Lieut. General Scott's respects to the Secretary of War to say That a copy of his "Views, &c." was despatched to the President yesterday, in great haste; but the copy intended for the Secretary, better transcribed, (herewith,) was not in time for the mail. General S. would be happy if the latter could be substituted for the former. It will be seen that the "Views" only apply to a case of secession that makes a gap in the present Union. The falling off (say) of Texas, or of all the Atlantic States, from the Potomac south, was not within the scope of General S.'s provisional remedies. It is his opinion that instructions should be given, at once, to the commanders of the Barancas, Forts Moultrie and Monroe, to be on their guard against surprises and coups de main. As to regular approaches, nothing can be said or done, at this time, without volunteers. There is one (regular) company at Boston, one here, (at the Narrows,) one at Pittsburg, one at Augusta, Ga., and one at Baton Rouge—in all, five companies only, within reach, to garrison or reinforce the forts mentioned in the "Views." General Scott is all solicitude for the safety of the Union. He is, however, not without hope that all dangers and difficulties will pass away without leaving a scar or painful recollection behind. The Secretary's most obedient servant, October 30, 1860. W. S. 66 To Mr. Buchanan's Answer," General Scott published in the National Intelligencer of November 12, 1862, the following "Rejoinder: " REJOINDER OF LIEUTENANT-GENERAL SCOTT TO EX-PRESIDENT BUCHANAN. TO THE EDITORS OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER: I regret to find myself in a controversy with the venerable ex-President Buchanan. Recently (October 21) you published my official report to President Lincoln, dated March 30, 1861, giving a summary of my then recent connection with our principal Southern forts, which, I am sorry to perceive, has given offence to the ex-President. That result, purely incidental, did not enter into my purpose in drawing up the paper; but, on reflection, I suppose that under the circumstances offence was unavoidable. Let it be remembered that the new President had a right to demand of me-the immediate commander of the army-how it had happened that the incipient rebels had been allowed to seize several of those forts, and from the bad condition of others were likely to gain possession of them also. Primarily the blame rested exclusively on me. Hence, to vindicate my sworn allegiance to the Union, and professional conduct, the report was submitted to President Lincoln at an early day, (in his administration,) and recently to the world. To that short paper ex-President Buchanan publishes a reply of double the length in the Intelligencer of the 1st instant. My rejoinder, from neces sity, if not taste, will be short, for I hold the pen in a rheumatic hand, and am without aide-de-camp or amanuensis, and without a printed document and my own official papers. Unable, in my present condition, to make an analysis of the ex-President's long reply, I avail myself of a substitute furnished by an accidental visitor, who has kindly marked the few points which he thinks may require some slight notice at my hands. 1. To account for not having garrisoned sufficiently the Southern forts named against anticipated treason and rebellion, according to my many recommendations, beginning October 29, 1860, repeated the next day, and again, more earnestly, December 13, 15, 28, and 30, the ex-President says: There were no available troops within reach." 66 Now, although it is true that, with or without the ex-President's approbation, the Secretary of War had nearly denuded our whole Eastern seaboard of troops in order to augment our forces in Texas and Utah, I nevertheless pointed out, at several of the above dates, the six hundred recruits (about) which we had in the harbor of New York and at Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, nearly all organized into temporary companies, and tolerably drilled and disciplined-quite equal to the purpose in question-besides the five companies of regulars near at hand, making about one thousand men. These disposable troops would have given (say) two hundred men to the twin forts Jackson and St. Philip below New Orleans; an equal number to Fort Morgan, below Mobile; a reinforcement of one hundred men to Fort Pickens, Pensacola harbor, and a garrison of the like number to the twin fort, McRee; a garrison of one hundred men to Fort Jefferson, Tortugas Island, and the same to Fort Pulaski, below Savannah, which, like Forts Jackson, St. Philip, Morgan, and McRee, had not at the time a soldier-leaving about two hundred men for the twin forts Moultrie and Sumter, Charleston harbor, where there were two weak companies, making less than ninety men. Fortress Monroe had already a garrison of some eight companies, one or two of which might, in the earlier period of danger, have been spared till volunteers could have been obtained, notwithstanding printed handbills were everywhere posted in Eastern Virginia by an eccentric character, inviting recruits to take that most important work. Now, I have nowhere said that either of those forts, even with the reinforcement indicated, would have had a war garrison. Certainly not. My proposition was to put each in a condition, as I expressly said, to guard against a surprise or coup de main, (an off-hand attack, one without full preparation.) That these movements of small detachments might easily have been made in November and December, 1860, and some of them as late as the following month, cannot be doubted. But the ex-President sneers at my "weak device" for saving the forts. He forgets what the gallant Anderson did, with a handful of men, in Fort Sumter, and leaves out of the account what he might have done with a like handful in Fort Moultrie, even without further augmentation of men to divide between the garrisons. Twin forts, on the opposite sides of a channel, not only give a cross fire on the head of an attack, but the strength of each is more than doubled by the flanking fire VOL. XI-20 of the other. The same remarks apply to the gallant Lieut. Slemmer, with his handful of brave men, in Fort Pickens. With what contempt might he not have looked upon Chase or Bragg, in front of him, with varying masses of from two thousand to six thousand men, if Fort Pickens and its twin fort, McRee, had had between them only two hundred men! I have thus shown that small garrisons would at first have sufficed for the other twins, Forts Jackson and St. Philip, also. My object was to save to the Union, by any means at hand, all those works until Congress could have time to authorize a call for volunteers-a call which the President, for such purpose, might no doubt have made, without any special legislation, with the full approbation of every loyal man in the Union. 2. The ex-President almost loses his amiability in having his neglect of the forts"attributed," as he says, without the least cause, to the influence of Gov. Floyd;" and he adds, "all my Cabinet must bear me witness that I was the President myself, responsible for all the acts of the Administration." Now, notwithstanding this broad assumption of responsibility, I should be sorry to believe that Mr. Buchanan specially consented to the removal, by Secretary Floyd, of 115,000 extra muskets and rifles, with all their implements and ammunition, from Northern repositories to Southern arsenals, so that on the breaking out of the maturing rebellion they might be found without cost, except to the United States, in the most convenient positions for distribution among the insurgents. So, too, of the one hundred and twenty or one hundred and forty pieces of heavy artillery which the same Secretary ordered from Pittsburg to Ship Island, in Lake Borgne, and Galveston, Texas, for forts not yet erected! Accidentally learning, early in March, that, under this posthumous order, the shipment of these guns had commenced, I communicated the fact to Secretary Holt (acting for Secretary Cameron) just in time to defeat the robbery. But on this point we may hear ex-Secretary Floyd himself. At Richmond he expressly claimed the honor of defeating all my plans and solicitations respecting the forts, and received his reward-it being there universally admitted that but for that victory over me there could have been no rebellion! 3. Mr. Buchanan complains that I published, without permission, January 18, 1861, my views, addressed to him and the Secretary of War, October 29 and 30, 1860. But that act was caused, as I explained to him at the time, by the misrepresentations of the views in one of the earlier speeches of the same ex-Secretary after his return to Virginia. 4. One of my statements complaining of the joint countermand, sent through the Secretaries of War and Navy, to prevent the landing at Fort Pickens of Capt. Vogdes's company, unless the fort should be attacked, is cited by the ex-President to prove a singular want of memory" on my part; and a note from Secretary Holt is adduced to show that I had entirely approved of the joint countermand the day (January 29) that it was prepared. Few persons are as little liable to make a misstatement by accident as Mr. Holt, and no one more incapable of making one by design; yet I have not the slightest recollection of any interview with him on this subject. I do remember, however, that Mr. Holt, on some matter of business, approached my bedside about that time when I was suffering greatly from an access of pain. Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Holt, and myself were all landsmen, and could know but little of the impossibility of landing troops on an open sea beach, with a high wind and surf. Mr. Toucey, Secretary of the Navy, with officers about him of intelligence and nautical experience, ought to have said plumply that if Vogdes was not to land except in the case of attack upon Fort Pickens he might as well have remained at Fortress Monroe, as the prohibition placed the fort, so far as he was concerned, at the mercy or (as the event showed) on the want of enterprise on the part of the rebel commander at Pensacola. Possibly there are other parts of the reply which a superficial reader may think require comment or elucidation; and, indeed, here is another marked for me by my kind visitor. 5. The ex-President has brought together a labyrinth of dates respecting the arrival and departure of rebel commissioners, armistices, &c., with which, as I had no official conection, I may have made an unimportant mistake or two; but as I have not by me the means of recovering the clew to those windings, I shall not attempt to follow him. NEW YORK, 5TH AVE. HOTEL, Nov. 8, 1862. WINFIELD SCOTT. TO MR. BENNETT.1 WHEATLAND, near LANCASTER, 29th October 1862. MY DEAR SIR/ I have this moment received your letter of the 25th Instant, informing me that a number of ladies & gentlemen of Cincinnati had formed themselves into a Reading Club, & had honored me by adopting a Resolution calling it after my name. I need not say how much this token of their regard has touched the heart of an old public servant in retirement. It shall be gratefully remembered. The association, conducted with wise & persevering effort, cannot fail to prove highly useful both to its own members & to society. The solitary reading of an individual for mere pastime is of comparatively little value either to himself or to others. 'Buchanan Papers, Historical Society of Pennsylvania; Curtis's Buchanan, II. 596. The information thus acquired soon passes away & is forgotten, unless fixed upon the memory & impressed upon the heart by an interchange of opinions with congenial spirits. The participation of ladies in the duties of the association is calculated to exercise the most happy influence. It will promote refinement, religion, & morality among its members. 66 May the Buchanan Reading Club" flourish & produce good fruit long after he whose name it bears shall have been gathered to his fathers! Yours very respectfully CHARLES EDWARD BENNETT, Esquire. JAMES BUCHANAN. MY DEAR SIR/ TO MR. CAPEN.1 WHEATLAND, near LANCASTER, 7 Nov: 1862. Many thanks for your kind letter of the 29 ultimo. You have, no doubt, frequent occasions to defend me, and I am truly grateful that you embrace them with the ardor of friendship. None doubt your ability. When the troubles were approaching, I determined prayerfully upon my course, from which I never departed. This was done after much reflection; & had my earnest advice & recommendations been followed, we should have had no war. It is now alleged if I had plunged into hostilities with four or five hundred men, at an early period, this would have terrified the South into submission. General Scott's attack upon me was most unexpected and causeless. Perhaps it may prove all for the best. I owe you many thanks for the copy of "Plain Facts," &c., & I should feel much indebted to you for half a dozen more 'Buchanan Papers, Historical Society of Pennsylvania; Curtis's Buchanan, II. 596. |