Nomination of Sherman E. Unger: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, on the Confirmation of Sherman E. Unger to be a Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ....
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
action affidavit allegations American appeal application appointment asked Association Attorney Bank Bankruptcy believe BELL brief building called Carl Lindner Chapter XII Cincinnati Circuit COLEMAN Committee concerned copy Corporation counsel County creditors Dallas dated debtor Defendants Delaware Department District Court District of Ohio documents don't ENGEL entered Exhibit fact Federal filed Financial Freidco further give going hearing Honor injunction interest involved issue Judge Gartner July jurisdiction lawyer letter limited litigation look matter motion nomination notice objection Ohio parties partnership patent person petition plaintiffs position practice present problem proceeding question reason received record represented request responsibility Robert Rule Scioto Park Senator HATCH Sherman Southern District statement stay submitted talking testimony Texas thing told transfer trial trustee trying understand Unger Unit WELSH Wilmington
Էջ 471 - Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.
Էջ 351 - Bank holding company" means any company (1) which directly or indirectly owns, controls, or holds with power to vote, 25 per centum or more of the voting shares of each of two or more banks or of a company which is or becomes a bank holding company...
Էջ 467 - clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Էջ 471 - If an opinion or memorandum of decision is filed, it will be sufficient if the findings of fact and conclusions of law appear therein. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rules 12 or 56 or any other motion except as provided in Rule 41 (b).
Էջ 105 - A judge should accord to every person who is legally interested in a proceeding, or his lawyer, full right to be heard according to law, and, except as authorized by law, neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding.
Էջ 352 - ... shall mean all bodies having any of the powers and privileges of private corporations not possessed by individuals or partnerships, and shall include limited or other partnership associations organized under laws making the capital subscribed alone responsible for the debts of the association; (7) "court...
Էջ 476 - No temporary restraining order shall be granted without notice to the adverse party unless it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before notice can be served and a hearing had thereon.
Էջ 477 - Every such temporary restraining order shall be indorsed with the date and hour of issuance, shall be forthwith filed in the clerk's office and entered of record, shall define the injury and state why it is irreparable and why the order was granted without notice, and shall by its terms expire within such time after entry, not to exceed ten days...