Antitrust Procedural Act of 1979, S. 390: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session, on S. 390, February 20 and 26, 1979
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - 256 էջ
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
abuse action activity addition agreement amendment American Antitrust Division antitrust laws antitrust litigation application Association attorneys authority award believe bill Civil Clayton Act client collateral estoppel commerce Commission committee complex concern conduct CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consider consideration corporations costs counsel court damages defendants delay demand Department dilatory discovery district documents effect enforcement engaged example existing expedite fact Federal filed firms give Government hearings important impose increasing intended involved issues Japanese Judge judgment judicial jurisdictional Justice lawyers legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited material matter ment mergers obtained party permit person plaintiff practices prejudgment interest present problem Procedural Professor proposed protective order question reach reason receivers recommendations requirement result rule sanctions Senator METZENBAUM Senator THURMOND SHENEFIELD statement subcommittee suggest tactics television tion Trade trial United violation
Էջ 180 - That no corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission shall acquire the whole or any part of the assets of another corporation engaged also in commerce, where in any line of commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly.
Էջ 194 - Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case as to increase costs unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally such excess costs.
Էջ 232 - Except with the consent of his client after full disclosure, a lawyer shall not: (1) Accept compensation for his legal services from one other than his client. (2) Accept from one other than his client any thing of value related to his representation of or his employment by his client.
Էջ 151 - Furthermore, tampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that...
Էջ 205 - Act, as amended, shall be applicable to the business of insurance to the extent that such business is not regulated by State law.
Էջ 27 - Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
Էջ 189 - ... instructions and all other materials necessary to use or interpret such data compilations, and any product of discovery; (6) the term "custodian" means the custodian, or any deputy custodian, designated by the Attorney General under subsection (i)(l); and (7) the term "product of discovery...
Էջ 10 - Act, sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.