« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »
The rest were slain in Chevy-Chase,
Under the greenwood tree.
Their husbands to bewail;
But all would not prevail.
They bare with them away:
Ere they were clad in clay.
God save our king, and bless this land
With plenty, joy, and peace;
'Twixt noblemen may cease
THE TWO CORBILS.
There were two corbies sat on a tree
I One of the most poetical and picturesque ballads existing. The neck-bone- a phrase for the neck.
O, cauld and bare will his bed be,
QUEEN ELIZABETH. 1533—1603. Taz pretensions of Queen Elizabeth to poetic genius are about as valid as her pretensions to beauty; yet she loved to be flattered for both, as much as for ber classical attainments, which she really possessed. The desire of shining as a poetess was one of her weaknesses; and her vanity, no doubt, made her regard as tributes justly paid, the 'extravagant praises which the courtiers and writers of her age lavished on her royal ditties.
We have but very little of her poetry: the best piece, perhaps, is one which shows that, notwithstanding her maidenly statelinėss and prudery, she was not altogether a stranger to the nder passion.
VERSES ON HER OWN FEELINGS.?
1 It would of course be impossible here to give a mere outline of Elzabeth's life, so full of import ant events. Any good history of England may be read for the requisite information. Of the smaller Histories, Keightley's is the best. Read, also, a well-written life in Mrs. Strickland's Lives of the Queens of England." In Dr. Drake's "Shakspeare and his Times," will be found sonse interesting particulars of her attainments, domestic habits, love of dress, vanity, jealousy, and her fondness for the drama and the brutal show of bear-baiting, &c. &c.
: These verses first appeared in print in “ Headley's Anc. Eng. Poet." They were transcribed from a manuscript in the Ashmolean Museum. Unfortunately, the most important word is half obbterated-upon Moun— departure;" but the following account from the old chronicler Slow shows pretty conclusively that it refers to the Duke of Alencon. "These Lords (the Ambassadors from France,) after divers secret conferences amongst themselves, and return of sundry letters into France, signifying the queen's declination from marriage, and the people's unwillingness to inate' that way, beld it most convenient that the duke should come in proper person, whose presence they thought in such afairs might prevail more than all their oratory: and, thereupon, the first of November, the said prince came over in person, very princely accompanied and attended, though not to such glorious manner as were the above-named commissioners, whose entertainment, in all resects, was equivalent unto his estate and dignity. By this time his picture, state, and titles were advanced in every stationer's shop, and many other public places, by the name of Frauncis of Vaolis, Debe of Akznson, heir apparent of France, and brother to the French king: but he was better knowo by the name of Monsicur, unto all sorts of people, than by all his other titles. During his abode in England, he used all princely means to prefer his suit, and in his carriage demeaned himself like a true born prince, and the heir of France: and when he had well observed the queen's full determi nation to continue a single life, he pacified himself, admiring her rare virtues and high perfections The queen in all respects showed as great kindness unto the duke and all his retinue, at their de parture, as at any ume before, and for period of her princely favors, in that behall, she, with great cate, accompanied the duke in person to Canterbury; where she feasted him and all his train very royally, and then returned. The next day, being the sixth of February, the duke, with his French lords and others, embarked at Sandwich."
** As dead qucens rank but with meaner inortals, we may assert, without much fear of contradio tion, ibat little else can now be gratified by the perusal of Elizabeth's poetry thau mere curiosity."
I do, yet dare not say I ever meant,
I am, and not, I freeze, and yet am burnd,
Since from myself my other self I turn'd.
No means I find to rid him from my breast,
Till by the end of things it be suppress’d.
Or let me live with some more sweet content,
Signed, “ Finis, Eliza. Regina, upon
TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE." No literary undertaking in any age of English Literature has proved to be as important in its results, as the Translation of the Bible under the direction of King James I. Of the labors of Wiclif in translating the Bible from the Latin Vulgate, and of the successful exertions of Tyndale, in face of every danger and even of death, in giving to his countrymen a version of the New Testament in their vernacular tongue, short accounts are given under the lives of those scholars, together with specimens of their respective translations. Subsequently, very many versions appeared, of which the following are the most important :
1. COVERDALE'S BIBLE. This was printed in Zurich, in 1535, because the translator, Miles Coverdale, a native of Yorkshire, was obliged to fly from his native land. To liim, therefore, must be awarded the nonor of being the first to give the whole Bible in English, translated out of the original tongues It was printed in double columns, folio.
2. MATTHEWE: BIBLE. This appeared in 1537. But the name, Thomas Matthewe, which appeared in the title-page, and from which it has received its name, was undoubtedly fictitious, and the real editor was John Rogers, who was burned at the stake in the reign of Mary.
1 In mentioning the several causes that made the Age of Elizabeth so distinguished for its great names in literature, Hazlitt, in his “Literature of the Age of Elizabeth," thus writes :- " The translation of the Bible was the chief engine in the great work. It threw open, by a secret spring, the rich treasures of religion and morality which had been there locked up as in a shrine. It revealed the visions of the prophets, and conveyed the lessons of inspired teachers to the meanest of the people. It gave them a common interest in a common cause. Their hearts burnt within them as they read. It gave a mind to the people, by giving them common subjects of thought and feeling. it cemented their union of character and sentiment; it created endless diversity and collision of opinion. They found objects to employ their faculties, and a motive in the magnitude of the conse quences attached to them, to evert the utmost engerr ess in the pursut of truth, and the most daring intrepidity in maintaining it."
" It was
3. CRANMER'S, or The GREAT BIBLE, in iarge folio. This appeared in 1539. The preface was written by Cranmer, then archbishop of Canterbury, but the translation or division was by many hands, the chief of whom was Coverdale.
4. TAVERNER'S BIBLE. This appeared in 1539, edited by Richard Taverner, the text being formed on Matthewe's Bible.
In May, 1541, Henry VIII. issued a decree that the great volume of the Bible should be set up in every parish church in England, and all curates, not already furnished, were commanded to procure Bibles, and place them conveniently in their respective churches, and all the bishops were required to tale especial care to see the said command put in force. wonderful," says the old historian John Strype, “ to see with what joy thus book of God was received, not only among the learneder sort, but generally all England over, among all the people; and with what greeiliness Gai's word was read, and what resort to places where the reading of it was.”
During the reign of Edward VI. (1547—1553) eleven impressions of tho English Bible were published, but they were merely reprints of one or other of the editions mentioned above.
3. The Geneva BIBLE. This was translated, with notes, by Miles Cover. dale and others, who during the reign of Mary fled to Geneva. On the acession of Elizabeth, 1558, some returned, and others remained 10 finish the work, which appeared in 1560. This long continued to be the favorito Bible of the English Puritans and of the Scotch Presbyterians. Fifty im. pressions of it, at least, are known.
6. The Bishop's Bible, which appeared in 1568, so called from Matthew Parker, archbishop of Canterbury, who employed others to prepare it.
7. Trx Douar BIBLE, of which the New Testament was printed at Rheims' in 1582, and the Old at Douay2 in 1609—10.
8. King James's BIBLE. We are now brought to our own translation. At the accession of James I., 1603, many complaints were made of the discrepancies then existing among the several versions of the Bible. At the great conference held in 1604, at Hampton Court, between the Established and Puritan clergy, all parties agreeing in their disapprobation of the version of the Scriptures then most generally used, the king commissioned fifty-four men, the most learned in the universities and other places, to coinmence a new translation. At the same time he required the bishops to inform themBelves of all the learneol men within their several dioceses, who had acquired especial skill in the Greek and Hebrew languages, and who had taken great pains in their private studies to investigate obscure passages and to correct mistakes in former English translations, and to charge them to communicato their observations to the persons thus employed to translate the whole Scrip tures.
Before the work was begun, seven of the persons nominated for it were either dead or declined to engage in the task; the remaining forty-seven were classed under six divisions, a certain portion of Scripture being assigned to each. They proceeded to their task at Oxford, Cambridge, and Westiaiir ster, each indi vidual translating the portion assigned to his division, and when all in any one division had finished, they met together, compared theis several translations, and decided all differences, and settled upon what they
1 about so roules N. E. of Paris.
% About 100 miles N. of Paris.
deemed the best translation. When the several divisions had finished, they all met together, and one and another by turns read the new version, while all the rest held in their hands either copies of the original or some valuable version. If any one objected to the translation of any passage, the reader stopped to allow time for discussion, comparison, and final decision.
The labor appears to have commenced in the spring of 1604, and the result was published in 1611, under the following title, “ The Holy Bible, conteyning the Old Testament and the New, newly translated out of the Originall Tongues, and with the former Translations diligently compared and revised by his Majesties speciall Commandement." As a translation, this is generally most faithful, and an excellent specimen of the language of the time. Dr. Adam Clarke remarks, “The translators have seized the very spirit and soul of the original, and expressed this, almost everywhere, with pathos and energy they have not only made a standard translation, but have made this translation the standard of our language.” This is eminently true, for in all human probability this translation will never be changed.
Still, strict truth and justice require us to say that there are some defects and eriors, in our present version, which a more advanced state of biblical science enables us to detect. The translators had not access to the various sources of biblical criticism and elucidation which we enjoy at the present day; such as the collation of ancient manuscripts and versions; the multiplication of grammars and lexicons; the enlarged comparison of kindred dialects; and the researches of travellers into the geography, manners, customs, and natural history of the East.' But after all, instead of dwelling upon errors and discrepancies, which are really unimportant, we must ever wonder that there are so few, and admire the fidelity, the learning, and the wisdom of the great and good men that executed the work.?
I have felt it a duty, in entering upon thie reign of James I., when the present version of our Bible was made, to give this short historical view of the sacred volume, because, to say not::ing of its divine origin, nothing of its inspired contents, nothing of its being the foundation of all morality, the groundwork of our religion, and our unerring rule of faith and practice, it lias done so much for English mind, English literature, and English character. To say nothing of its heavenly influences, wherever faithfully and honestly fol lowed, in elevating and blessing man, and in removing every wicked practice
1 For some very able remarks on our present version, see Professor Bush's Introduction to his Notes on Genesis."
2 One of the greatest defects in our translation is a want of uniformity in rendering, both in regard lo single words and to phrases. To give a few instances of what I mean. The Greek adverb evous It uthus), which nieans “ directly," "immediately," is translated in Matt. ii. 16, by " straightway;" xil. 20, by “anon;" xii. 21, by "by and by;" Mark i. 12, by "inmediately;" John xix, 34, b. " forthwith." In all these places, "immediately” would have better expressed the original: ** by and by" is peculiarly infelicitous. So the verb pe piu våte (meriannate) in Matt. vi. 25, is rendere "take no thought;" In Phil. tv. 6, “be careful." The latter comes nearer the true meaning, which 18, "be not distracted about," "be not over anxious about." In justice, however, to the translators, I would say that in King James's day, the phrase "take no thought" had a much stronger meaning than it now has, being nearly equivalent to "let not your thoughts be unduly exercised." In many other casalso, the present translation fails to express the sense, owing to changes which our lan guage has undergone. One more instance will suffice. David says, (Psalm cxix. 147,1 ") prevented the dawning of the morning," where "prevent" is used in its original Latin sense of "going before." "anticipating," and in King James's day it was so understood. Now, we know, it is used in tho sense of to "hinder." This, though & most interesting subject of inquiry, cannot appropriately be pursued any further bere