The New Zealand Law Reports, Հատոր 35New Zealand Council of Law Reporting, 1916 Digest for 1903-1907 contains "Index of cases reported in the Gazette law reports and not reported in the New Zealand law reports." |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admissible agreement alleged Amendment Act apply Arbitration Auckland authority award Babcock & Wilcox bank benevolent Board Borough breach by-law Ch.D CHAPMAN charge charitable chattels claim clause consent contract costs Council counsel County Court of Appeal covenant Crown damages decision declaration defendant DENNISTON district Dunedin duty EDWARDS effect employers entitled evidence fact Gisborne granted ground held HOSKING instrument Insurance interest Invercargill Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice Land Transfer Act lease liability loan Lord mandamus Maori meaning mortgage mortgagor Native Land Act Native Land Court non-unionists notice objection offence Official Assignee opinion overdraft Palmerston North parties payment person plaintiff prisoner provisions Public Trustee purpose question reason referred registered Registrar respondent rule schedule Solicitors statute STOUT sub-s Supreme Court TAKAPUNA testator tramway trial union verdict vult Wanganui Wellington words Zealand
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 1030 - Where the goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that description, whether he be the grower or manufacturer or not, there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.
Էջ 27 - Signed, sealed, published and declared by the said Testator as and for his last Will and Testament, in the presence of us, who in his presence, at his request, and in the presence of each other, have subscribed our names as witnesses...
Էջ 518 - Provided that no conviction shall be set aside nor any new trial directed, although it appears that some evidence was improperly admitted or rejected, or that something not according to law was done at the trial or some misdirection given, unless in the opinion of the Court of Appeal some substantial wrong or miscarriage was thereby occasioned on the trial...
Էջ 548 - Where rights are infringed, where fundamental principles are overthrown, where the general system of the laws is departed from, the legislative intention must be expressed with irresistible clearness to induce a court of justice to suppose a design to effect such objects.
Էջ 289 - It is undoubtedly not competent for the prosecution to adduce evidence tending to shew that the accused has been guilty of criminal acts other than those covered by the indictment, for the purpose of leading to the conclusion that the accused is a person likely from his criminal conduct or character to have committed the offence for which he is being tried.
Էջ 279 - On the other hand, the mere fact that the evidence adduced tends to show the commission of other crimes does not render it inadmissible if it be relevant to an issue before the jury, and it may be so relevant if it bears...
Էջ 971 - Where insane delusion has once been shown to have existed, it may be difficult to say whether tlie mental disorder may not possibly have extended beyond the particular form or instance in which it has manifested itself. It may be equally difficult to say how far the delusion may not have influenced the testator in the particular disposal of his property.
Էջ 42 - If the occasion is privileged it is so for some reason, and the defendant is only entitled to the protection of the privilege if he uses the occasion for that reason. He is not entitled to the protection if he uses the occasion for some indirect and wrong motive.
Էջ 315 - When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is deemed to be relevant.
Էջ 803 - The judge has a certain duty to discharge, and the jurors have another and a different duty. The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from, which negligence may be reasonably inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred.