Page images
PDF
EPUB

there, but he cannot live. The people are not worthy of

him.

Salvation from sin is a deeper and higher work than either you or S. Ryan can conceive. But do not imagine (as we are continually prone to do) that it lies in an indivisible point. You experienced a taste of it when you were justified: You since experienced the thing itself, only in a low degree; and God gave you his Spirit, that you might know the things which he had freely given you. Hold fast the beginning of your confidence steadfast unto the end. You are continually apt to throw away what you have, for what you want. However, you are right in looking for a farther instantaneous change, as well as a constant gradual one. But it is not good for you to be quite alone; you should converse frequently, as well as freely, with Miss Johnson, and any other that is much alive. You have great need of this.

MY DEAR SISTER,

I am, my dear sister,

Your affectionate brother.

CLXII.-To the Same.

Edinburgh, May 28, 1764. CERTAINLY it would be right to spend some time in setting down both the outward providences of God, and the inward leadings and workings of his Spirit, as far as you can remember them. But observe withal, you are called to be a good steward of the mammon of unrighteousness. You must therefore think of this too in its place; only without anxiety. Otherwise, that neglect of your calling will hinder the work of God in your heart. You are not serving mammon by this, but serving Christ; it is part of the task which he has assigned you. Yet it is true your heart is to be free all the time; and see that you stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free.

In a new

I thought your name had been altered before now. station you will have need of new watchfulness. Still redeem the time; be steadily serious; and follow your own conscience in all things.

I am, my dear sister,

Your affectionate brother.

In my return from the Highlands, I expect to spend a day at Newcastle-upon-Tyne, the 18th or 19th of June.

[merged small][ocr errors]

CLXIII-To the Same.

MY DEAR SISTER,

London, August 2, 1776. I KNOW not that you differ from me at all. You are certainly in your place at present; and it seems one providential reason of your ill health was, to drive you thither. Now, use all the ability which God giveth, and he will give more: Unto him that hath shall be given, and he shall have more abundantly; it is the hand of the diligent that maketh rich. If you can persuade honest Alice Brammah to be cleanly as well as gentle, she will be tenfold more useful; and so will Billy Brammah, if he will be teachable and advisable; otherwise there is a fly in the pot of ointment. You are sent to Leeds chiefly for the sake of those that enjoy, or thirst after, perfect loveRedeem the time! Go on in His name! And let the world and the devil fall under your feet!

I am, my dear sister,

Your affectionate brother.

CLXIV. To the Same.

MY DEAR SISTER,

October, 1776. You have abundant reason to praise God, who has dealt so mercifully with you, and to encourage all about you never to rest till they attain full salvation.

As to the question you propose, if the Leader himself desires it, and the class be not unwilling, in that case there can be no objection to your meeting a class even of men. This is not properly assuming or exercising any authority over them. You do not act as a superior, but an equal; and it is an act of friendship and brotherly love.

I am glad you had a little conversation with Miss Ritchie. She is a precious soul. Do her all the good you can, and incite her to exert all the talents which God has given her. I am Your affectionate brother.

[ocr errors]

CLXV. To the Same.

MY DEAR SISTER,

London, December 1, 1781.

NEVER be afraid that I should think your letters troublesome: I am never so busy as to forget my friends.

Mr. and Mrs. Fletcher made an excellent beginning, and I trust they will increase with all the increase of God. Now, let all of you that remain in the neighbourhood arise up and supply her lack of service. Be instant in season, out of season; that all may know you have caught her mantle !

But pray do not suffer my poor Miss Ritchie to work herself to death. Let her do all she can, and not more than she can. I am

Your affectionate brother.

MY DEAR SISTER,

CLXVI. To the Same.

Near London, November 21, 1783.

THROUGH the blessing of God, I find no difference at all between the health and strength which are now given me, and that which I had forty years ago. Only I had then many pains which I have not now.

You are enabled to give a very clear and standing proof that weakness of nerves cannot prevent joy in the Lord. Your nerves have been remarkably weak, and that for many years: But still your soul can magnify the Lord, and your spirit rejoice in God your Saviour!

Your affectionate brother.

DEAR SIR,

CLXVII.-To Dr. Robertson.

Bristol, September 24, 1753. I HAVE lately had the pleasure of reading Mr. Ramsay's "Principles of Religion," with the notes you have annexed to them. Doubtless he was a person of a bright and strong understanding, but I think not of a very clear apprehension. Perhaps it might be owing to this, that, not distinctly perceiving the strength of some of the objections to his hypothesis, he is very peremptory in his assertions, and apt to treat his opponent with an air of contempt and disdain. This seems to have been a blemish even in his moral character. I am afraid the using guile is another; for surely it is a mere artifice to impute to the Schoolmen the rise of almost every opinion which he censures; seeing he must have known that most, if not all, of those opinions, preceded the Schoolmen several hundred years.

The treatise itself gave me a stronger conviction than ever I had before, both of the fallaciousness and unsatisfactoriness of the mathematical method of reasoning on religious subjects. Extremely fallacious it is; for if we slip but in one line, a whole train of errors may follow: And utterly unsatisfactory, at least to me, because I can never be sufficiently assured that this is not the case.

The two first books, although doubtless they are a fine chain of reasoning, yet gave me the less satisfaction, because I am clearly of Mr. H's judgment, that all this is beginning at the wrong end; that we can have no idea of God, nor any sufficient proof of his very being, but from the creatures; and that the meanest plant is a far stronger proof hereof, than all Dr. Clarke's or the Chevalier's demonstrations.

Among the latter, I was surprised to find a demonstration of the manner how God is present to all beings; (page 57;) how he begat the Son from all eternity; (page 77;) and how the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son. (Page 85.) Quanto satius est fateri nescire quæ nescias, quam ista effu tientem nauseare, et ipsum tibi displicere?* How much better to keep to his own conclusion, (page 95,) "Reason proves that this mystery is possible!" Revelation assures us that it is true; Heaven alone can show us how it is.

There are several propositions in his second book which I cannot assent to; particularly with regard to the divine foreknowledge. I can by no means acquiesce in the twenty-second proposition, "That it is a matter of free choice in God, to think of finite ideas." I cannot reconcile this with the assertion of the Apostle, "Known unto God are all his works an aswvos, from eternity." And if any one ask, "How is God's foreknowledge consistent with our freedom?" I plainly answer, I cannot tell.

In the third book, (page 209,) I read, “The desire of God, purely as beatifying, as the source of infinite pleasure, is a necessary consequence of the natural love we have for happiI deny it absolutely. My natural love for happiness was as strong thirty years ago as at this instant. Yet I had

[ocr errors]

ness."

* This quotation from Cicero on the Nature of the Gods is thus translated by Dr. Francklin:-"How much more laudable would it be, to acknowledge you do not know what you do not know, than to follow that blunderer, whom you must surely despise."-EDIT.

then no more desire of God, as the source of any pleasure at all, than I had of the devil or of hell. So totally false is that, "That the soul inevitably loves what it judges to be the best."

Equally false is his next corollary; that "if ever fallen spirits see and feel that moral evil is a source of eternal misery, they cannot continue to will it deliberately.” (Ibid.) I can now show living proofs of the contrary. But I take knowledge, both from this and many other of his assertions, that Mr. R. never rightly understood the height and depth of that corruption which is in man, as well as diabolical nature.

The doctrine of pure love, as it is stated in the fourth book and elsewhere, (the loving God chiefly is not solely for his inherent perfections,) I once firmly espoused. But I was at length unwillingly convinced that I must give it up, or give up the Bible. And for near twenty years I have thought, as I do now, that it is at least unscriptural, if not antiscriptural: For the Scripture gives not the least intimation, that I can find, of any higher, or indeed any other, love of God, than that mentioned by St. John: "We love him, because he first loved us." And I desire no higher love of God, till my spirit returns to Him.

Page 313: "There can be but two possible ways of curing moral evil; the sensation of pleasure in the discovery of truth, or the sensation of pain in the love of error."

So here is one who has searched out the Almighty to perfection! who knows every way wherein He can exert his omnipotence !

I am not clear in this. to act in some third way.

I believe it is very possible for God I believe he can make me as holy as an archangel, without any sensation at all preceding.

Page 324: "Hence it is that the chaos mentioned in the first chapter of Genesis cannot be understood of the primitive state of nature."

Why not, if God created the world gradually, as we are assured he did?

In the fifth book, (page 334,) I read a more extraordinary assertion than any of the preceding: "The infusion of such supernatural habits, by one instantaneous act, is impossible. We cannot be confirmed in immutable habits of good, but by a long continued repetition of free acts." I dare not say so. I am persuaded God can this moment confirm me immutably good.

« ՆախորդըՇարունակել »