 | 1819 - Страниц: 660
...principle violating the lOtn section of the 1st article of the constitution of the U. States, which declares that "no state, shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." This opinion, of course, rendered it unnecessary to consider the 2nd qucsiion. On the 3d question, the court... | |
 | Maryland. Court of Appeals, Richard W. Gill, John Johnson, Richard Wordsworth Gill - 1840 - Страниц: 578
...legislature, is it a contract protected by that clause of the Constitution of the United States, which declares that " no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts ?" This question would seem to have been fully settled by the decisions in the cases already cited, of Dartmouth... | |
 | United States. Congress - 1837 - Страниц: 740
...should err in presenting ! theirs, I shall at least place my own beyond contradiction. The constitution of the United States declares that " no State shall...absolute security upon the rights of private property. Slill the question remains, is a privilege granted by a State Legislature to a corporation, for banking... | |
 | Lysander Spooner - 1845 - Страниц: 168
...right to use them, if need be, for the defence of one's liberty or life. Seventh. The constitution of the United States declares that "no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." " The obligation of contracts," here spoken of, is, of necessity,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1858 - Страниц: 764
...consequence of the exemption, is too clear to admit of doubt — it is expressly so enacted. The constitution of the United States declares that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts, Art. I, sec. 10; and our State constitution sanctions this restriction... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1864 - Страниц: 622
...costs. HENRY R. MYGATT,ybr appellant. DANIEL S. DICKINSON, for respondent. WRIGHT, J. The constitution of the United States declares that " no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." (US Con. art. 1, §10.) The provision interpreted by the light... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1868 - Страниц: 672
...HR Mygatt, for the appellants. Dickinson & Wright, for the respondents. WMQHT, J. The Constitution of the United States declares that " no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." (US Const., art. 1, § 10.) The provision, interpreted by the... | |
 | South Carolina. Court of Appeals, J. S. G. Richardson - 1869 - Страниц: 414
...it the more obnoxious to the Constitution. The clause of the Constitution referred to, is that which declares that "no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." This Court in a recent case (State vs.Carew, 13 Rich. 498,) has had occasion to consider the question as... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1869 - Страниц: 790
...the Legislature passed on the 13th December, 1866, commonly known as the "stay law." The Constitution of the United States declares that " no State shall pass any law, impairing the obligation of contracts." The Constitution of the State of Georgia declares, that "ex... | |
 | Edward Everett Hale - 1873 - Страниц: 772
...while to inquire what can or cannot be done, before asking what ought to be done. The Constitution of the United States declares that no State shall " pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts" (art. I., sec. 10) ; that " no person shall be deprived of .... | |
| |
The Constitution of the United States declares that " no state shall pass any * » * law impairing the obligation of contracts. 
