The American Journal of International Law, Հատոր 10American Society of International Law, 1916 The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 100–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 15
... enemy or the great distance or block- ade of ports , or else on account of the danger threatening the ship which has made the capture , or the success of her operations , it is permissible for the commander , on his own responsibility ...
... enemy or the great distance or block- ade of ports , or else on account of the danger threatening the ship which has made the capture , or the success of her operations , it is permissible for the commander , on his own responsibility ...
Էջ 16
... enemy and neutral prizes . Whether it was intended to author- ize the destruction of neutral merchantmen in any case may be doubted . In fact , no merchant vessels , either enemy or neutral , were destroyed during the war with Spain ...
... enemy and neutral prizes . Whether it was intended to author- ize the destruction of neutral merchantmen in any case may be doubted . In fact , no merchant vessels , either enemy or neutral , were destroyed during the war with Spain ...
Էջ 22
... enemy prizes . Among other Continental writers who do not admit the right to destroy neutral prizes may be mentioned , Bluntschli , 36 Nippold 37 and , apparently , de Boeck , 38 Gessner , 39 and Bonfils , 40 Taylor , 41 Wool- sey , 42 ...
... enemy prizes . Among other Continental writers who do not admit the right to destroy neutral prizes may be mentioned , Bluntschli , 36 Nippold 37 and , apparently , de Boeck , 38 Gessner , 39 and Bonfils , 40 Taylor , 41 Wool- sey , 42 ...
Էջ 24
... enemy prizes . The manual of maritime war adopted by the Institute at its Oxford meeting in 1913 ( Art . 139 ) recognizes the right to destroy enemy vessels , but nothing is said in regard to the right to destroy neutral prizes ( see ...
... enemy prizes . The manual of maritime war adopted by the Institute at its Oxford meeting in 1913 ( Art . 139 ) recognizes the right to destroy enemy vessels , but nothing is said in regard to the right to destroy neutral prizes ( see ...
Էջ 25
... enemy as well as neutral , but it was often impossible to do this , and in such cases the captor could not be expected to release them . Suppose , for example , he said , a captor should after taking a prize find himself in close ...
... enemy as well as neutral , but it was often impossible to do this , and in such cases the captor could not be expected to release them . Suppose , for example , he said , a captor should after taking a prize find himself in close ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
The American Journal of International Law, Հատոր 7,Հատոր 1-2 James Brown Scott,George Grafton Wilson Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - 1913 |
Common terms and phrases
according Allies American Appam appears apply April arbitration arms and munitions Article August Austria-Hungary authority belligerent blockade Britain British capture cargo China Chinese citizens claim Clunet commission condemnation Conference Congress considered Constitution contraband decision Declaration of London Declaration of Paris decree delegation diplomatic doctrine Droit duty effect enemy England EUROPEAN existing exportation fact force foreign France French gén German Government Gulf of Fonseca Hague Convention high seas hostilities interest international law JAMES BROWN SCOTT judicial July jurisdiction justice law of nations Lordships maritime ment merchant vessels Mexico military Monroe Policy naval neutral countries neutral port Nicaragua obligation officers opinion Order in Council parties peace Porto Rico practice present President principle prize court prize law protection provisions question ratification regard relations Republic rule Russia Secretary seized seizure Senate ship submarine territory tion trade Treaty Series United violation voyage
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 99 - The Contracting Powers agree not to have recourse to armed force for the recovery of contract debts claimed from the Government of one country by the Government of another country as being due to its nationals.
Էջ 294 - April twelfth, nineteen hundred, "temporarily to provide revenues and a civil government for Porto Rico, and for other purposes...
Էջ 67 - Spain cedes to the United States the island of Porto Rico and other islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and the island of Guam in the Marianas or Ladrones.
Էջ 814 - The jurisdiction of the nation, within its own territory, is necessarily exclusive and absolute; it is susceptible of no limitation, not imposed by itself.
Էջ 460 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Էջ 540 - No principle of general law is more universally acknowledged, than the perfect equality of nations. Russia and Geneva have equal rights. It results from this equality, that no one can rightfully impose a rule on another. Each legislates for itself, but its legislation can operate on itself alone.
Էջ 6 - If a question of law to be decided is covered by a treaty in force between the belligerent captor and a Power which is itself, or whose subject or citizen is, a party to the proceedings, the court is governed by the provisions of the said treaty. In the absence of such provisions the court shall apply the rules of international law. If no generally recognized rule exists, the court shall give judgment in accordance with the general principles of justice and equity.
Էջ 556 - ... until the Government of that which deems itself aggrieved shall have maturely considered, in the spirit of peace and good neighborship, whether it would not be better that such difference should be settled by the arbitration of commissioners appointed on each side, or by that of a friendly nation.
Էջ 794 - Convention does not apply in this case, because of the "general participation" clause in Article 2 of the Hague Convention of 1907. That clause provided: "The provisions contained in the regulations (rules of land warfare) referred to in Article 1 as well as in the present convention do not apply except between contracting powers, and then only if all the belligerents are parties to the convention.
Էջ 465 - A neutral Power is not bound to prevent the export or transit, for the use of either belligerent, of arms, ammunition, or, in general, of anything which could be of use to an army or fleet.