Atlantic Reporter, Հատոր 81 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 99–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 13
M UN I C I PAL CoRPORATIONs ($ 821*)– STREETS – INJURIES –
NEGLIGENCE—JURY QUESTION. In an action against a city and sewer
contractors for injuries by falling over a manhole frame temporarily placed by the
contractors on a ...
M UN I C I PAL CoRPORATIONs ($ 821*)– STREETS – INJURIES –
NEGLIGENCE—JURY QUESTION. In an action against a city and sewer
contractors for injuries by falling over a manhole frame temporarily placed by the
contractors on a ...
Էջ 14
the obstruction each night until it was removed, as bearing on the question of
negligence. [Ed. Note.—For other cases., see Municipal #". Cent. Dig. $ 1732;
Dec. Dig. § 14. TRIAL ($ 62*)—EVIDENCE—REBUTTAL EVIDENCE. Evidence is
...
the obstruction each night until it was removed, as bearing on the question of
negligence. [Ed. Note.—For other cases., see Municipal #". Cent. Dig. $ 1732;
Dec. Dig. § 14. TRIAL ($ 62*)—EVIDENCE—REBUTTAL EVIDENCE. Evidence is
...
Էջ 15
If the only negligence charged in this case related to the maintenance of a light
on the manhole frame during the hours of darkneSS, We might accept as sound
and just the principle which the prayer under consideration invoked. The difficulty
...
If the only negligence charged in this case related to the maintenance of a light
on the manhole frame during the hours of darkneSS, We might accept as sound
and just the principle which the prayer under consideration invoked. The difficulty
...
Էջ 16
The question of negligence in the deposit in an unsuitable place and in an
improper position on a public thoroughfare of materials designed for Subsequent
use at anOther point was not involved. The second prayer of the same
defendants ...
The question of negligence in the deposit in an unsuitable place and in an
improper position on a public thoroughfare of materials designed for Subsequent
use at anOther point was not involved. The second prayer of the same
defendants ...
Էջ 17
She had the right to assume that the sidewalk was safe for pedestrians, and we
would not be justified in declaring her guilty of contributory negligence merely
because she did not observe in the obscurity to which she testified the low dark ...
She had the right to assume that the sidewalk was safe for pedestrians, and we
would not be justified in declaring her guilty of contributory negligence merely
because she did not observe in the obscurity to which she testified the low dark ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent agreed agreement alleged amended amount answer appeal appellee applied Argued assignment authority bank bill cause Cent charge claim common Company Constitution construction contract corporation costs County court damages decree deed defendant determine directed duty effect election entered entitled error evidence exceptions execution existing fact filed further give given granted ground held hold injury intended interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury land limited matter ment mortgage negligence Note.—For notice objection opinion owner paid parties passed payment person plaintiff plea present proceedings proper purchase question railroad reason received record recover referred rule shares statute street sufficient suit Supreme Court taken testimony tion trial trust verdict witness writ