The Antitrust Improvements Act of 1975: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First [-second] Session, on S. 1284 ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquisition alleged amended American anticompetitive Antitrust Division antitrust enforcement antitrust laws antitrust violations asphalt asphaltic concrete assets Attorney Bank bill cert citizens civil claims class action Clayton Act Committee Company competition Congress conspiracy consumer Corp Corporation Court of Appeals criminal decision decree defendants denied Department of Justice discovery District Court divestiture economic effect estoppel evidence Federal Trade Commission filed Georgia Government Gulf Oil Corp Hanover illegal industry injunction injury interstate commerce issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury legislation litigation Manufacturing matter ment merger monopoly nolo contendere nolo plea notice opinion parens patriae parties patent Pending petitioners plaintiff price fixing procedure Products proposed purchase reason recovery relief require res judicata result Robinson-Patman Robinson-Patman Act Rule 23 S.Ct Section Senator Hart Sherman Act Shoe statute suit Supp supra note Supreme Court tion Title treble damage trial United York
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 960 - ... the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
Էջ 847 - ACTIONS (a) Prerequisites to a Class Action. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
Էջ 1229 - That no corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission shall acquire the whole or any part of the assets of another corporation...
Էջ 763 - ... shall be entitled to sue for and have injunctive relief, in any court of the United States having jurisdiction over the parties, against threatened loss or damage by a violation of the anti-trust laws...
Էջ 762 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Էջ 1247 - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Էջ 869 - As soon as practicable after the commencement of an action brought as a class action, the court shall determine by order whether it is to be so maintained. An order under this subdivision may be conditional, and may be altered or amended before the decision on the merits.
Էջ 914 - When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order.
Էջ 1111 - ... of the United States under the antitrust laws to the effect that a defendant has violated said laws shall be prima facie evidence against such defendant in any...
Էջ 974 - States shall have the power to prescribe, by general rules, for the district courts of the United States and for the courts of the District of Columbia, the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice and procedure in civil actions at law.