Interstate Taxation, S. 2173: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, First and Second Sessions ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - 957 էջ |
Այլ խմբագրություններ - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities affiliated allocation appellant applied apportioned apportionment formula audit Baskin-Robbins bill burden business income Butler Brothers California combined reporting Commerce Clause committee Compact Clause Congress Constitution cost customers decision determine dividends exemption fact Federal Florida foreign source income Franchise Tax Franchise Tax Board going gross receipts tax Illinois imposed included income tax interstate business interstate commerce interstate sales interstate taxation Iowa jurisdictional standard legislation mail order manufacturing ment Moorman multinational multinational corporations Ohio operations payroll percent problem profits purchaser require result retail rule sales factor sales tax Senator MATHIAS SINGLETARY solicitation South Carolina statute subsidiaries supra tangible personal property tax administrators tax base Tax Compact tax laws tax liability tax treaties taxable income taxing jurisdictions taxpayer three-factor formula tion transactions treaty U.S. Steel U.S. Supreme Court Underwood Typewriter uniformity unitary business unitary method United West Virginia
Սիրված հատվածներ
Էջ 672 - No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, . . .
Էջ 593 - conclude [s] that net income from the interstate operations of a foreign corporation may be subjected to state taxation provided the levy is not discriminatory and is properly apportioned to local activities within the taxing State forming sufficient nexus to support the same.
Էջ 695 - No two or more states shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them, without the consent of the United States in congress assembled, specifying accurately the purposes for which the same is to be entered into, and how long it shall continue.
Էջ 553 - Carolina a percentage of income "out of all appropriate proportion to the business transacted by the appellant in that State," the court refused to approve the result reached by the formula.
Էջ 677 - Looking at the clause in which the terms "compact" or "agreement" appear, it is evident that the prohibition is directed to the formation of any combination tending to the increase of political power in the states, which may encroach upon or interfere with the just supremacy of the United States.
Էջ 639 - Every retailer maintaining a place of business in this State and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this State, not exempted hereunder shall, at the time of making the sales or, if the storage, use, or other consumption of the tangible personal property is not then taxable hereunder, at the time...
Էջ 582 - ... having understandably persisted in their efforts to get some return for the substantial benefits they have afforded it, there is little wonder that there has been no end of cases testing out state tax levies. The resulting judicial application of constitutional principles to specific state statutes leaves much room for controversy and confusion and little in the way of precise guides to the States in the exercise of their indispensable power of taxation.
Էջ 652 - Words and phrases are construed according to the context and the approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning...
Էջ 692 - Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd., v. State Tax Commission, 266 US 271).
Էջ 447 - The legislature in attempting to put upon this business its fair share of the burden of taxation was faced with the impossibility of allocating specifically the profits earned by the processes conducted within its borders.