...814, 816. Thus in Bigelow this Court stated: "[I]n the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs." 327 US, at 264. "The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require that the wrongdoer...

...injury which is available in other contexts. The Court has repeatedly held that in the absence of more precise proof, the factfinder may 'conclude as a matter...values, not shown to be attributable to other causes, this position in ICC v. United States, 289 US 385, 390-391 (1933), a case involving rate discrimination...

...sustained verdicts for the plaintiffs, and that in the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs. In this we but followed a well-settled principle. See Hetzel v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 169 US 26,...

...sustained verdicts for the plaintiffs, and that in the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs. In this we but followed a well-settled principle. See Hetzel v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 169 US 26,...

...injury which is available in other contexts. The Court has repeatedly held that in the absence of more precise proof, the factfinder may "conclude as a matter...causes, that defendants' wrongful acts had caused damage 124 OCTOBER TERM, 1968. Opinion of the Court. 395 US to the plaintiffs." Bigelow v. RKO Pictures, Inc.,...

...injury which is available in other contexts. The Court has repeatedly held that in the absence of more precise proof, the factfinder may "conclude as a matter...reasonable inference from the proof of defendants' wrongful'acts and their tendency to injure plaintiffs' business, and from the evidence of the decline...

...stolen bonds. In that case this Court said: "[I]n the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...from the evidence of the decline in prices, profits 13 Opinion of BLACK, J. and values, not shown to be attributable to other causes, that defendants'...

...with the certainty of the value of stolen bonds. In that case this Court said: 13 Opinion of BLACK, J. and values, not shown to be attributable to other...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs." Id., at 264. "The most elementary conceptions of justice and public policy require that the wrongdoer...

...sustained verdicts for the plaintiffs, and that in the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs. In this we but followed a well-settled principle. See Hetzel v. Baltimore A Ohio R. Co., 169 US 26,...

...sustained verdicts for the plaintiffs, and that in the absence of more precise proof, the jury could conclude as a matter of just and reasonable inference...wrongful acts had caused damage to the plaintiffs. In this we but followed a well-settled principle. See Hftzel v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 169 US 26,...