Federal Acknowledgment Process: Hearing Before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, Second Session, on Oversight of the Federal Acknowledgment Process and the Federal Acknowledgment Project of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, June 2, 1980, Washington, D.C.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980 - 102 էջ |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 23–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 1
... facts indicate that Congress needs to take a careful look at the process and ascertain the reasons it is not working in a more timely fashion . The purpose of this hearing is to do just that . In addition to information regarding the ...
... facts indicate that Congress needs to take a careful look at the process and ascertain the reasons it is not working in a more timely fashion . The purpose of this hearing is to do just that . In addition to information regarding the ...
Էջ 2
... fact . That is , after the Federal regulations were interpreted and we felt good that we had gone and visited all these people , we got home and felt a sense of guilt that after the trips , we left many communities out there trying to ...
... fact . That is , after the Federal regulations were interpreted and we felt good that we had gone and visited all these people , we got home and felt a sense of guilt that after the trips , we left many communities out there trying to ...
Էջ 3
... fact that on Octo- ber 1 , 1978 , when the present regulations became final , the Federal Government entered into a quasi - trust relationship with all nonfeder- ally recognized Indian people until a final determination is made re ...
... fact that on Octo- ber 1 , 1978 , when the present regulations became final , the Federal Government entered into a quasi - trust relationship with all nonfeder- ally recognized Indian people until a final determination is made re ...
Էջ 8
... fact remains that providing tech- nical assistance without any limitations creates the potential for an unrealistic workload on the FAP staff . It appears the Bureau may have further difficulties because of the controver- sial nature ...
... fact remains that providing tech- nical assistance without any limitations creates the potential for an unrealistic workload on the FAP staff . It appears the Bureau may have further difficulties because of the controver- sial nature ...
Էջ 10
... fact that the tradi- tional Kickapoo Tribe of Texas is not federally recognized by the Bu- reau of Indian Affairs . I have also included pictures of the Kickapoo Indian Tribe , as well as their houses in Eagle Pass , Tex . These ...
... fact that the tradi- tional Kickapoo Tribe of Texas is not federally recognized by the Bu- reau of Indian Affairs . I have also included pictures of the Kickapoo Indian Tribe , as well as their houses in Eagle Pass , Tex . These ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
aboriginal Indian title Act of March active consideration Administration for Native American Rights Fund application attorney Band budget Bureau of Indian California Chairman Cherokee claim Congress decision Department Development documented petition Duwamish Eagle Pass efforts extinguished Federal Acknowledgment Project Federal agencies Federal Government Federal recognition Georgia Health Indian Affairs Indian groups Indian Reorganization Act JOHN MELCHER Kickapoo Indians Lumbee Mashpee ment Mexican Cession Michigan Narragansett Tribe Native American Native American Rights nonfederally recognized Indian North Carolina P.O. Box petition for Federal Petitioners petitioning groups present problems proposed findings public domain Question recognized tribes regulations reservations right of occupancy Samish Tribe Senator MELCHER Snohomish Tribe Snoqualmie Steilacoom Stillaguamish Tribe submitted Supreme Court technical assistance testimony Traditional Kickapoo Tribe training and technical treaty fishing rights treaty rights Tribal Council tribal groups Tribe of Indians Tribes in California Tsimshian Tribal Council Tunica-Biloxi Wampanoag Western Washington
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 93 - While the different nations of Europe respected the right of the natives, as occupants, they asserted the ultimate dominion to be in themselves ; and claimed and exercised, as a consequence of this ultimate dominion, a power to grant the soil, while yet in possession of the natives. These grants have been understood by all to convey a title to the grantees, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy.
Էջ 88 - That no purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the constitution.
Էջ 87 - Indian tribe, is not, without the consent of said tribe, to be included within the territorial limits or jurisdiction of any State or Territory; but all such territory shall be excepted out of...
Էջ 17 - As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed.
Էջ 93 - The majority of the court is of opinion that the nature of the Indian title, which is certainly to be respected by all courts, until it be legitimately extinguished, is not such as to be absolutely repugnant to seisin in fee on the part of the State.
Էջ 80 - This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession.
Էջ 89 - That for the purpose of ascertaining and settling private land claims in the State of California, a commission shall be, and is hereby, constituted, which shall consist of three...
Էջ 81 - In the establishment of these relations, the rights of the original inhabitants were in no instance entirely disregarded, but were necessarily to a considerable extent impaired, They were admitted to be the rightful occupants of the soil, with a legal as well as just claim to retain possession of it, and to use it according to their own discretion...
Էջ 81 - The exclusion of all other Europeans necessarily gave to the nation making the discovery the sole right of acquiring the soil from the natives and establishing settlements upon it. It was a right with which no Europeans could interfere. It was a right which all asserted for themselves, and to the assertion of which by others all assented.
Էջ 92 - That each and every person claiming lands in California by virtue of any right or title derived from the Spanish or Mexican government...