Sexual Shakespeare: Forgery, Authorship, PortraitureWayne State University Press, 2001 - 175 էջ Shakespeare's sexuality has always been an ambiguous concept, despite the pleasant fictions of Shakespeare in Love. Now Michael Keevak examines such sources as anecdotes, imitations, forgeries, spurious works and portraits to show that this ambiguity has a long and twisted history. |
Բովանդակություն
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | 11 |
CHAPTER I | 23 |
William Henry Ireland forged letter from Queen Elizabeth | 28 |
CHAPTER 2 | 41 |
CHAPTER 3 | 67 |
Droeshout portrait engraving detail of title page First Folio 1623 | 69 |
Sexuality and Shakespeares Portraits | 87 |
Droeshout portrait engraving frontispiece Fourth Folio 1685 | 88 |
Humphrys copy after Chandos portrait | 95 |
The Oaken Chest or the Gold Mines of Ireland | 101 |
EPILOGUE | 115 |
NOTES | 125 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
actually addressed already appears argued authentic Bacon bard become begins biographical called century Chalmers Chandos chapter cited claim contemporary criticism cultural dark lady Davenant described discussion drawing Droeshout early edition Elizabethan English engraving evidence example face fact figure forehead forgeries gender hair hand head Henry homosexual idea included Inquiry interested Ireland John kind later less letter Lives London look male Malone Marlowe master mentioned merely nature never notes once Oxford painting particular Passionate perhaps person plays poems poet portrait possible Press problem published queen question readers reading references remarks Rollins Samuel Schoenbaum seems sense sexual Shakespeare in Love simply sodomy sonnets story Stratford studies suggest theory thing University University Press Venus Venus and Adonis whole William Shakespeare woman women wonder written York young