XJH:8-2 THE CONGRESSIONAL JOURNALS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL STATE PAPERS OF THE UNITED STATES SERIES, The Journal of THOMAS JEFFERSON ADMINISTRATION 1801-1809 Volume 4 EIGHTH CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION NOVEMBER, 1804 MARCH, 1805 MICHAEL GLAZIER, INC. 1210 A King Street Every effort has been made to locate the best preserved and most Printed in the United States of America. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 4 NOTE: For the complete list of and biographical SAMUEL HARRISON SMITH Printer of the original edition Samuel Harrison Smith was born of prosperous parents in 1772 in Philadelphia. In 1787 he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. Smith was a man with deep cultural interests and he became secretary of the American Philosophical Society when Thomas Jefferson was its president. They became close friends. In 1796 Smith launched a pro-Jefferson newspaper, the New World which lasted less than a year. In 1797 he published his Remarks on Education, which cogently advocated free public schools. In September of the same year he purchased the Independent Gazetteer from the elder. Joseph Gales, and within a few months founded the Universal Gazette. At the urging of Thomas Jefferson, he and his brilliant young wife, Margaret Bayard Smith, moved to Washington in 1800, and he launched the Georgetown Centinal of Liberty on August 27. As there was no newspaper in Washington, Smith, encouraged by Jefferson, inaugurated the tri-weekly National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser. He claimed it was the first newspaper printed in Washington. He evidently overlooked the Imperial Observer of 1795. Nevertheless, it was the first important newspaper issued in the city. To supplement the National Intelligencer, he added a weekly edition of his Universal Gazette, which he had founded in Philadelphia three years before. These became the loud trumpets for the policies of his friend Jefferson, whose Manual of Parliamentary Practice he published in 1801. The great influence of the Smith papers was enhanced by the cool and judicious editorial policies. His publications never degenerated into vitriolic partisan organs. The National Intelligencer, which also reported the debates and affairs of Congress,was anathema to Federalists, but despite their dislike of its editorial policies, they had a personal respect for the publisher. His work on behalf of the government was amply rewarded by lucrative printing and stationery contracts. |