...private parties. Int. Com. Comu. v. liaird, 19-1 US ÏÔ Щ Sup. Ct 543, 4o b. Ed. 800]. But the шого liberal the practice in admitting testimony, the more...imperative the obligation to preserve the essential rules oí evidence by which rights are asserted or defended. In such cases the- commissioners cannot tu-t...

...rules, as to the admissibility of evidence, which prevail in suits between private parties. * * * But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony...asserted or defended. In. such cases the Commissioners can not act upon their own information, as could jurors in primitive days, All parties must be fully...

...strict rules as to the admissibility of evidence which prevail in suits between private parties. But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony, the more imperative the obligation to preserve those essentials of action in accordance with evidence adduced by which rights have immemorably been...

...evidence rules and the rule as to authenticating documents, records and accounts. It has no reference to the essential rules of evidence by which rights are asserted or defended. AH parties must be fully apprised of the evidence submitted or to be considered, and must be given...

...common law, yet, by reason of the liberality of practice in admitting testimony, it is more imperative to preserve the essential rules of evidence by which rights are asserted or defended, and the commissioners cannot act upon their own information, but the parties must be fully apprised...

...evidence as prevails in suits between private parties, (Inter-State Commerce Com. v. Blair, 194 US 25,) yet "the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony...defended. In such cases the commissioners cannot act ujxjn their own information, as could jurors in primitive, days. All parties must be fully apprised...

...••••Hlcnee. which prevail in suits between private parties, (/nt. Com. Comm. v. Jiti'inl. 1M I". S. 25.) But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony,...preserve the essential rules of evidence by which rights •*• asserted or defended. In such cases the Commissioners cannot act upon their nun information...

...administrative body essentially, not bound necessarily to the technique of judicial tribunals. But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony, the more imperative the obligation to preserve those essentials of action in accordance with evidence adduced by which rights have immemorially been...

...prevail in suits between private parties. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird (194 US, 25). But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony...asserted or defended. In such cases the commissioners can not act upon their own information as could jurors in primitive days. All parties must be fully...

...States in Interstate Commerce Commission v. L. & NRR Co., 227 US 88, 33 Sup. Ct. 185, 57 L. Ed. 431, "the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony,...Imperative the obligation to preserve the essential rules * * * by which rights are asserted-or defended." [3] The right of the commission to net depended upon...