United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Հատոր 399United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1971 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Հատոր 320 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1944 |
Common terms and phrases
392 Opinion 41 Cong accused alibi amicus curiae appellee arrest of judgment assets Attorney Bank bankruptcy bondholders bonds C. A. 9th Cir California Certiorari denied Code Ann Commission Commission's common-law conclusion concurring Confrontation Clause conscientious objector Const constitutional conviction counsel Court of Appeals Crim cross-examination decision defendant dismissed dissenting 399 U.S. District Court evidence fact federal forma pauperis Fourteenth Amendment granted Haven hearsay imprisonment indictment Interstate Commerce Act issue jeopardy judge June 29 jurisdiction jury trial JUSTICE BLACKMUN liquidation ment merger Misc motion in arrest motion in bar offense Opinion of HARLAN Penn Central petition petitioner Phillipsburg preliminary hearing pretrial prior prosecution question railroad remanded reorganization court Reported rule Senator sentence Sisson Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute Supp supra testimony three-judge court tion trial by jury trustees United witness writ writ of certiorari York
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 232 - An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State, or that there is either an absence of available State corrective process or the existence of circumstances rendering such process ineffect've to protect the rights of the prisoner.
Էջ 50 - Government, as recognizing a necessary difference between a search of a store, dwelling house, or other structure in respect of which a proper official warrant readily may be obtained and a search of a ship, motor boat, wagon, or automobile for contraband goods where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.
Էջ 19 - That in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to have the assistance of counsel for his defense...
Էջ 389 - Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts sought to be restrained; and is binding only upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal...
Էջ 7 - Left without the aid of counsel he may be put on trial without a proper charge, and convicted upon incompetent evidence, or evidence irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. He lacks both the skill and knowledge adequately to prepare his defense, even though he have a perfect one. He requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings against him.
Էջ 120 - Frankfurter & Corcoran, Petty Federal Offenses and the Constitutional Guaranty of Trial by Jury, 39 Harv.
Էջ 326 - Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp, 397 US 150 (1970) ; Barlow v. Collins, 397 US 159 (1970).
Էջ 181 - The Legislature shall have power to provide for the taking, in the presence of the party accused and his counsel, of depositions of witnesses, in criminal cases other than cases of homicide, when there is reason to believe that the witness, from inability or other cause, will not attend at the trial.
Էջ 67 - MARSHALL announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which the CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR.
Էջ 121 - We might go still further and say, with undoubted truth, that there is nothing in the constitution to prevent any state from adopting any system of laws or judicature it sees fit for all or any part of its territory.