 Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods nor any other means of getting them than to go into the market and buy them...  The American Jurist and Law Magazine - Էջ 1671843Ամբողջությամբ դիտվող - Այս գրքի մասին
 | William Roberts - 1807 - 522 էջ
...63, and the Court of King's Bench in Cooper » Elston, 7 TR 14, have moat emphatically decided, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future period, is as much within the statute as where the goods are to be delivered immediately. Upon the... | |
 | Royal Agricultural Society of England - 1893 - 1182 էջ
...as follows : — The generally accepted doctrine in this country is, as stated by Mr. Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods nor any other means of getting them than to go into... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1840 - 752 էջ
...authority of the case of Bryan v. Lewis (a), where Lord Tenterden ruled at Nisi Prius, that if a party contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day, he not then having them nor having contracted to buy them, but intending afterwards to go into the... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1841 - 1040 էջ
...offences at common law (b). A wager on the future price of goods would not seem to be illegal (c). Nor is a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor neither has the goods in... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1842 - 814 էջ
...made by persons who had an option either to work for this or that person as they chose. A contract (Z) for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future...vendor neither has the goods in his possession, nor (i) Coppock v. Bower, 4 M. & W. (/) Hibblewhite M'Morme, 5 M. & W. 361. 4f>2, cited in Mortimer v.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Edward Younge, John Collyer - 1844 - 712 էջ
...whole interest. She is, therefore, entitled to a decree: Graham v. Oliver (g). At law, a contract for sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is not rendered void by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor had neither the possession... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1850 - 652 էջ
...whole interest. She is, therefore, entitled to a decree : Graham v. Oliver.(d) At law, a contract for sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is not rendered void by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor had neither the possession... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1866 - 626 էջ
...case of Stanton v. Small, 3 Sandford's NY Sup. Court R., 230, "But it is now well established that a contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered...of the contract the vendor neither has the goods in possession, nor has entered into any contract to buy them, nor has any reasonable expectation of becoming... | |
| |
