Page images

the glory of God the Father. We are filled with the fruits of righteousness, which are by Jesus Christ to the glory and praise of God.” Phil. i. 11. And that “God had exalted him, who being in the form God took upon him the form of a servant, and given him a name above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, and every tongue should confess, that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." Chap. ii. 9, 10, 11.

And, surely, he who is Lord to the glory of God the Father, “ who works in us the fruits of righteousness, to the glory of God the Father," must be inferior to him, whose glory is the end, both of his exaltation to be Lord, and of that righteousness he worketh in us. So when St Peter saith, “ If a man minister, let him do it, as of the ability which God giveth, that God in all things may be glorified, through Jesus Christ.”

For seeing actions flow from the essences of them, whose actions they are ; where the singular essence is one and the same, the action must be one and the same; and when an action is done by one to this end, that another may be glorified, he, to whose glory it is done, must be superior to him, for whose glory it is done ; the end being still more noble than the means by which it is accomplished.

FOURTHLY, This still more visibly appears from that plain distinction, which is put between God the Father, and the Son, by way of gradation, as in these words, “ All are yours, for you are of Christ,

(or are Christ's] and Christ is of God.” Now we are Christ's, as being members of that body, of which he is the head; but yet with great inferiority to him. And, therefore, it seems reasonable to conceive, that these words, “Christ is of God," should signify, that he is inferior, and subordinate to him ; especially, if we add to them the like words in this Epistle, chap. xi. 3. “The head of the woman, is the man; the head of the man, is Christ ; the head of Christ, is God.” For the ground of these gradations, is plainly the superiority and dominion, which the one hath over the other.

FIFTHLY, This is evident from those places in which they are put in opposition; as in these words, “ This is life eternal, that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." John xvii. 3. And, “Ye have turned from idols to serve the living and true God; and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus which delivered us from the wrath to come.” 1 Thess. i. 9, 10. From which words it is evident, that God the Father must be in some more excellent sense, the only true God, the true and living God, than his Son Jesus Christ, whom he sent into the world.*

* Ecclesia Dei non predicat duos Deos, ου γαρ δύο αγέννητα, ουδε δύο άναρχα, αλλά μίαν άρχήν και Θεόν είναι, τον αυτόν Πατέρα διδάσκουσα είναι το μονογενους και αγαπητού υιού, μόνον αληθινόν Θεόν, μόνον σόφου, ó póvos 'lzesı åbævariæ, Quibus epithetis Deum Patrem a Deo Filio distinguit. Euseb. de Eccles. Theol. L. 2. c. 23. p. 141.


The same distinction, and opposition appeareth from these words, “ To the only wise God be glory, through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Rom. xvi. 27.

“ I command thee before God who quickeneth all things, that thou keep this commandment unspotted, till the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which in its proper season he shall shew, who is the only potentate, who only hath immortality.” 1 Tim. vi. 13, 14, 15, 16. Where the God, who quickeneth all things, is not only distinguished from our Lord Jesus Christ, but is styled the only potentate, who only hath immortality ; that is, by a description, which in some eminent sense must agree to him alone.

Sixthly, This may be argued from those epithets, which are peculiar to God the Father, and are never in Scripture applied to the Son. As,

1. That he is ofos üfertos, God most high, or the most high God. Gen. xiv. 18, 19, 20. So also he is called in the New Testament, Acts xvi. 17. Heb. vii. 1. Whereas the Son is only called vids toll istiotov, The Son of the most high. Mark v. 7. Luke i. 32. vi. 35. viii. 28. Acts xvi. 17.

2. The word Mavtorgétwg, 2 Cor. vi. 18, which signifies, omnipotens Deus, qui omnibus imperat, “ the omnipotent God who commands over all,” in Scripture is the epithet of God the Father only. He is also styled, “ The only true God.” John xvii. 3. “ The only good God.” Matth. xix. 17.

“The only wise God.” Rom. xvi. 27. “To God only wise, be glory, through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen." See also 1 Tim. i. 17. and Jude 25. All which epithets show, that these excellencies do most eminently, originally, and properly, belong to God the Father, and derivatively, and consequentially, to the Son, to whom they never are ascribed in the sacred writings.


Strange Consequences of the Doctrine, that the

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one and the same Being

In fine, this doctrine, that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are of one and the same individual and numerical essence, seems to burlesque the holy Scriptures, or to give them an uncouth and absurd sense, from the beginning of the Gospel, to the end of the Epistles.

To select some few instances of this nature.

First, When St Matthew saith, that, at the baptism of our Saviour, the “Holy Ghost descended upon him in the shape of a dove; and a voice was heard from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased ;" these words, according this doctrine, must signify, that the supreme God descended upon the supreme God, and the voice of the supreme God said from heaven, This is the supreme God in whom I, the same supreme God, am well pleased.

Secondly, When it is often said, “He that receiveth you, receiveth me; and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me.” ” Matth. X. 40. Luke x. 16. John xii. 20. the meaning of these words must be this ; He that receiveth you, receiveth the supreme God; and he that receiveth the supreme God, receiveth him that sent the supreme God. So that the supreme God must both send, and be sent by himself.

Thirdly, “ My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.” John. vii. 16. That is, according to this exposition ; My doctrine is not the doctrine of the supreme God, but it is the doctrine of the supreme God that sent me. And,

Fourthly, When it is said, “Whosoever receiveth me, receiveth not me, but him that sent me.” Mark ix. 37. and “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me.

." John xii. 44. the meaning must be this; He that receiveth the supreme God, receiveth not the supreme God, but the supreme God that sent him. And he that believeth on me the supreme God, believeth not on me the supreme God, but on the supreme God that sent me.

Fifthly, Our Lord saith, “Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that thou hearest

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »