motion of a bird gliding through the air is exquisitely beautiful; but the swiftness with which lightning darts through the sky is magnificent and astonishing. Here it is necessary to observe, that the sensations of sublime and beautiful are not always distinguished by very distant boundaries; but are capable, in many instances, of approaching toward each other. Thus a gentle running stream is one of the most beautiful objects in nature; but,as it swells gradually into a great river, the Beautiful by degrees is lost in the Sublime. A young tree is a beautiful object; a spreading ancient oak is a venerable and sublime one. To return, however, to the beauty of motion,it will be found to hold very generally, that motion in a straight line is not so beautiful as in a waving direction; and motion upward is commonly more pleasing than motion downward. The easy, curling motion of flame and smoke is an object singularly agreeable. Hogarth observes very ingeniously, that all the common and necessary motions for the business of life are performed in straight or plain lines; but that all the graceful and ornamental movements are made in curve lines: an observation worthy the attention of those who study the grace of gesture and action.

Color, figure, and motion, though separate principles of Beauty, yet in many beautiful objects meet together, and thereby render the beauty greater and more complex. Thus in flowers, trees and animals, we are entertained at once with the delicacy of the color, with the gracefulness of the figure, and sometimes also with the motion of the object. The most complete assemblage of beautiful objects which can be found, is represented by a rich natural landscape, where there is a sufficient variety of objects; fields in verdure, scattered trees and flowers, running water, and animals grazing. If to these be added some of the productions of art suitable to such a scene; as a bridge with arches over a river, smoke rising from cottages in the midst of trees, and a distant view of a fine building seen by the rising sun; we

then enjoy, in the highest perfection, that gay, cheerful and placid sensation which characterizes Beauty.. The beauty of the human countenance is more com. plex than any we have yet examined. It comprehends the beauty of color, arising from the delicate shades of the complexion; and the beauty of figure, arising from the lines which constitute different features of the face. But the principal beauty of the countenance depends upon a mysterious expression which it conveys of the qualities of the mind; of good sense, or good humor; of candor, benevolence, sensibility, or other amiable dispositions. It may be observed, that there are certain qualities of the mind, which, whether expressed in the countenance, or by words, or by actions, always raise in us a feeling similar to that of Beauty. There are two great classes of moral qualities; one is of the high and the great virtues, which require extraordinary efforts, and is founded on dangers and sufferings; as heroism, magnanimity, contempt of pleasures, and contempt of death. These produce in the spectator an emotion of Sublimity and Grandeur. The other class is chiefly of the social virtues, and such as are of a softer and gentler kind; as compassion, mildness and generosity. These excite in the beholder a sensation of pleasure, so nearly allied to that excited by beautiful external objects, that, though of a more exalted nature,it may with propriety be classed under the same head.

Beauty of writing in its more definite sense, characterizes a particular manner; signifying a certain grace and amenity, in the turn either of style or sentiment, by which some authors are particularly distinguished. In this sense it denotes a manner neither remarkably sublime, nor vehemently passionate, nor uncommonly sparkling; but such as excites in the reader an emotion of the placid, resembling that which is raised by the contemplation of beautiful objects in nature; which neither lifts the mind very high, nor agitates it to excess, but spreads over the imagination a pleasing serenity. Addison is a writer of

this character, and one of the most proper examples of it. Fenelon, the author of Telemachus, is another example. Virgil, also, though very capable of rising occasionally into the Sublime, yet generally is distinguished by the character of Beauty and Grace, rather than of Sublimity. Among orators, Cicero has more of the Beautiful than Demosthenes, whose genius led him wholly toward vehemence and strength.

So much it is necessary to have said upon the subject of Beauty; since next to Sublimity, it is the most copious source of the Pleasures of Taste. But objects delight the imagination not only by appearing under the forms of Sublime or Beautiful; they likewise derive their power of giving it pleasure from several other principles.

Novelty, for example, has been mentioned by Addison, and by every writer on this subject. An object which has no other merit than that of being new, by this quality alone raises in the wind a vivid and an agreeable emotion. Hence that passion of curiosity which prevails so generally in mankind. Objects and ideas which have been long familiar, make too faint an impression to give an agreeable exercise to our faculties. New and strange objects rouse the mind from its dormant state, by giving it a sudden and pleasing impulse. Hence, in a great measure, the entertainment we receive from fiction and romance. The emotion raised by Novelty is of a more lively and awak ening nature than that produced by Beauty, but much shorter in its duration. For, if the object have in itself no charms to hold our attention, the gloss spread over it by Novelty soon wears off.

Imitation is another source of pleasure to Taste. This gives rise to what Addison terms the Secondary Pleasures of Imagination, which form a very extensive class. For all imitation affords some pleasure to the mind; not only the imitation of beautiful or sublime objects, by recalling the original ideas of Beauty or Grandeur, which such objects themselves exhibited, but even objects which have neither beauty nor gran

deur; nay, some which are terrible or deformed give us pleasure in a secondary or represented view.

The pleasures of Melody and Harmony belong also to Taste. There is no delightful sensation we receive, either from Beauty or Sublimity, which is not capable of being heightened by the power of musical sound. Hence the charm of poetical numbers, and even of the concealed and looser measures of prose. Wit, humor and ridicule open likewise a variety of pleasures to Taste, altogether different from any that have yet been considered.

At present it is not necessary to pursue any farther the subject of the Pleasures of Taste. We have opened some of the general principles; it is time now to apply them to our chief subject. If it be asked, to what class of those Pleasures of Taste, which have been enumerated, that pleasure is to be referred which we receive from poetry, eloquence, or fine writing; the answer is, Not to any one, but to them all. This peculiar advantage writing and discourse possess ; they encompass a large and fruitful field on all sides, and have power to exhibit in great perfection, not a single set of objects only, but almost the whole of those which give pleasure to Taste and Imagination; whether that pleasure arise from Sublimity, from Beauty in its various forms, from design and art, from moral sentiment, from novelty, from harmony, from wit, humor, or ridicule. To whichsoever of these a person's taste is directed, from some writer or other he has it always in his power to receive the gratification of it.

It has been usual among critical writers to treat of discourse, as the chief of all the imitative arts. They compare it with painting and with sculpture, and in many respects prefer it justly before them. But we must distinguish between imitation and description. Words have no natural resemblance of the ideas or objects which they signify; but a statue or picture has a natural likeness of the original.

As far, however, as a poet or historian introduces into his work persons really speaking, and, by words

which he puts into their mouths, represents the conversation which they might be supposed to hold, so far his art may be called imitative; and this is the case in all dramatic composition. But in narrative or descriptive works it cannot with propriety be so called. Who, for example, would call Virgil's description of a tempest in the first Æneid an imitation of a storm? If we heard of the imitation of a battle we might naturally think of some mock fight, or representation of a battle on the stage; but should never imagine it meant one of Homer's descriptions in the Iliad. It must be allowed at the same time, that imitation and description agree in their principal effect, that of recalling by external signs the ideas of things which we do not see. But though in this they coincide, yet it should be remembered, that the terms themselves are not synonimous; that they import different means of producing the same end, and consequently make different impressions on the mind.

ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF LANGUAGE.

TO form an adequate idea of the Origin of Language, we must contemplate the circumstances of mankind in their earliest and rudest state. They were then a wandering, scattered race; no society among them except families, and family society also very imperfect; as their mode of living, by hunting or pastur age, must have separated them frequently from each other. In such a condition, how could any one set of sounds or words be universally agreed on, as the signs of their ideas? Supposing that a few, whom chance or necessity threw together, agreed by some means upon certain signs; yet by what authority could these be so propagated among other tribes or families, as to grow up into a language? One would imagine that men must have been previously gathered together in considerable numbers,before language could be fixed and ex