Appropriate Role of Foreign Judgments in the Interpretation of American Law: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, on H. Res. 568, March 25, 2004, Հատոր 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004 - 60 էջ |
From inside the book
Արդյունքներ 27–ի 1-ից 5-ը:
Էջ 2
... practice has become truly unusual , and it is fair to say that a national consensus has developed against it . " Strikingly , the footnote following that sen- tence , presumably to support the proposition of a national con- sensus ...
... practice has become truly unusual , and it is fair to say that a national consensus has developed against it . " Strikingly , the footnote following that sen- tence , presumably to support the proposition of a national con- sensus ...
Էջ 4
... practice ... has become truly unusual , and it is fair to say that a national consensus has developed against it . " Strikingly , the footnote following that sentence , presumably to support the proposition of a " national con- sensus ...
... practice ... has become truly unusual , and it is fair to say that a national consensus has developed against it . " Strikingly , the footnote following that sentence , presumably to support the proposition of a " national con- sensus ...
Էջ 5
... 191 recognized countries throughout the world . They championed this practice and fancied themselves players on the international scene of juris prudential thought . And while we are not condemning in this resolution any 5.
... 191 recognized countries throughout the world . They championed this practice and fancied themselves players on the international scene of juris prudential thought . And while we are not condemning in this resolution any 5.
Էջ 7
... practice is dangerous and undemocratic . I would encourage the Judiciary Committee to re- port H.Res.568 out of Committee and for the House to pass this important resolu- tion . In November 2003 , I introduced a similar resolution , H ...
... practice is dangerous and undemocratic . I would encourage the Judiciary Committee to re- port H.Res.568 out of Committee and for the House to pass this important resolu- tion . In November 2003 , I introduced a similar resolution , H ...
Էջ 9
... practiced law with Latham & Watkins in San Diego . Professor Ramsey teaches Constitutional law and foreign relations law . And we welcome you here , Professor . And our fourth and final witness this morning is John 9.
... practiced law with Latham & Watkins in San Diego . Professor Ramsey teaches Constitutional law and foreign relations law . And we welcome you here , Professor . And our fourth and final witness this morning is John 9.
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
American law appropriate Article ARY OF CONGRESS Atkins BACHUS CHABOT Chairman Chief Justice citation cited clause CONG CONGRESS THE LIBR CONGRESS THE LIBRARY constitutional interpretation contemporary foreign death penalty deci Eighth Amendment European Court execution Federal Federalist Federalist Papers Feeney foreign authorities foreign courts foreign jurisdictions foreign law foreign materials foreign or international foreign practice Framers gentleman Goodlatte GRESS HOSTETTLER human rights international law issue judges judicial Judiciary Justice Ginsburg Justice Scalia Lawrence legal texts legislative legislatures LIBRA LIBRARY CONGRESS LIBRARY OF CONGRE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS look McGinnis moral and social NADLER opinion original meaning PREPARED STATEMENT Professor Jackson Professor Ramsey protect provision question RABKIN ratified relevant relied resolution Sandra Day O'Connor separation of powers sions social policy sodomy sodomy laws sovereignty stitution Supreme Court Justice Texas Thank things tion treaties U.S. Constitution U.S. courts U.S. law U.S. Supreme Court United Warsaw Convention
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 55 - At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.
Էջ 42 - The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.
Էջ 13 - It has also been observed that an act of Congress ought never to be construed to violate the law of nations if any other possible construction remains...
Էջ 2 - ... there can be no liberty ; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.
Էջ 13 - The decisions of the courts of every country, so far as they are founded upon a law common to every country, will be received, not as authority, but with respect. The decisions of the courts of every country show how the law of nations, in the given case, is understood in that country, and will be considered in adopting the rule which is to prevail in this.
Էջ 12 - An attention to the judgment of other nations is important to every Government, for two reasons : the one is, that independently of the merits of any particular plan or measure, it is desirable, on various accounts, that it should appear to other nations as the offspring of a wise and honorable policy...
Էջ 26 - The right the petitioners seek in this case has been accepted as an integral part of human freedom in many other countries. There has been no showing that in this country the governmental interest in circumscribing personal choice is somehow more legitimate or urgent.
Էջ 55 - there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.
Էջ 43 - State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers' validation of laws based on moral choices. Every single one of these laws is called into question by today's decision; the Court makes no effort to cabin the scope of its decision to exclude them from its holding.