...between the states, and would exclude state control over many contracts purely domestic In their nature. The business of insurance Is not commerce. The contract...perils of the sea." The state of California has the power to exclude foreign Insurance companies altogether from her territory, whether they were formed...

...between the States ; and would exclude state control over many contracts purely domestic in their nature. The business of insurance is not commerce. The contract...perils of the sea." The State of California has the power to exclude foreign insurance companies altogether from her territory, whether they were formed...

...simple contract of Indemnity against loss by fire. See Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 108, 19 L. Ed. 357. The making of such a contract is a mere incident of commercial intercourse. See New York bife Ins. Co. v. Cravens, 178 US 389, 20 Sup. Ct. 962, 44 L. Ed. 1116. And the situs of...

...consideration." In Hooper v. California, 155 US 648, 655, 15 Sup. Ct 207, 210, 39 L. Ed. 297, the court said: "The business of Insurance is not commerce....fire and insurance against 'the perils of the sea.' " In New York Life Ins. Co. v. Cravens, 178 US 389, 20 Sup. Ct. 962, 44 L. Ed. 1116, it was held that:...

...interstate commerce." We omit the reasoning by which that is demonstrated, and will only repeat, " The business of insurance is not commerce. The contract...fire and insurance against the ' perils of the sea.' " And we add, or against the uncertainty of man's mortality. Judgment affirmed. VOL. ctxxviii — 26...

...the slates; and •would exclude state control over many contracts purely domestic in their nature. The business of insurance is not commerce. The contract...instrumentality of commerce. The making of such a -contract ia a mere incident of commercial intercourse, aod in this respect there is op differ•ence whatever...

...to points and places wholly within the state. The cases to this effect are numerous." Page 59. * * * The business of insurance is not commerce. The contract...perils of the sea." The state of California has the power to exclude foreign insurance companies altogether from her territory, whether they were formed...

...between the States ; and would exclude state control over many contracts purely domestic in their nature. The business of insurance is not commerce. The contract...is no difference whatever between insurance against lire and insurance against ' the perils of the sea.' " Or, as remarked in New York Life Insurance Company...

...control over many contracta purely domestic in their nature. The business of insurance is not commerce. A contract of insurance is not an instrumentality of...this respect there is no difference whatever between ineurance against fire and insurance against 'the perils of the sea.' " Or, as remarked in Jfcw York...

...Justice White, now on the Supreme Bench, in rendering the opinion in the case of Hooper r. California, said: The business of insurance is not commerce. The...of insurance is not an instrumentality of commerce. Tho making of such a contract is a mere incident <>f commercial Intercourse, anil in this respect there...