. . .a finding is 'clearly erroneous ' when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co..... Timber Industry Practices in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska: Oversight ... - Էջ 230United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Mining, Forest Management, and Bonneville Power Administration - 1983 - 410 էջԱմբողջությամբ դիտվող - Այս գրքի մասին
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1955 - 862 էջ
...Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. New York Central R. Co., 126 F. 2d 992, 994-995 (CA 2d Cir.). A finding is clearly erroneous when "although there...that a mistake has been committed," United States v. Oregon Medical Society, 343 US 326, 339; United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 364, 395.... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1962 - 1000 էջ
...Cir. 1958). Under this rule an appellate court cannot upset a trial court's factual findings unless it "is left with the definite and firm conviction that...committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 364, 395 (1948). A refusal to credit the uncorroborated testimony of the director-partner, who... | |
| United States. Food and Drug Administration - 1959 - 1068 էջ
...all accepted scientific knowledge" and, therefore, not substantial. "On the entire evidence we are left 'with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.' United States \. US Oyptum Co., 333 US 364, 395. The overwhelming weight of the evidence requires a conclusion that... | |
| United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1976 - 1036 էջ
...to the discharges of employees Brian Brack and Harold Straub. 547 F.2d 575 (CADC) judge credibility, "is left with the definite and firm conviction that...committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 542, 95 L.Ed. 746 (1948); accord, eg, Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine... | |
| |