Fur Seal Arbitration: In the Matter of the Claims of Great Britain Against the United States of America Before the Bering Sea Claims Commission. Argument for the United States in ReplyU.S. Government Printing Office, 1897 - 496 էջ |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 4
... appears from the testimony of witnesses on this record that the mail facilities between Alaska and the railway mail connections on the Pacific Coast with Washington were not only very irregular , but that the time was from ten days to ...
... appears from the testimony of witnesses on this record that the mail facilities between Alaska and the railway mail connections on the Pacific Coast with Washington were not only very irregular , but that the time was from ten days to ...
Էջ 6
... manner for presentation to the United States , and never pre- sented them . On the contrary on April 18 , 1888 , as appears by the record , Her Majesty's ambassador formally communi- cated to Mr. 6 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT .
... manner for presentation to the United States , and never pre- sented them . On the contrary on April 18 , 1888 , as appears by the record , Her Majesty's ambassador formally communi- cated to Mr. 6 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT .
Էջ 7
... appears to them difficult without investigation and verification ; and they therefore wish to ascertain whether the United States Government would be disposed to agree to a mixed commission , etc. The claims were not presented in any ...
... appears to them difficult without investigation and verification ; and they therefore wish to ascertain whether the United States Government would be disposed to agree to a mixed commission , etc. The claims were not presented in any ...
Էջ 9
... appears this statement : ( 4 ) Until the year 1886 the United States Government by no positive act sought to exercise any exclusive jurisdiction over the waters of Bering Sea beyond the usual territorial limit ; nor did they by any ...
... appears this statement : ( 4 ) Until the year 1886 the United States Government by no positive act sought to exercise any exclusive jurisdiction over the waters of Bering Sea beyond the usual territorial limit ; nor did they by any ...
Էջ 10
... appears by this record , on the evidence put in by Her Majesty's Government , that the first ship to engage in pelagic sealing was an American vessel that went into the sea in 1884. It was not claimed before the Paris Tribunal that any ...
... appears by this record , on the evidence put in by Her Majesty's Government , that the first ship to engage in pelagic sealing was an American vessel that went into the sea in 1884. It was not claimed before the Paris Tribunal that any ...
Բովանդակություն
1 | |
12 | |
18 | |
19 | |
40 | |
148 | |
155 | |
177 | |
375 | |
382 | |
388 | |
395 | |
402 | |
408 | |
414 | |
423 | |
209 | |
228 | |
247 | |
258 | |
265 | |
319 | |
337 | |
357 | |
364 | |
437 | |
447 | |
457 | |
466 | |
477 | |
484 | |
490 | |
497 | |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
25th of August affidavit Alexander Frank Alexander McLean Alfred Adams allegiance amount Anna Beck appears Argument on behalf award Bechtel Bering Sea bill of sale Black Diamond boat Britain British argument British subject canoes Captain Warren Carolena catch Charles Spring cited claim claimants Commissioners Convention cost court crew cross-examination damages Daniel McLean Dolphin domicile evidence examination fact Government High Commission hunters hunting Indians international law Jacob Gutman July jurisdiction line 50 loss Majesty's Majesty's Government Mary Ellen master Morris Moss nation owner Pathfinder port Pribilof Pribilof Islands question reason Record referred registered Richard Rush rule San Francisco schedule schooner seal hunting seal skins sealing grounds sealing season sealing vessels seized seizure September ship Sitka sold statement testified testimony Thornton tion tons treaty Treaty of Washington Unalaska Victoria voyage W. P. Sayward weather William Munsie witness
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 51 - The inhabitants of the two countries, respectively, shall have liberty freely and securely to come with their ships and cargoes to all such places, ports, and rivers, in the territories aforesaid, to which other foreigners are permitted to come...
Էջ 23 - When parties have deliberately put their engagements into writing in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking, was reduced to writing...
Էջ 168 - Alabama claims. And whereas Her Britannic Majesty has authorized her High Commissioners and Plenipotentiaries to express in a friendly spirit the regret felt by Her Majesty's Government for the escape, under whatever circumstances, of the Alabama and other vessels from British ports, and for the depredations committed by those vessels.
Էջ 28 - The high contracting parties agree that all claims on the part of corporations, companies, or private individuals, citizens of the United States...
Էջ 31 - The commissioners, so named, shall meet at London at the earliest convenient period after they shall have been respectively named; and shall, before proceeding to any business, make and subscribe a solemn declaration that they will impartially and carefully examine and decide, to the best of their judgment, and according to justice and equity...
Էջ 94 - ... satisfactory provision for the future, agrees, that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules. And the High Contracting Parties agree to observe these rules as between themselves in future, and to bring them to the knowledge of other maritime Powers, and to invite them to accede to them.
Էջ 167 - Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
Էջ 28 - Companies, or private individuals, subjects of Her Britannic Majesty, upon the Government of the United States, arising out of acts committed against the persons or property of subjects of Her Britannic Majesty...
Էջ 100 - And whereas the Government of Her Britannic Majesty cannot justify itself for a failure in due diligence on the plea of the insufficiency of the legal means of action which it possessed: Four of the Arbitrators for the reasons above assigned, and the fifth for reasons separately assigned by him, Are of opinion — That Great Britain has in this case failed, by omission, to fulfil the duties prescribed in the first and the third of the Rules established by the Vlth Article of the Treaty of Washington....
Էջ 167 - Her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees, that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules.