...a judgment obtained against a defendant not actually personally notified. Rule 61. Harmless Error. No error in either the admission or the exclusion...defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside...

...new trial in the district courts is contained in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 61, which provides: "No error ... or defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside...

...admissible, you admit it. And then rule 61, under the heading of ''Harmless Error" provides that— No error in either the admission or the exclusion...defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside...

...a judgment obtained against a defendant not actually personally notified. Rule 61. Harmless Error. No error in either the admission or the exclusion...defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside...

...admissible, y mi admit it. And then rule 61, under the heading of "Harndes.- Error*' provides that— Mo error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence and no error « defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or • auy of the parties...

...review on a disputed issue of law is whether the initial decision is erroneous. § 17.48 Harmless error. No error in either the admission or the exclusion...and no error or defect in any ruling or order or in any act done or omitted by the presiding officer or by any of the parties is grounds for vacating,...

...review on a disputed issue of law is whether the initial decision is erroneous. § 17.48 Harmless error. No error in either the admission or the exclusion...and no error or defect in any ruling or order or in any act done or omitted by the presiding officer or by any of the parties is grounds for vacating,...

...review on a disputed issue of law is whether the Initial decision is erroneous. § 17.48 Harmless error. No error in either the admission or the exclusion...and no error or defect In any ruling or order or In any act done or omitted by the presiding officer or by any of the parties is grounds for vacating,...

...whether the initial decision is oneous. 7.48 Harmless error. Jo error in either the admission or • exclusion of evidence, and no error or defect in any ruling or order or in any act done or omitted by the presiding officer or by any of the parties is grounds for vacating,...

...F. Supp. 868, 870; 99 F. Supp. 7 The applicable Rule 61 of the Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. is as follows: "No error in either the admission or the exclusion...defect in any ruling or order or in anything done or omitted by the court or by any of the parties is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside...