Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of the United States

IN OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES CONTAINED IN THIS BOOK.

945 80 345

954)

.1015,

Etna Life Ins. Co. v. Hanna, 81 Tex. 487 v. Ward, 140 U. S. 76 (35: 371).. Ah Ping, Re, 23 Fed. Rep. 329.. Alabama v. Georgia, 64 U. S. 23 How. 505 (16: 556).. 291, 294 Albright v. Teas, 106 Ú. S. 613 (26: 295)-572, 573 Alexander v. O'Donnell, 12 Kan. 608.. 762 v. United States, 138 U. S. 353 (34: 1017

v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 6 Cent. Rep. 630, 115 Pa. 135.. Arrowsmith v. Gleason, 129 U. S. 86, 98 (32: 630, 634).

v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194 (30: 243)..

Arthur v. Butterfield, 125 U. S. 70, 76

v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135 (24: 810). v. Dodge, 101 U. S. 34, 37 (25: 948, 950)

543

461

(31: 643, 645)..

337, 338, 820

562

335

v. Fox, 108 U. S. 125 (27: 675)... v. Lahey, 96 U. S. 112 (24: 766).. v. Morgan, 112 U. S. 495, 501 (28: 825, 827)

338 963

335

v. Unkari, 96 U. S. 118 (24: 768). 335 311 Ash v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. 72 Md. 144

1129

. Pullman's Palace Car Co. 139 U. S. 658, 662 (35: 303, 305).. v. State, 10 Ohio St. 287... Allin. Connecticut River Lumber Co. 6 L. R. A. 416, 150 Mass. 560 1128 Amato v. Northern Pac. R. Co. 46 Fed. Rep. 561 American & F. Christian Union v. Yount, 101 U. S. 352 (25: 888). American Bell Teleph. Co. v. People's

638

Teleph. Co. 22 Fed. Rep. 309 159 American File Co. v. Garrett, 110 U. S. 288, 295 (28: 149, 152).....613, American Ins. Co. v. Canter, 26 U. S. 1 Pet. 511, 542 (7: 242, 255).... American Net & T. Co. v. Worthington, 141 U. S. 468, 471, 474 (35: 821, 822, 824)....... 699, 821 American Wool Paper Co. v. Heft, 75 U. S. 8 Wall. 333 (19: 378).... Amis v. Smith, 41 U. S. 16 Pet. 303 (10: 973)..

995

Ashley v.

Eberts, 22 Ind. 55.

718

Aspden v.

Nixon, 45 U. S. 4 How. 467 (11: 1059)..

134

508

753

112

v. Forbes, 2 Myl. & C. 123, 133.. v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.

543

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

IN OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES CONTAINED IN THIS BOOK.

487..

617

736

945 v. Ward, 140 U. S. 76 (35: 371).. 80 Ah Ping, Re, 23 Fed. Rep. 329.... 345 Alabama v. Georgia, 64 U. S. 23 How. 505 (16: 556).. -291, 294 Albright v. Teas, 106 U. S. 613 (26: 295)

-572, 573 Alexander v. O'Donnell, 12 Kan. 608- 762 v. United States, 138 U. S. 353 (34: 954) ..1015, 1017 Allen v. Deacon, 10 Sawy. 210..

v. Gillette, 127 U. S. 589 (32: 271)
. Louisiana, 103 U. S. 80, 83 (26:
318, 319).

. Pullman's Palace Car Co. 139
U. S. 658, 662 (35: 303, 305)..

. Pennsylvania R. Co. 6 Cent. Rep. 630, 115 Pa. 135. Arrowsmith v. Gleason, 129 U. S. 86, 98 (32: 630, 634).

335 v. Unkart, 96 U. S. 118 (24: 768). 335 311 Ash v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. 72 Md. 144 1129

543

v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194 (30: 243)...

461

v. Fox, 108 U. S. 125 (27: 675)... v. Lahey, 96 U. S. 112 (24: 766).. v. Morgan, 112 U. S. 495, 501 (28: 825, 827)

338 963

Asher v. Texas, 128 U. S. 129 (32: 368) 2

v. State, 10 Ohio St. 287. Allin v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.

995

Ashley v.

Eberts, 22 Ind. 55.

718

Aspden v.

Nixon, 45 U. S. 4 How. 467 (11: 1059)..

134

508

753

159

638

112

712

931

American & F. Christian Union v. Yount, 101 U. S. 352 (25: 888)... American Bell Teleph. Co. v. People's Teleph. Co. 22 Fed. Rep. 309 American File Co. v. Garrett, 110 U. S. 288, 295 (28: 149, 152).....613, American Ins. Co. v. Canter, 26 U. S. 1 Pet. 511, 542 (7: 242, 255).......... American Net & T. Co. v. Worthington, 141 U. S. 468, 471, 474 (35: 821, 822, 824).. 699, 821 American Wool Paper Co. v. Heft, 75 U. S. 8 Wall. 333 (19: 378)..

Amis v. Smith, 41 U. S. 16 Pet. 303 (10: 973)..

761

Andrew v. Newcomb, 32 N. Y. 417, 421 ⚫. Spear, 4 Dill, 470.

709

184 Aurora Hill Min. Co. v. 85 Min. Co. 34
Fed. Rep. 515.......

764

229

841
561.
449, 450
496 Cantrell v. Wallick, 117 U. S. 689, 696
(29:1017,1019).

159

Carlisle v. United States, 83 U. S. 16 Wall.
151 (21: 428)...

815

269

242

Bunker v. Green, 48 Ill. 243.
Burch v. Newbury, 10 N. Y. 374..
Burckle v. Eckart, 1 Denio, 337, 341, 3
N. Y. 132
840
Burgess v. Seligman, 107 U. S. 20 (27:-
359)
761, 1133
Burke . Smith, 83 U. S. 16 Wall. 394
(21:363)
1140
Burlington, C. R. & N. R. Co. v. Sim-
mons, 123 U. S. 52 (31:73).... 1083
Burnett v. Snyder, 81 N. Y. 550, 555.. 840
Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U. S. 776 (28:-
596).

v. Grand Trunk R. Co. 63 Me. 299 Burns v. Goff, 79 Tex. 236, 239

v. Lynde, 6 Allen, 305.

Carll, Ex parte, 106 U. S. 521 (27: 288)..
Carnatic v. East India Co. 1 Ves. Jr. 371,
2 Ves. Jr. 56
Carpenter v. Strange, 141 U. S. 87 (35:
640)
1127, 1134
Carr v. Hamilton, 129 U. S. 252 (32: 669) 1062
v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117...
Carroll v. Carroll, 57 U. S. 16 How. 275,
287 (14: 936, 941).

1131

639 79

753

309

745
725 Carroll County v. Smith, 111 U.S. 556 (28:
120
517)
Carswell v. Hartridge, 55 Ga. 412....647, 648
Carter v. Bennett, 56 U. S. 15 How. 354
(14: 727).

. Safford, 44 U. S. 3 How. 441 (11:
671)

764

761

550

962

v. Territory, 1 N. M. 317

112

. West Jersey Ferry Co. 114 U.
S. 474 (29:215)

Cassidy v. Hall, 97 N. Y. 159.

841

514

Busell Trimmer Co. v. Stevens, 137 U.
S. 423 (34:719) ..

Castle v. Bullard, 64 U. S. 23 How. 172
(16: 424)..

389

Burr v. Beers, 24 N. Y. 178.
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony,
111 U. S. 53, 57 (28: 349, 350)
Burton v. Briggs, 87 U. S. 20 Wall. 125
(22:299)

Bush v. Gower, 2 Strange, 1043
Butler . Eaton, 141 U. S. 240 (35:713).

v. Gage, 188 U. S. 52 (34:869)--200, 457
v. Watkins, 80 U. S. 13 Wall. 456
(20:629)

330 Cathcart v. Robinson, 30 U. S. 5 Pet. 264, 929 271, 276, 280 (8: 120, 122, 124) 418 1064 Cawood Patent, 94 U. S. 695, 710 (24: 238, 243) ..616, 617 Central Bank of Washington v. Hume, 128U. S. 195, 205 (32: 370, 375) 568Central Pass. R. Co. v. Kuhn, 86 Ky. 578, 589 Central R. & Bkg. Co. v. Georgia, 92 U. S. 665 (23: 757) ..

