Constitutional DiplomacyPrinceton University Press, 08 դեկ, 2020 թ. - 384 էջ Challenging those who accept or advocate executive supremacy in American foreign-policy making, Constitutional Diplomacy proposes that we abandon the supine roles often assigned our legislative and judicial branches in that field. This book, by the former Legal Counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is the first comprehensive analysis of foreign policy and constitutionalism to appear in over fifteen years. In the interval since the last major work on this theme was published, the War Powers Resolution has ignited a heated controversy, several major treaties have aroused passionate disagreement over the Senate's role, intelligence abuses have been revealed and remedial legislation debated, and the Iran-Contra affair has highlighted anew the extent of disagreement over first principles. Exploring the implications of these and earlier foreign policy disputes, Michael Glennon maintains that the objectives of diplomacy cannot be successfully pursued by discarding constitutional interests. Glennon probes in detail the important foreign-policy responsibilities given to Congress by the Constitution and the duty given to the courts of resolving disputes between Congress and the President concerning the power to make foreign policy. He reviews the scope of the prime tools of diplomacy, the war power and the treaty power, and examines the concept of national security. Throughout the work he considers the intricate weave of two legal systems: American constitutional principles and the international law norms that are part of the U.S. domestic legal system. |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 86–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
... Supreme Court to give controlling effect to the intent of Congress . It discusses the comparative institutional attributes of the political branches as foreign - policymakers and suggests that from a public - policy perspective ...
Michael J. Glennon. part a book about Supreme Court cases . While these are not the only source of the Constitution's meaning , surely they are a major one . I try nonetheless to avoid jargon and undue abstraction , and to include ...
... courts to decide . 8 Finally , one might respond that the President's independent , express power as commander - in ... Supreme Court . 1 12 6 5 N.Y. Times , May 30 , 1987 , at 6. See also letter from George Bush , Director of Central ...
... Supreme Court had to consider whether the President's instructions immunized his officer personally from an action for damages arising under the statute . 24 The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's judgment awarding damages to ...
... Supreme Court cited Little as authority for declining to find a political question . In In re Cooper , 143 U.S. 472 ( 1891 ) , the Court said that “ [ t ] he right of the executive to deal with persons and property can never , under the ...
Բովանդակություն
CHAPTER | 35 |
CHAPTER THREE | 71 |
CHAPTER FOUR | 123 |
CHAPTER FIVE | 164 |
CHAPTER | 192 |
CHAPTER SEVEN | 229 |
CHAPTER EIGHT | 283 |
APPENDIX | 329 |
General Index | 339 |
Index of Cases | 349 |