The Law Reports ... Indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies ...Council of Law Reporting, 1878 |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 46–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 4
... favour of A. may be affected by evidence of a trust in favour of B .: see Musst Thukrain Sookraj Kooar v . The Government ( 1 ) ; Widow of Shunker Sahai v . Rajah Kashi Persad ( 2 ) ; Ranee of Chillaree v . The Govern- ment of India ( 3 ) ...
... favour of A. may be affected by evidence of a trust in favour of B .: see Musst Thukrain Sookraj Kooar v . The Government ( 1 ) ; Widow of Shunker Sahai v . Rajah Kashi Persad ( 2 ) ; Ranee of Chillaree v . The Govern- ment of India ( 3 ) ...
Էջ 5
... favour of a single heir in the male line of the family of the talukdars . The ultimate remainder is by the clauses of sect . 22 granted to such persons as would have been entitled to succeed to the estate under the ordinary law to which ...
... favour of a single heir in the male line of the family of the talukdars . The ultimate remainder is by the clauses of sect . 22 granted to such persons as would have been entitled to succeed to the estate under the ordinary law to which ...
Էջ 7
... 11 Moore's Ind . Ap . C. 386 . ( 3 ) 11 Bomb . L. R. 249–274 . ( 4 ) 14 Moore's Ind . Ap . Ca. 591 . ( 5 ) 5 Bomb . H. C. R. A. C. J. 161 . J. C. 1877 BAHADUR SINGH trust in favour of the VOL . V. ] 7 INDIAN APPEALS .
... 11 Moore's Ind . Ap . C. 386 . ( 3 ) 11 Bomb . L. R. 249–274 . ( 4 ) 14 Moore's Ind . Ap . Ca. 591 . ( 5 ) 5 Bomb . H. C. R. A. C. J. 161 . J. C. 1877 BAHADUR SINGH trust in favour of the VOL . V. ] 7 INDIAN APPEALS .
Էջ 8
... favour of the husband's heirs , there are cases when an express trust created by the sunnud has been recognised , but no BRIJ INDAR case has gone so far as to recognise an implied trust . To do so in this case would be virtually to ...
... favour of the husband's heirs , there are cases when an express trust created by the sunnud has been recognised , but no BRIJ INDAR case has gone so far as to recognise an implied trust . To do so in this case would be virtually to ...
Էջ 10
... favour of Seetla , and concludes by saying , " if you file a deed of will in terms of the above proposal , you will receive a sunnud for the estate from the Government . " In her petition in answer , after pointing out her objection to ...
... favour of Seetla , and concludes by saying , " if you file a deed of will in terms of the above proposal , you will receive a sunnud for the estate from the Government . " In her petition in answer , after pointing out her objection to ...
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
adoption affirmed alienation alleged appeal BARNES PEACOCK Beng Bengal BRIJ INDAR brother BURAH BURMAH CHOWDHRY claim Commissioner contended Council custom DAKHO Darwood Dayabhaga death Debya deceased decision decree Defendant Dhorai Pandian DOORGA DWARKA entitled evidence execution favour foreclosure former suit GANESH SINGH Giri heirs held High Court Hindu law Hullodhur husband India interest issue Jains Jaintia Hills Joy Narain judgment Judicial Commissioner jurisdiction Kablas Koer Kasiswari KHAN LAL SEETLA Lall Law Rep letters patent Lordships think Maharajah mesne profits Mimamsa Mitakshara Moore's Ind mortgage MUNDUR MUSSUMUT Muttu Vaduga Najmooddin Narain Singh opinion Oudh Padamattur parties PERIASAMI PILLAI plaint Plaintiff possession present suit primogeniture proceedings purchaser question Rajah RANEE JANKI KOER referred Respondent rule sect SHEO SINGH sheriff shew Shivagunga SIR BARNES PEACOCK SIR JAMES W SIR MONTAGUE subordinate Judge Sudder sunnud Suth SYUD BAZAYET HOSSEIN TEKAIT Tevar wasilat widow zemindar
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 38 - ... certain time or otherwise, the jury, on the trial of any issue, or on any inquisition of damages, may, if they shall think fit, allow interest to the creditor, at a rate not exceeding the current rate of interest from the time when such debts or sums certain were payable, if such debts or sums be payable by virtue of some written instrument at a certain time...
Էջ 194 - If what has been done is legislation, within the general scope of the affirmative words which give the power, and if it violates no express condition or restriction by which that power is limited (in which category would, of course, be included any Act of the Imperial Parliament at variance with it), it is not for any court of justice to inquire further, or to enlarge constructively those conditions and restrictions.
Էջ 14 - What was given to a woman by the father, the mother, the husband, or a brother, or received by her at the nuptial fire, or presented to her on her husband's marriage to another wife, as also any other (separate acquisition), is denominated a woman's property.
Էջ 190 - ... the said governor-general in council shall not have the power of making any laws or regulations which shall in any way...
Էջ 135 - The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.
Էջ 135 - In all these cases it may be said, as it was said here, that the master has not authorized the act. It is true, he has not authorized the particular act, but he has put the agent in his place to do that class of acts...
Էջ 191 - Courts, and authorise any High Court to exercise all or any portion of its jurisdiction in any part of British India not included within the limits for which the High Court was established, and also to exercise any such jurisdiction in respect of any British subject for the time being within any...
Էջ 183 - Act amending the same) ; or (ii) any Act of Parliament enabling the Secretary of State in Council to raise money in the United Kingdom for the government of India...
Էջ 192 - Presidency shall have and exercise all Jurisdiction and every Power and Authority whatsoever in any manner vested in any of the Courts in the same Presidency abolished under...
Էջ 208 - The Civil Courts shall not take cogniaance of any suit brought on a cause of action which shall have been heard and determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction in a former suit between the same parties or between parties under whom they claim.