389

v. Pettus, 113 U. S. 116 (28: 915).. 503. Central Transp. Co. v. Pullman Palace Car Co. 139 U. S. 24, 38-40, 42, 49, 56, 57, 60, 61, (35: 55, 61, 62, 64, 67-69)_

542, 582, 752, 755, 839-
790 Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive
Works, 135 U. S. 207 (34: 97) 1084
480 Central U. Teleph. Co. v. State, 2 West.
Rep. 773, 106 Ind. 1..

v. State, 118 Ind. 194, 207..
Chace v. Vasquez, 24 U. S. 11 Wheat.
429 (6: 511).

229

Clarke . Saffery, Ry. & M. 126.
Clauverius v. Com. 81 Va. 787.
Clay City v. Farmers Loan & T. Co. 145
U. S. 224 (36: 685)

388

1016

953

122

Cleburne v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. 66 Tex. 461

394

255

Cleveland v. Chamberlain, 65 U. S. Black, 419 (17: 93).

712

761

1046

1131

489

1131

675

525

159

628

& C. R. Co. 4 Gill & J. 152 Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Miller, 114 U. S. 176, 184 (29: 121, 123) Chesapeake & P. Teleph. Co. v. Baltimore & O. Teleg. Co. 66 Md. 399, 414. Chew Hoeng v. United States, 112 U. S. 536, 549 (28: 770, 773)------58, 345 Chicago. Robbins, 67 U. S. 2 Black, 418 (17: 298)..

. Rumsey, 87 Ill. 354.
Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Wiggins Ferry
Co. 119 U. S. 615 (30: 519) .
Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Bayfield, 37
Mich. 205.

. Whitton, 80 U. S. 13 Wall. 270
(20: 571)
Chicago & W. I. R. Co. v. Prussing, 96
Ill. 203..

Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Iowa, 94 U.
S. 155, 161, 162 (24: 94, 95).-
. Perkins, 125 Ill. 127
Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Ackley,
94 U. S. 179 (24: 99)

95 U. S. 697 (24: 542) v. McGlinn, 114 U. S. 542 (29:270) Chicago, St. L. & N. O. R. Co. v. Doyle, 60 Miss. 977 Chicago, St. P. & O. R. Co. v. Roberts, 141 U. S. 690 (35: 905): 509, 1004 China The, 74 U. S. 7 Wall. 53 (19: 67). 1129 Chinese Exclusion Case, 130 U. S. 581 (32: 1068). -269, 346 Chosen Freeholders of Passaic County v. Stevenson, 46 N. J. L. 173, 184... Christmas, v. Russell, 72 U. S. 5 Wall. 290, 305 (18: 475, 479)....357, 1134 Christy, Er parte, 44 U. S. 3 How. 292, 308 (11: 603, 610)..

304

Close v. Glenwood Cemetery, 107 U. S. 466, 476 (27: 408, 412).

Coates v. Mackey, 56 Md. 416.. Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517 (29: 715).. Coffey v. Greenfield, 62 Cal. 602.. Coffin v. Ogden, 85 U. S. 18 Wall. 120, 124 (21: 821, 823) Cofield v. Furry, 13 Ill. 13.. Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U. S. 6 Wheat. 264, 378, 393 (5: 257, 284, 288) 292 Coit v. North Carolina Gold Amalga mating Co. 119 U. S. 343 (30: 420). Cole v. Cunningham, 133 U. S. 107 (33: 538) -984, 986, 1127 v. Groves, 134 Mass. 471. Coleman v. Billings, 89 Ill. 183, 190 Coler v. Cleburne, 131 U. S. 162 (33: 146) Colgrove v. Tallman, 67 N. Y. 95.. Colorado Coal & I. Co. v. United States, 123 U. S. 307, 328 (31: 182, 190).

368

1128

628

653

120

-211, 386

1063

1002

Colt . Brown, 12 Gray, 233.
Columbia & D. Bridge Co. v. Geise, 34
N. J. L. 268..
Columbia & P. S. R. Co. v. Hawthorne,

3 Wash. Terr. 353, 364.......... 406 Commercial & R. Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, 39 U. S. 14 Pet. 60 (10: 354) Commissioners Sinking Fund v. Green & B. R. Nav. Co. 79 Ky. 73, 75, 83

Com. v. Brown, 130 Mass. 279.

772

996