United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1999 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 43
... clear - statement rule " that forbids pre - emption “ unless a federal statute specifically requires otherwise . " 508 U. S. , at 507. Florida believes that this statement in Fabe means that the Federal Statute would have to use the ...
... clear - statement rule " that forbids pre - emption “ unless a federal statute specifically requires otherwise . " 508 U. S. , at 507. Florida believes that this statement in Fabe means that the Federal Statute would have to use the ...
Էջ 44
... clear " statement of its intent to abrogate . Pp . 54-57 . ( b ) The inquiry into whether Congress has the power to abrogate unilaterally the States ' immunity from suit is narrowly focused on a single question : Was the Act in question ...
... clear " statement of its intent to abrogate . Pp . 54-57 . ( b ) The inquiry into whether Congress has the power to abrogate unilaterally the States ' immunity from suit is narrowly focused on a single question : Was the Act in question ...
Էջ 56
... clear in the language of the statute . " Id . , at 227-228 . See also Welch v . Texas Dept. of Highways and Public Transp . , 483 U. S. 468 , 474 ( 1987 ) ( plurality opinion ) . Here , we agree with the parties , with the Eleventh ...
... clear in the language of the statute . " Id . , at 227-228 . See also Welch v . Texas Dept. of Highways and Public Transp . , 483 U. S. 468 , 474 ( 1987 ) ( plurality opinion ) . Here , we agree with the parties , with the Eleventh ...
Էջ 57
... clear that the State is the defendant to the suit brought by an Indian tribe under § 2710 ( d ) ( 7 ) ( A ) ( i ) . In sum , we think that the numerous references to the " State " in the text of § 2710 ( d ) ( 7 ) ( B ) make it ...
... clear that the State is the defendant to the suit brought by an Indian tribe under § 2710 ( d ) ( 7 ) ( A ) ( i ) . In sum , we think that the numerous references to the " State " in the text of § 2710 ( d ) ( 7 ) ( B ) make it ...
Էջ 58
... clear that the relief sought by a plaintiff suing a State is irrelevant to the question whether the suit is barred by the Eleventh Amendment . See , e . g . , Cory v . White , 457 U. S. 85 , 90 ( 1982 ) ( " It would be a novel ...
... clear that the relief sought by a plaintiff suing a State is irrelevant to the question whether the suit is barred by the Eleventh Amendment . See , e . g . , Cory v . White , 457 U. S. 85 , 90 ( 1982 ) ( " It would be a novel ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Հատոր 320 United States. Supreme Court Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1944 |
Common terms and phrases
action Alabama Alabama Supreme Court amici curiae apply argued the cause Attorney authority award Bank BREYER Brief certiorari Circuit claim Commerce common law concluded conduct Cong Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant delegation dismiss dissenting District Court doctrine election Eleventh Amendment enacted enforcement ERISA Ex parte Young Export Clause federal court Federal Rule federal-question filed Government granted Holly Farms Ibid imposed issue judge judgment of acquittal judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE STEVENS legislative lesser included offense limited ment motion National Office of Personnel Opinion of STEVENS Personnel Management petitioner political parties preclearance principles Procedure prohibition protection provides punitive damages question reason regulation remand requirement respondents SCALIA sentence SOUTER sovereign immunity Stat State's statute statutory sua sponte suit supra Supreme Court tion trial Twenty-first Amendment United violation Virginia voting Voting Rights Act