in Britain, extending from the German Ocean to the Severn and from the English Channel to the Firth of Forth. The Britons were soon driven into the western parts of the island, where they maintained themselves for a time in several small states. The

1[Cf. Tacitus, Agricola, cap. 28, "Cohors Usipiorum per Germanias conscripta et in Britanniam transmissa.' It is possible that from this expedition a knowledge of Britain may have found its way to the north of Germany.-ED.]

[Cf. Lappenberg, Geschichte von England (1834), i. 122; Gneist, The Hist. of the English Constitution (1891), p. 2 et seq.; and Hannis Taylor, Origin and Growth of the Engl. Const. (1889), for the "Teutonic theory."-ED.]

с.н.

B

600.

of Races;

remnant of the country which they retained was indeed at first of considerable extent, including not only modern Wales but the great kingdom of Strathclyde, stretching from Dumbarton to Chester, together with Cornwall, Devon, and part of Somerset. But the eastern boundary of this territory yielded more and more to the influence of the invaders; and it was only in the mountains of Wales and Cumbria that the Britons preserved for any length of time their No general ever-decreasing independence. During the long-continued and commixture peculiarly ferocious series of contests between the natives and invaders, vast numbers of the flower of the British race perished. Many Britons sought refuge in emigration to the Continent. Not a few of the less warlike doubtless remained as slaves to the conquerors, and a still greater infusion of the Celtic element may have been effected by the intermarriages of the victors with the women of the vanquished 1 But the Germanic element has always constituted the main stream of our race, absorbing in its course and assimilating each of the other elements. It is the paternal element in our system natural and political.' Since the first immigration, each infusion of new blood has but served to add intensity to the national Teutonic element. The Danes were very closely allied in race, language, and institutions to the people whom they invaded; and the Normans, though speaking a different language, and possessing different political and social institutions, were yet descended from a branch of the same ethnic stock.

or of Institutions.

But whatever be the proportion in which the various national elements have coalesced, it is certain that the principles of our Constitution are in no wise derived from either Celt or Roman. The

1 This hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the few words in our language which have been retained from the original Celtic (about thirty-two in number, excluding proper names) have all relation to inferior employments, and for the most part apply exclusively to articles of feminine use or to the domestic occupations of women. (See a list of these words, made by the late Mr. Garnett, in Transactions of the Philological Society, vol. i., p. 171.) On the other hand, the tribal or family organisation of the Germans and the peculiar honour given to wonien among them, point to the strong improbability of any general amalgamation through intermarriage. The Britons also were long adverse to such an admixture. See Stubbs, Const. Hist. i. 62.

* Stubbs, Select Charters, Introductory Sketch, p. 3. See also Archdeacon Squire, Anglo-Saxon Government in Germany and England (1745); Freeman, Norm. Conq. vol. i.; and Stubbs, Const. Hist. vol. i. The arguments in favour of the opposite theory, of the permanence of the British race, are very ably stated by Mr. L. O. Pike in his Origin of the English. Mr. Coote, in his Romans of Britain (1878), also maintains the permanence of the population of Britain, but then he affirms that the greater part of the island was occupied by a Belgic race, who began to settle here before the invasion of Julius Caesar, and that these Belgians were Teutonic.

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »